416 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17702366)
1. Outcome after aortic valve replacement: comparison of homografts with mechanical prostheses.
Kilian E; Oberhoffer M; Kaczmarek I; Bauerfeind D; Kreuzer E; Reichart B
J Heart Valve Dis; 2007 Jul; 16(4):404-9. PubMed ID: 17702366
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The homograft aortic valve: a 29-year, 99.3% follow up of 1,022 valve replacements.
O'Brien MF; Harrocks S; Stafford EG; Gardner MA; Pohlner PG; Tesar PJ; Stephens F
J Heart Valve Dis; 2001 May; 10(3):334-44; discussion 335. PubMed ID: 11380096
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Evaluation of valve-related complications in patients with Sorin Bicarbon prosthesis: a seven-year experience.
Bortolotti U; Milano A; D'Alfonso A; Piccin C; Mecozzi G; Magagna P; Fabbri A; Mazzucco A
J Heart Valve Dis; 2001 Nov; 10(6):795-801. PubMed ID: 11767189
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Re-do aortic valve replacement: does a previous homograft influence the operative outcome?
Kumar P; Athanasiou T; Ali A; Nair S; Oz BS; DeSouza A; Moat N; Shore DF; Pepper JR
J Heart Valve Dis; 2004 Nov; 13(6):904-12; discussion 912-3. PubMed ID: 15597580
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Biological versus mechanical aortic prosthesis? A nineteen-year comparison in a propensity-matched population.
Bottio T; Rizzoli G; Caprili L; Testolin L; Thiene G; Gerosa G
J Heart Valve Dis; 2005 Jul; 14(4):493-500. PubMed ID: 16116876
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Outcome after aortic valve replacement in young adults: is patient profile more important than prosthesis type?
Klieverik LM; Noorlander M; Takkenberg JJ; Kappetein AP; Bekkers JA; van Herwerden LA; Bogers AJ
J Heart Valve Dis; 2006 Jul; 15(4):479-87; discussion 487. PubMed ID: 16901039
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Five-year follow up of the ATS mechanical heart valve.
Emery RW; Krogh CC; Jones DJ; Nicoloff DM; Blake DP; Arom KV
J Heart Valve Dis; 2004 Mar; 13(2):231-8. PubMed ID: 15086262
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evolution of aortic valve replacement in children: a single center experience.
Ruzmetov M; Vijay P; Rodefeld MD; Turrentine MW; Brown JW
Int J Cardiol; 2006 Nov; 113(2):194-200. PubMed ID: 16376439
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Prospective evaluation of aortic valve replacement in young adults and middle-aged patients: mechanical prosthesis versus pulmonary autograft.
Concha M; Aranda PJ; Casares J; Merino C; Alados P; Muñoz I; Villalba R; Ariza J
J Heart Valve Dis; 2005 Jan; 14(1):40-6. PubMed ID: 15700435
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Results of aortic valve replacement with pulmonary and aortic homografts.
Naegele H; Bohlmann M; Döring V; Kalmar P; Rödiger W
J Heart Valve Dis; 2000 Mar; 9(2):215-20; discussion 220-1. PubMed ID: 10772039
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The Bicarbon heart valve prosthesis: short-term results.
Casselman F; Herijgers P; Meyns B; Flameng W; Daenen W
J Heart Valve Dis; 1997 Jul; 6(4):410-5. PubMed ID: 9263874
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Mechanical aortic and mitral valve replacement in infants and children.
Sachweh JS; Tiete AR; Mühler EG; Groetzner J; Gulbins H; Messmer BJ; Daebritz SH
Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2007 Apr; 55(3):156-62. PubMed ID: 17410500
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Performance of bioprostheses and mechanical prostheses in age group 61-70 years.
Prasongsukarn K; Jamieson WR; Lichtenstein SV
J Heart Valve Dis; 2005 Jul; 14(4):501-8, 510-1; discussion 509. PubMed ID: 16116877
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Valve-related events after aortic root replacement with cryopreserved aortic homografts.
Kaya A; Schepens MA; Morshuis WJ; Heijmen RH; Brutel de la Riviere A; Dossche KM
Ann Thorac Surg; 2005 May; 79(5):1491-5. PubMed ID: 15854921
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Pulmonary homografts for aortic valve replacement: long-term comparison with aortic grafts.
Vogt F; Kowert A; Beiras-Fernandez A; Oberhoffer M; Kaczmarek I; Reichart B; Kilian E
Heart Surg Forum; 2011 Aug; 14(4):E237-41. PubMed ID: 21859642
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Surgical treatment of active native aortic valve endocarditis with allografts and mechanical prostheses.
Klieverik LM; Yacoub MH; Edwards S; Bekkers JA; Roos-Hesselink JW; Kappetein AP; Takkenberg JJ; Bogers AJ
Ann Thorac Surg; 2009 Dec; 88(6):1814-21. PubMed ID: 19932241
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Mechanical versus bioprosthetic valve replacement in middle-aged patients.
Kulik A; Bédard P; Lam BK; Rubens FD; Hendry PJ; Masters RG; Mesana TG; Ruel M
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2006 Sep; 30(3):485-91. PubMed ID: 16857373
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Late outcomes following freestyle versus homograft aortic root replacement: results from a prospective randomized trial.
El-Hamamsy I; Clark L; Stevens LM; Sarang Z; Melina G; Takkenberg JJ; Yacoub MH
J Am Coll Cardiol; 2010 Jan; 55(4):368-76. PubMed ID: 20117443
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Aortic homograft: a suitable substitute for aortic valve replacement.
Talwar S; Mohapatra R; Saxena A; Singh R; Kumar AS
Ann Thorac Surg; 2005 Sep; 80(3):832-8. PubMed ID: 16122437
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Pulmonary autograft versus aortic homograft for aortic valve replacement: interim results from a prospective randomized trial.
Aklog L; Carr-White GS; Birks EJ; Yacoub MH
J Heart Valve Dis; 2000 Mar; 9(2):176-88; discussion 188-9. PubMed ID: 10772034
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
