These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

509 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17705942)

  • 1. Effects of contextual cues in recall and recognition memory: the misinformation effect reconsidered.
    Campbell JM; Edwards MS; Horswill MS; Helman S
    Br J Psychol; 2007 Aug; 98(Pt 3):485-98. PubMed ID: 17705942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Dissociating automatic and intentional processes in children's eyewitness memory.
    Holliday RE; Hayes BK
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2000 Jan; 75(1):1-42. PubMed ID: 10660902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Effects of modality on memory for original and misleading information.
    Dijkstra K; Moerman EM
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2012 May; 140(1):58-63. PubMed ID: 22459559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Does the nature of the experience influence suggestibility? A study of children's event memory.
    Gobbo C; Mega C; Pipe ME
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2002 Apr; 81(4):502-30. PubMed ID: 11890734
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A temporal discriminability account of children's eyewitness suggestibility.
    Bright-Paul A; Jarrold C
    Dev Sci; 2009 Jul; 12(4):647-61. PubMed ID: 19635090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Trauma and memory: effects of post-event misinformation, retrieval order, and retention interval.
    Paz-Alonso PM; Goodman GS
    Memory; 2008 Jan; 16(1):58-75. PubMed ID: 17852727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Memory strength affects reporting of misinformation.
    Marche TA
    J Exp Child Psychol; 1999 May; 73(1):45-71. PubMed ID: 10196074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Similarity of encoding context does not influence resistance to memory impairment following misinformation.
    Bowman LL; Zaragoza MS
    Am J Psychol; 1989; 102(2):249-64. PubMed ID: 2729452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The effects of conformity on recognition judgements for emotional stimuli.
    Brown C; Schaefer A
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2010 Jan; 133(1):38-44. PubMed ID: 19782336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Clarification of the memory artefact in the assessment of suggestibility.
    Willner P
    J Intellect Disabil Res; 2008 Apr; 52(Pt 4):318-26. PubMed ID: 18339094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Post-event information presented in a question form eliminates the misinformation effect.
    Lee YS; Chen KN
    Br J Psychol; 2013 Feb; 104(1):119-29. PubMed ID: 23320446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Encoding modality can affect memory accuracy via retrieval orientation.
    Pierce BH; Gallo DA
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2011 Mar; 37(2):516-21. PubMed ID: 21261425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Age differences in eyewitness memory for a realistic event.
    West RL; Stone KR
    J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci; 2014 May; 69(3):338-47. PubMed ID: 23531920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The effect of age on word-stem cued recall: a behavioral and electrophysiological study.
    Osorio A; Ballesteros S; Fay S; Pouthas V
    Brain Res; 2009 Sep; 1289():56-68. PubMed ID: 19615347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Undoing suggestive influence on memory: the reversibility of the eyewitness misinformation effect.
    Oeberst A; Blank H
    Cognition; 2012 Nov; 125(2):141-59. PubMed ID: 22883683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Failure of interpolated tests in inducing memory impairment with final modified tests: evidence unfavorable to the blocking hypothesis.
    Belli RF
    Am J Psychol; 1993; 106(3):407-27. PubMed ID: 8238667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Misinformation effects in eyewitness memory: the presence and absence of memory impairment as a function of warning and misinformation accessibility.
    Eakin DK; Schreiber TA; Sergent-Marshall S
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2003 Sep; 29(5):813-25. PubMed ID: 14516215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The co-witness misinformation effect: memory blends or memory compliance?
    Skagerberg EM; Wright DB
    Memory; 2008 May; 16(4):436-42. PubMed ID: 18432487
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Context binding in schizophrenia: effects of clinical symptomatology and item content.
    Diaz-Asper C; Malley J; Genderson M; Apud J; Elvevåg B
    Psychiatry Res; 2008 Jun; 159(3):259-70. PubMed ID: 18442860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The effects of noise and gender on children's episodic and semantic memory.
    Boman E
    Scand J Psychol; 2004 Nov; 45(5):407-16. PubMed ID: 15535809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 26.