These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

108 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17702210)

  • 1. Alternative computer mouse design and testing to reduce finger extensor muscle activity during mouse use.
    Lee DL; Fleisher J; McLoone HE; Kotani K; Dennerlein JT
    Hum Factors; 2007 Aug; 49(4):573-84. PubMed ID: 17702210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Observed finger behaviour during computer mouse use.
    Lee DL; McLoone H; Dennerlein JT
    Appl Ergon; 2008 Jan; 39(1):107-13. PubMed ID: 17400173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Providing training enhances the biomechanical improvements of an alternative computer mouse design.
    Houwink A; Oude Hengel KM; Odell D; Dennerlein JT
    Hum Factors; 2009 Feb; 51(1):46-55. PubMed ID: 19634308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Alternative computer mouse designs: performance, posture, and subjective evaluations for college students aged 18-25.
    Feathers DJ; Rollings K; Hedge A
    Work; 2013; 44 Suppl 1():S115-22. PubMed ID: 23241688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Computer keyswitch force-displacement characteristics affect muscle activity patterns during index finger tapping.
    Lee DL; Kuo PL; Jindrich DL; Dennerlein JT
    J Electromyogr Kinesiol; 2009 Oct; 19(5):810-20. PubMed ID: 18515146
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evaluating the effect of four different pointing device designs on upper extremity posture and muscle activity during mousing tasks.
    Lin MY; Young JG; Dennerlein JT
    Appl Ergon; 2015 Mar; 47():259-64. PubMed ID: 25479996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Forearm electromyographic changes with the use of a haptic force-feedback computer mouse.
    Dennerlein JT; DiMarino MH
    Hum Factors; 2006; 48(1):130-41. PubMed ID: 16696263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The effect of keyboard keyswitch make force on applied force and finger flexor muscle activity.
    Rempel D; Serina E; Klinenberg E; Martin BJ; Armstrong TJ; Foulke JA; Natarajan S
    Ergonomics; 1997 Aug; 40(8):800-8. PubMed ID: 9336104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Interactive effects of acute experimental pain in trapezius and sored wrist extensor on the electromyography of the forearm muscles during computer work.
    Samani A; Fernández-Carnero J; Arendt-Nielsen L; Madeleine P
    Appl Ergon; 2011 Jul; 42(5):735-40. PubMed ID: 21183156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effects of precision demands and mental pressure on muscle activation and hand forces in computer mouse tasks.
    Visser B; De Looze M; De Graaff M; Van Dieën J
    Ergonomics; 2004 Feb; 47(2):202-17. PubMed ID: 14660213
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The effect of typing posture on wrist extensor muscle loading.
    Keir PJ; Wells RP
    Hum Factors; 2002; 44(3):392-403. PubMed ID: 12502157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Keyboard reaction force and finger flexor electromyograms during computer keyboard work.
    Martin BJ; Armstrong TJ; Foulke JA; Natarajan S; Klinenberg E; Serina E; Rempel D
    Hum Factors; 1996 Dec; 38(4):654-64. PubMed ID: 8976628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Smaller external notebook mice have different effects on posture and muscle activity.
    Oude Hengel KM; Houwink A; Odell D; van Dieën JH; Dennerlein JT
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2008 Jul; 23(6):727-34. PubMed ID: 18348899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Physical exposure differences between children and adults when using standard and small computer input devices.
    Blackstone JM; Karr C; Camp J; Johnson PW
    Ergonomics; 2008 Jun; 51(6):872-89. PubMed ID: 18484401
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Changes in upper extremity biomechanics across different mouse positions in a computer workstation.
    Dennerlein JT; Johnson PW
    Ergonomics; 2006 Nov; 49(14):1456-69. PubMed ID: 17028089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A literature review of the effects of computer input device design on biomechanical loading and musculoskeletal outcomes during computer work.
    Bruno Garza JL; Young JG
    Work; 2015; 52(2):217-30. PubMed ID: 26444935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The effects of keyswitch stiffness on typing force, finger electromyography, and subjective discomfort.
    Gerard MJ; Armstrong TJ; Franzblau A; Martin BJ; Rempel DM
    Am Ind Hyg Assoc J; 1999; 60(6):762-9. PubMed ID: 10635542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effects of keyswitch design and finger posture on finger joint kinematics and dynamics during tapping on computer keyswitches.
    Jindrich DL; Balakrishnan AD; Dennerlein JT
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2004 Jul; 19(6):600-8. PubMed ID: 15234484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Biomechanics and performance when using a standard and a vertical computer mouse.
    Quemelo PR; Vieira ER
    Ergonomics; 2013; 56(8):1336-44. PubMed ID: 23777482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effects of negatively sloped keyboard wedges on risk factors for upper extremity work-related musculoskeletal disorders and user performance.
    Woods M; Babski-Reeves K
    Ergonomics; 2005 Dec; 48(15):1793-808. PubMed ID: 16373317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.