143 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17703446)
1. Evaluation of agreement between conventional and liquid-based cytology in cervical cancer early detection based on analysis of 2,091 smears: experience at the Brazilian National Cancer Institute.
Girianelli VR; Santos Thuler LC
Diagn Cytopathol; 2007 Sep; 35(9):545-9. PubMed ID: 17703446
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Accuracy of a low priced liquid-based method for cervical cytology in 632 women referred for colposcopy after a positive Pap smear.
van Hemel BM; Buikema HJ; Groen H; Suurmeijer AJ
Diagn Cytopathol; 2009 Aug; 37(8):579-83. PubMed ID: 19373881
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Performance and cost analysis of Siriraj liquid-based cytology: a direct-to-vial study.
Laiwejpithaya S; Benjapibal M; Laiwejpithaya S; Wongtiraporn W; Sangkarat S; Rattanachaiyanont M
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2009 Dec; 147(2):201-5. PubMed ID: 19747757
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Causes and relevance of unsatisfactory and satisfactory but limited smears of liquid-based compared with conventional cervical cytology.
Siebers AG; Klinkhamer PJ; Vedder JE; Arbyn M; Bulten J
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2012 Jan; 136(1):76-83. PubMed ID: 22208490
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Proposed Sheffield quantitative criteria in cervical cytology to assist the diagnosis and grading of squamous intra-epithelial lesions, as some Bethesda system definitions require amendment.
Slater DN; Rice S; Stewart R; Melling SE; Hewer EM; Smith JH
Cytopathology; 2005 Aug; 16(4):168-78. PubMed ID: 16048503
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Two cytological methods for screening for cervical cancer].
Kirschner B; Simonsen K; Junge J
Ugeskr Laeger; 2008 May; 170(22):1933-7. PubMed ID: 18513478
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Dutch solutions for liquid-based cytology: analysis of unsatisfactory slides and HPV testing of equivocal cytology.
Boon ME; Rijkaart DC; Ouwerkerk-Noordam E; Korporaal H
Diagn Cytopathol; 2006 Sep; 34(9):644-8. PubMed ID: 16900471
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Results of the implementation of liquid-based cytology-SurePath in the Ontario screening program.
Colgan TJ; McLachlin CM; Cotterchio M; Howlett R; Seidenfeld AM; Mai VM
Cancer; 2004 Dec; 102(6):362-7. PubMed ID: 15481083
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Endometrial carcinoma detected with SurePath liquid-based cervical cytology: comparison with conventional cytology.
Patel C; Ullal A; Roberts M; Brady J; Birch P; Bulmer JN; Wadehra V
Cytopathology; 2009 Dec; 20(6):380-7. PubMed ID: 19207308
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A comparison of liquid-based cytology with conventional cytology in cervical cancer screening.
Akamatsu S; Kodama S; Himeji Y; Ikuta N; Shimagaki N
Acta Cytol; 2012; 56(4):370-4. PubMed ID: 22846595
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Direct-to-vial comparison of a new liquid-based cytology system, liqui-PREP versus the conventional pap smear.
Park J; Jung EH; Kim C; Choi YH
Diagn Cytopathol; 2007 Aug; 35(8):488-92. PubMed ID: 17636495
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison between Siriraj liquid-based and conventional cytology for detection of abnormal cervicovaginal smears: a split-sample study.
Laiwejpithaya S; Rattanachaiyanont M; Benjapibal M; Khuakoonratt N; Boriboonhirunsarn D; Laiwejpithaya S; Sangkarat S; Wongtiraporn W
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2008; 9(4):575-80. PubMed ID: 19256741
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Preliminary study of a new, fully automated system for liquid-based cytology: the NovaPrep® processor system.
Esquivias López-Cuervo J; Montalbán Beltran E; Cuadros Lopez JL; Alonso Castillo A; Nieto Sanchez T
Acta Cytol; 2011; 55(3):281-6. PubMed ID: 21525741
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Overview of the cytology laboratory: specimen processing through diagnosis.
Joste N
Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am; 2008 Dec; 35(4):549-63; viii. PubMed ID: 19061816
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Interlaboratory reproducibility of liquid-based equivocal cervical cytology within a randomized controlled trial framework.
Confortini M; Bondi A; Cariaggi MP; Carozzi F; Dalla Palma P; Ghiringhello B; Minucci D; Montanari G; Parisio F; Prandi S; Schiboni ML; Ronco G
Diagn Cytopathol; 2007 Sep; 35(9):541-4. PubMed ID: 17703457
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Repeating cytological preparations on liquid-based cytology samples: A methodological advantage?
Pinto AP; Maia HF; di Loretto C; Krunn P; Túlio S; Collaço LM
Diagn Cytopathol; 2007 Oct; 35(10):663-9. PubMed ID: 17854084
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. High-grade cervical abnormalities and screening intervals in New South Wales, Australia.
Schindeler S; Morrell S; Zuo Y; Baker D
J Med Screen; 2008; 15(1):36-43. PubMed ID: 18416954
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Comparison of conventional PAP smear with liquid based cytology method (LBC)].
Tsonev A; Ivanov S; Kovachev E
Akush Ginekol (Sofiia); 2012; 51(7):20-4. PubMed ID: 23610913
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The New Technologies for Cervical Cancer Screening randomised controlled trial. An overview of results during the first phase of recruitment.
Ronco G; Brezzi S; Carozzi F; Dalla Palma P; Giorgi-Rossi P; Minucci D; Naldoni C; Segnan N; Zappa M; Zorzi M; Cuzick J;
Gynecol Oncol; 2007 Oct; 107(1 Suppl 1):S230-2. PubMed ID: 17822751
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Liquid-based cytology and conventional smears compared over two 12-month periods.
Williams AR
Cytopathology; 2006 Apr; 17(2):82-5. PubMed ID: 16548992
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
