234 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17705113)
21. [Fluoroscopy time -- an overestimated factor for patient radiation exposure in invasive cardiology].
Kuon E; Robinson DM; Empen K; Dahm JB
Rofo; 2005 Jun; 177(6):812-7. PubMed ID: 15902630
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Multidetector computed tomography chest examinations with low-kilovoltage protocols in adults: effect on image quality and radiation dose.
Kim MJ; Park CH; Choi SJ; Hwang KH; Kim HS
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2009; 33(3):416-21. PubMed ID: 19478637
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Reduction of radiation exposure while maintaining high-quality fluoroscopic images during interventional cardiology using novel x-ray tube technology with extra beam filtering.
den Boer A; de Feyter PJ; Hummel WA; Keane D; Roelandt JR
Circulation; 1994 Jun; 89(6):2710-4. PubMed ID: 8205685
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Exposure variability and image quality in computed radiography.
Fauber TL
Radiol Technol; 2009; 80(3):209-15. PubMed ID: 19153197
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. [Dosage monitoring as a quality control instrument in digital radiography].
Kurtz C; Czapp W; Klose KJ
Rofo; 1998 Nov; 169(5):465-70. PubMed ID: 9849594
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Radiation dose reduction in paediatric fluoroscopy using added filtration.
Nicholson RA; Thornton A; Akpan M
Br J Radiol; 1995 Mar; 68(807):296-300. PubMed ID: 7735770
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. New technologies to reduce pediatric radiation doses.
Bernhardt P; Lendl M; Deinzer F
Pediatr Radiol; 2006 Sep; 36 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):212-5. PubMed ID: 16862409
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Measurements of occupational and patient exposure as well as image quality for two C-arms.
Blaickner M; Neuwirth J
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2013 Aug; 155(4):451-8. PubMed ID: 23509391
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Anticipation of radiation dose to the conceptus from occupational exposure of pregnant staff during fluoroscopically guided electrophysiological procedures.
Damilakis J; Perisinakis K; Theocharopoulos N; Tzedakis A; Manios E; Vardas P; Gourtsoyiannis N
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2005 Jul; 16(7):773-80. PubMed ID: 16050837
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Fluoroscopic vs blind positioning: comparing entrance skin exposure.
Haynes K; Curtis T
Radiol Technol; 2009; 81(1):15-23. PubMed ID: 19738185
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Management of pediatric radiation dose using Philips fluoroscopy systems DoseWise: perfect image, perfect sense.
Stueve D
Pediatr Radiol; 2006 Sep; 36 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):216-20. PubMed ID: 16862406
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Effect of automatic tube current modulation on radiation dose and image quality for low tube voltage multidetector row CT angiography: phantom study.
Schindera ST; Nelson RC; Yoshizumi T; Toncheva G; Nguyen G; DeLong DM; Szucs-Farkas Z
Acad Radiol; 2009 Aug; 16(8):997-1002. PubMed ID: 19409820
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. An examination of automatic exposure control regimes for two digital radiography systems.
Marshall NW
Phys Med Biol; 2009 Aug; 54(15):4645-70. PubMed ID: 19590115
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Quantification of motion unsharpness in digital fluoroscopy.
Kotre CJ; Marshall NW; Guibelalde E
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 117(1-3):304-8. PubMed ID: 16461501
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Fluoroscopically guided percutaneous vertebroplasty: assessment of radiation doses and implementation of procedural routines to reduce operator exposure.
von Wrangel A; Cederblad A; Rodriguez-Catarino M
Acta Radiol; 2009 Jun; 50(5):490-6. PubMed ID: 19363715
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Radiation dose and image quality for paediatric interventional cardiology.
Vano E; Ubeda C; Leyton F; Miranda P
Phys Med Biol; 2008 Aug; 53(15):4049-62. PubMed ID: 18612174
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Functionality and operation of fluoroscopic automatic brightness control/automatic dose rate control logic in modern cardiovascular and interventional angiography systems: a report of Task Group 125 Radiography/Fluoroscopy Subcommittee, Imaging Physics Committee, Science Council.
Rauch P; Lin PJ; Balter S; Fukuda A; Goode A; Hartwell G; LaFrance T; Nickoloff E; Shepard J; Strauss K
Med Phys; 2012 May; 39(5):2826-8. PubMed ID: 22559654
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Navigating the fluoroscope's C-arm back into position: an accurate and practicable solution to cut radiation and optimize intraoperative workflow.
Matthews F; Hoigne DJ; Weiser M; Wanner GA; Regazzoni P; Suhm N; Messmer P
J Orthop Trauma; 2007; 21(10):687-92. PubMed ID: 17986885
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Radiation dose and image quality for paediatric interventional cardiology systems. A national survey in Chile.
Ubeda C; Vano E; Miranda P; Leyton F; Martinez LC; Oyarzun C
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2011 Nov; 147(3):429-38. PubMed ID: 21148589
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Radiation dose reduction without compromise of image quality in cardiac angiography and intervention with the use of a flat panel detector without an antiscatter grid.
Partridge J; McGahan G; Causton S; Bowers M; Mason M; Dalby M; Mitchell A
Heart; 2006 Apr; 92(4):507-10. PubMed ID: 16159965
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
