143 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17703446)
21. Improvement of diagnostic accuracy and screening conditions with liquid-based cytology.
Schledermann D; Ejersbo D; Hoelund B
Diagn Cytopathol; 2006 Nov; 34(11):780-5. PubMed ID: 17041948
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Liquid-based cytology can improve efficiency of cervical smear readers: evidence from timing surveys in two NHS cytology laboratories.
Dowie R; Stoykova B; Crawford D; Desai M; Mather J; Morgan K; Shirt M
Cytopathology; 2006 Apr; 17(2):65-72. PubMed ID: 16548990
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Liquid-based cervical cytology tests.
Sulik SM; Becker LA; Grant WD
J Fam Pract; 2002 Apr; 51(4):378. PubMed ID: 11978265
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
24. [Plea for quality cytological specimens in the screening of cervical cancer].
Marie G; Barjot P; Crouet H; von Theobald P; Soutif C; Levy G
Rev Fr Gynecol Obstet; 1993 Jun; 88(6):365-7. PubMed ID: 8351458
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Resolution of equivocal results with the Hybrid Capture II high-risk HPV DNA test: a cytologic/histologic review of 191 cases.
Knoepp SM; Kuebler DL; Wilbur DC
Diagn Mol Pathol; 2007 Sep; 16(3):125-9. PubMed ID: 17721319
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Liquid-based cytology test use by office-based physicians: United States, 2006-2007.
Hing E; Saraiya M; Roland KB
Natl Health Stat Report; 2011 Jun; (40):1-6. PubMed ID: 21692417
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Rapid, high throughput determination of cervical cytology specimen adequacy using a capillary-based cytometer.
Polina R; Sturgis C; Patterson J; Patterson BK
Cytometry B Clin Cytom; 2008 Mar; 74(2):133-6. PubMed ID: 18044721
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Comparison of the conventional cervical smear and liquid-based cytology: results of a controlled, prospective study in the Abruzzo Region of Italy.
Maccallini V; Angeloni C; Caraceni D; Fortunato C; Venditti MA; Di Gabriele G; Antonelli C; Lattanzi A; Puliti D; Ciatto S; Confortini M; Sani C; Zappa M
Acta Cytol; 2008; 52(5):568-74. PubMed ID: 18833819
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Transformation zone sampling rate is a useful performance indicator for practitioners collecting cervical samples using SurePath liquid-based cytology system.
Narine N; Young W
Cytopathology; 2007 Aug; 18(4):220-4. PubMed ID: 17578516
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Re: Liquid-based cytology for cervical screening.
Blamey S; Jackson T; Robinson J
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 2006 Feb; 46(1):70-1; author reply 71-2. PubMed ID: 16441706
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
31. Reliability of self-report versus chart-based prostate cancer, PSA, DRE and urinary symptoms.
Sayre EC; Bunting PS; Kopec JA
Can J Urol; 2009 Feb; 16(1):4463-71. PubMed ID: 19222884
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. [The role of the cytological screening, HPV-test and the colposcopy for early detection of the precancerous lesions of the uterine cervix].
Ivanov S
Akush Ginekol (Sofiia); 2007; 46(9):45-9. PubMed ID: 18646309
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Early detection of precursors of cervical cancer with cervical cytology and visual inspection of cervix with acetic Acid.
Dhaubhadel P; Vaidya A; Choudhary P
JNMA J Nepal Med Assoc; 2008; 47(170):71-6. PubMed ID: 18709035
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Impact of ASC-H terminology on the detection of HSILs in medically underserved California women.
Howell LP; Gurusinghe S; Tabnak F
Diagn Cytopathol; 2009 Feb; 37(2):103-10. PubMed ID: 19021201
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Performance of the DNA-Citoliq liquid-based cytology system compared with conventional smears.
Alves VA; Castelo A; Filho AL; Vianna MR; Taromaru E; Namiyama G; Lorincz A; Dores GB;
Cytopathology; 2006 Apr; 17(2):86-93. PubMed ID: 16548993
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. European guidelines for quality assurance in cervical cancer screening: recommendations for collecting samples for conventional and liquid-based cytology.
Arbyn M; Herbert A; Schenck U; Nieminen P; Jordan J; Mcgoogan E; Patnick J; Bergeron C; Baldauf JJ; Klinkhamer P; Bulten J; Martin-Hirsch P
Cytopathology; 2007 Jun; 18(3):133-9. PubMed ID: 17573762
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Interobserver variability in cytologic subclassification of squamous intraepithelial lesions--the Bethesda System vs. World Health Organization classification.
Pajtler M; Audy-Jurković S; Milicić-Juhas V; Staklenac B; Pauzar B
Coll Antropol; 2006 Mar; 30(1):137-42. PubMed ID: 16617588
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. [Evaluation of Brn-3a immunocytochemistry of liquid-based ThinPrep cytology test in early diagnosis of cervical process].
Guo XD; Niu K; Zhao JM; Xiong L; Zhang X; Zhao YL
Xi Bao Yu Fen Zi Mian Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2011 Jul; 27(7):801-2. PubMed ID: 22031962
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Postradical vaginal trachelectomy follow-up by isthmic-vaginal smear cytology: a 13-year audit.
Ghorab Z; Ismiil N; Covens A; Nofech-Mozes S; Saad RS; Dubé V; Khalifa MA
Diagn Cytopathol; 2009 Sep; 37(9):641-6. PubMed ID: 19306425
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. [A falsely reassuring cervical smear in adenocarcinoma of the external os].
Rooker D; Baalbergen A; Helmerhorst TJ
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2008 Apr; 152(17):977-80. PubMed ID: 18549169
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
