These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
202 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17703722)
1. [Influence of material on biocompatibility of intraocular lenses]. Słowiński K; Misiuk-Hojło M; Szaliński M Polim Med; 2007; 37(1):35-45. PubMed ID: 17703722 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Influence of intraocular lens material and design on postoperative intracapsular cellular reactivity. Apple DJ Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc; 2000; 98():257-83. PubMed ID: 11190028 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Hydrophobic acrylic versus heparin surface-modified polymethylmethacrylate intraocular lens: a biocompatibility study. Tognetto D; Toto L; Minutola D; Ballone E; Di Nicola M; Di Mascio R; Ravalico G Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2003 Aug; 241(8):625-30. PubMed ID: 12883913 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Uveal and capsular biocompatibility of a single-piece, sharp-edged hydrophilic acrylic intraocular lens with collagen (Collamer): 1-year results. Schild G; Amon M; Abela-Formanek C; Schauersberger J; Bartl G; Kruger A J Cataract Refract Surg; 2004 Jun; 30(6):1254-8. PubMed ID: 15177600 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Evaluation of the posterior capsule opacification in different types of artificial intraocular lenses]. Pozlerová J; Nekolová J; Jirásková N; Rozsíval P Cesk Slov Oftalmol; 2009 Jan; 65(1):12-5. PubMed ID: 19366031 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Uveal and capsular biocompatibility after implantation of sharp-edged hydrophilic acrylic, hydrophobic acrylic, and silicone intraocular lenses in eyes with pseudoexfoliation syndrome. Richter-Mueksch S; Kahraman G; Amon M; Schild-Burggasser G; Schauersberger J; Abela-Formanek C J Cataract Refract Surg; 2007 Aug; 33(8):1414-8. PubMed ID: 17662434 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Update on fixation of rigid and foldable posterior chamber intraocular lenses. Part II: Choosing the correct haptic fixation and intraocular lens design to help eradicate posterior capsule opacification. Ram J; Apple DJ; Peng Q; Visessook N; Auffarth GU; Schoderbek RJ; Ready EL Ophthalmology; 1999 May; 106(5):891-900. PubMed ID: 10328386 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Effect of different shape and material of intraocular lens on posterior capsule opacification]. Szaliński M; Oficjalska-Młyńczak J; Zajac-Pytrus H Klin Oczna; 2005; 107(1-3):156-8. PubMed ID: 16052830 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Lens epithelial cell reaction after implantation of different intraocular lens materials: two-year results of a randomized prospective trial. Tognetto D; Toto L; Sanguinetti G; Cecchini P; Vattovani O; Filacorda S; Ravalico G Ophthalmology; 2003 Oct; 110(10):1935-41. PubMed ID: 14522768 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Neodymium:YAG capsulotomy rates following phacoemulsification with implantation of PMMA, silicone, and acrylic intraocular lenses. Ram J; Kaushik S; Brar GS; Gupta A Ophthalmic Surg Lasers; 2001; 32(5):375-82. PubMed ID: 11563781 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Results and complications of hydrophobic acrylic vs PMMA posterior chamber lenses in children under 17 years of age. Küchle M; Lausen B; Gusek-Schneider GC Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2003 Aug; 241(8):637-41. PubMed ID: 12883914 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Intraocular lens changes after short- and long-term exposure to intraocular silicone oil. An in vivo study. Khawly JA; Lambert RJ; Jaffe GJ Ophthalmology; 1998 Jul; 105(7):1227-33. PubMed ID: 9663226 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Posterior capsule opacification with 3 intraocular lenses: 12-year prospective study. Rønbeck M; Kugelberg M J Cataract Refract Surg; 2014 Jan; 40(1):70-6. PubMed ID: 24238943 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Intraocular lens materials and styles: a review. Chehade M; Elder MJ Aust N Z J Ophthalmol; 1997 Nov; 25(4):255-63. PubMed ID: 9395827 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Biocompatibility of intraocular lens materials. Werner L Curr Opin Ophthalmol; 2008 Jan; 19(1):41-9. PubMed ID: 18090897 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Biocompatibility of poly(methyl methacrylate), silicone, and AcrySof intraocular lenses: randomized comparison of the cellular reaction on the anterior lens surface. Hollick EJ; Spalton DJ; Ursell PG; Pande MV J Cataract Refract Surg; 1998 Mar; 24(3):361-6. PubMed ID: 9559472 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Limitation of Scheimpflug videophotography system in quantifying posterior capsule opacification after intraocular lens implantation. Tanaka Y; Kato S; Miyata K; Honbo M; Nejima R; Kitano S; Amano S; Oshika T Am J Ophthalmol; 2004 Apr; 137(4):732-5. PubMed ID: 15059713 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Posterior capsule opacification after extra capsular cataract extraction in Indian rural population: foldable acrylic vs poly (methyl-methacrylate) intraocular lenses a randomized clinical trial. Shah AR; Praveen MR; Vasavada AR Eye (Lond); 2008 Jul; 22(7):889-94. PubMed ID: 17318205 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The effect of polymethylmethacrylate, silicone, and polyacrylic intraocular lenses on posterior capsular opacification 3 years after cataract surgery. Hollick EJ; Spalton DJ; Ursell PG; Pande MV; Barman SA; Boyce JF; Tilling K Ophthalmology; 1999 Jan; 106(1):49-54; discussion 54-5. PubMed ID: 9917780 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Nd:YAG laser capsulotomy rates following implantation of square-edged intraocular lenses: polymethyl methacrylate versus silicone versus acrylic. Ram J; Kumar S; Sukhija J; Severia S Can J Ophthalmol; 2009 Apr; 44(2):160-4. PubMed ID: 19491949 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]