These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

118 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17706438)

  • 1. Preparation of the coronal and middle third of oval root canals with a rotary or an oscillating system.
    Rüttermann S; Virtej A; Janda R; Raab WH
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2007 Dec; 104(6):852-6. PubMed ID: 17706438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A comparative study of root canal preparation with NiTi-TEE and K3 rotary Ni-Ti instruments.
    Jodway B; Hülsmann M
    Int Endod J; 2006 Jan; 39(1):71-80. PubMed ID: 16409331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of root canal preparation with two rotary NiTi instruments: ProFile .04 and GT Rotary.
    Rödig T; Hülsmann M; Kahlmeier C
    Int Endod J; 2007 Jul; 40(7):553-62. PubMed ID: 17511784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. SEM evaluation of canal wall dentine following use of Mtwo and ProTaper NiTi rotary instruments.
    Foschi F; Nucci C; Montebugnoli L; Marchionni S; Breschi L; Malagnino VA; Prati C
    Int Endod J; 2004 Dec; 37(12):832-9. PubMed ID: 15548274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of three techniques for preparing oval-shaped root canals.
    Taha NA; Ozawa T; Messer HH
    J Endod; 2010 Mar; 36(3):532-5. PubMed ID: 20171378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Cross-sectional analysis of root canals prepared with NiTi rotary instruments and stainless steel reciprocating files.
    Grande NM; Plotino G; Butti A; Messina F; Pameijer CH; Somma F
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2007 Jan; 103(1):120-6. PubMed ID: 17178505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Ultrastructural morphologic evaluation of root canal walls prepared by two rotary nickel-titanium systems: a comparative study.
    Sabet NE; Lutfy RA
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2008 Sep; 106(3):e59-66. PubMed ID: 18602300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Efficiency of hand and rotary instruments in shaping oval root canals.
    Weiger R; ElAyouti A; Löst C
    J Endod; 2002 Aug; 28(8):580-3. PubMed ID: 12184418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Smear layer production of K3 and ProFile Ni-Ti rotary instruments in curved root canals: a comparative SEM study.
    Kum KY; Kazemi RB; Cha BY; Zhu Q
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2006 Apr; 101(4):536-41. PubMed ID: 16545720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Efficacy of rotary instruments with greater taper in preparing oval root canals.
    Elayouti A; Chu AL; Kimionis I; Klein C; Weiger R; Löst C
    Int Endod J; 2008 Dec; 41(12):1088-92. PubMed ID: 19133098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effectiveness in cleaning oval-shaped root canals using Anatomic Endodontic Technology, ProFile and manual instrumentation: a scanning electron microscopic study.
    Zmener O; Pameijer CH; Banegas G
    Int Endod J; 2005 Jun; 38(6):356-63. PubMed ID: 15910470
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Scanning electron microscopic evaluation of debris and smear layer remaining following use of ProTaper and Hero Shaper instruments in combination with NaOCl and EDTA irrigation.
    Yang G; Wu H; Zheng Y; Zhang H; Li H; Zhou X
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2008 Oct; 106(4):e63-71. PubMed ID: 18701325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Changes in compaction stress distributions in roots resulting from canal preparation.
    Versluis A; Messer HH; Pintado MR
    Int Endod J; 2006 Dec; 39(12):931-9. PubMed ID: 17107537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Changes in diameter, cross-sectional area, and extent of canal-wall touching on using 3 instrumentation techniques in long-oval canals.
    Hilaly Eid GE; Wanees Amin SA
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2011 Nov; 112(5):688-95. PubMed ID: 21862367
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Root canal cleanliness after preparation with different endodontic handpieces and hand instruments: a comparative SEM investigation.
    Hülsmann M; Rümmelin C; Schäfers F
    J Endod; 1997 May; 23(5):301-6. PubMed ID: 9545932
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evaluation of smear layer: a comparison of automated image analysis versus expert observers.
    George R; Rutley EB; Walsh LJ
    J Endod; 2008 Aug; 34(8):999-1002. PubMed ID: 18634934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Scanning electron microscopic preliminary study of the efficacy of SmearClear and EDTA for smear layer removal after root canal instrumentation in permanent teeth.
    da Silva LA; Sanguino AC; Rocha CT; Leonardo MR; Silva RA
    J Endod; 2008 Dec; 34(12):1541-4. PubMed ID: 19026891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The effectiveness of different acid irrigating solutions in root canal cleaning after hand and rotary instrumentation.
    Pérez-Heredia M; Ferrer-Luque CM; González-Rodríguez MP
    J Endod; 2006 Oct; 32(10):993-7. PubMed ID: 16982281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Post space debridement in oval-shaped canals: the use of a new ultrasonic tip with oval section.
    Coniglio I; Carvalho CA; Magni E; Cantoro A; Ferrari M
    J Endod; 2008 Jun; 34(6):752-5. PubMed ID: 18498906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Efficacy of the NaviTip FX irrigation needle in removing post instrumentation canal smear layer and debris in curved root canals.
    Zmener O; Pameijer CH; Serrano SA; Palo RM; Iglesias EF
    J Endod; 2009 Sep; 35(9):1270-3. PubMed ID: 19720229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.