These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

103 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17703458)

  • 1. Cervical cytology reading times: a comparison between ThinPrep Imager and conventional methods.
    Davey E; Irwig L; Macaskill P; Chan SF; D'Assuncao J; Richards A; Farnsworth A
    Diagn Cytopathol; 2007 Sep; 35(9):550-4. PubMed ID: 17703458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A comparison of screening times between the ThinPrep Imager and conventional cytology.
    Boost T
    Diagn Cytopathol; 2009 Sep; 37(9):661-4. PubMed ID: 19459203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A three-armed trial of the ThinPrep Imaging System.
    Roberts JM; Thurloe JK; Bowditch RC; Hyne SG; Greenberg M; Clarke JM; Biro C
    Diagn Cytopathol; 2007 Feb; 35(2):96-102. PubMed ID: 17230572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Accuracy of reading liquid based cytology slides using the ThinPrep Imager compared with conventional cytology: prospective study.
    Davey E; d'Assuncao J; Irwig L; Macaskill P; Chan SF; Richards A; Farnsworth A
    BMJ; 2007 Jul; 335(7609):31. PubMed ID: 17604301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Liquid-based cytology can improve efficiency of cervical smear readers: evidence from timing surveys in two NHS cytology laboratories.
    Dowie R; Stoykova B; Crawford D; Desai M; Mather J; Morgan K; Shirt M
    Cytopathology; 2006 Apr; 17(2):65-72. PubMed ID: 16548990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Comparison of the ThinPrep monolayer technique and conventional cervical Pap smears in a high-risk population using the Munich II nomenclature].
    Lellé RJ; Cordes A; Regidor M; Maier E; Flenker H
    Gynakol Geburtshilfliche Rundsch; 2007; 47(2):81-7. PubMed ID: 17440269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Rapid, high throughput determination of cervical cytology specimen adequacy using a capillary-based cytometer.
    Polina R; Sturgis C; Patterson J; Patterson BK
    Cytometry B Clin Cytom; 2008 Mar; 74(2):133-6. PubMed ID: 18044721
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Does providing previous results change the accuracy of cervical cytology?
    Davey E; Irwig L; Macaskill P; Clarke J; Thurloe J; Hyne S; Biro C
    Acta Cytol; 2009; 53(6):644-52. PubMed ID: 20014553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Accuracy and perceptions of virtual microscopy compared with glass slide microscopy in cervical cytology.
    Evered A; Dudding N
    Cytopathology; 2011 Apr; 22(2):82-7. PubMed ID: 20482714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. [Two cytological methods for screening for cervical cancer].
    Kirschner B; Simonsen K; Junge J
    Ugeskr Laeger; 2008 May; 170(22):1933-7. PubMed ID: 18513478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Whole, Turret and step methods of rapid rescreening: is there any difference in performance?
    Montemor EB; Roteli-Martins CM; Zeferino LC; Amaral RG; Fonsechi-Carvasan GA; Shirata NK; Utagawa ML; Longatto-Filho A; Syrjanen KJ
    Diagn Cytopathol; 2007 Jan; 35(1):57-60. PubMed ID: 17173293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Repeating cytological preparations on liquid-based cytology samples: A methodological advantage?
    Pinto AP; Maia HF; di Loretto C; Krunn P; Túlio S; Collaço LM
    Diagn Cytopathol; 2007 Oct; 35(10):663-9. PubMed ID: 17854084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Intralaboratory reproducibility in cervical cytology. Results of the application of a 100-slide set.
    Confortini M; Biggeri A; Cariaggi MP; Carozzi FM; Minuti PA; Russo A; Palli D
    Acta Cytol; 1993; 37(1):49-54. PubMed ID: 8434496
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Preliminary study of a new, fully automated system for liquid-based cytology: the NovaPrep® processor system.
    Esquivias López-Cuervo J; Montalbán Beltran E; Cuadros Lopez JL; Alonso Castillo A; Nieto Sanchez T
    Acta Cytol; 2011; 55(3):281-6. PubMed ID: 21525741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The effect of lubricant contamination on ThinPrep (Cytyc) cervical cytology liquid-based preparations.
    Holton T; Smith D; Terry M; Madgwick A; Levine T
    Cytopathology; 2008 Aug; 19(4):236-43. PubMed ID: 18093222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Overview of the cytology laboratory: specimen processing through diagnosis.
    Joste N
    Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am; 2008 Dec; 35(4):549-63; viii. PubMed ID: 19061816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Switching from neural networks (PAPNET) to the Imager (Hologic) for computer-assisted screening.
    Boon ME; Ouwerkerk-Noordam E; Meijer-Marres EM; Bontekoe TR
    Acta Cytol; 2011; 55(2):163-6. PubMed ID: 21325801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [The use of a computerised system in the reading of cytological cervicovaginals smears during programming of regional screening (one year of experience using the autopap system)].
    Orlassino R; Fabbrini T; Gallo C; Vineis C
    Pathologica; 2005 Apr; 97(2):78-83. PubMed ID: 16032952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Proteomic analysis of high-grade dysplastic cervical cells obtained from ThinPrep slides using laser capture microdissection and mass spectrometry.
    Gu Y; Wu SL; Meyer JL; Hancock WS; Burg LJ; Linder J; Hanlon DW; Karger BL
    J Proteome Res; 2007 Nov; 6(11):4256-68. PubMed ID: 17902640
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A comparison of variability in Papanicolaou and liquid-based cytology inadequacy rates using Shewhart control charts.
    Fox R; Nix AB; Fielder H
    Cytopathology; 2006 Aug; 17(4):175-81. PubMed ID: 16879264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.