447 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17707278)
1. Comparison of plan quality provided by intensity-modulated arc therapy and helical tomotherapy.
Cao D; Holmes TW; Afghan MK; Shepard DM
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2007 Sep; 69(1):240-50. PubMed ID: 17707278
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Helical tomotherapy versus single-arc intensity-modulated arc therapy: a collaborative dosimetric comparison between two institutions.
Rong Y; Tang G; Welsh JS; Mohiuddin MM; Paliwal B; Yu CX
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2011 Sep; 81(1):284-96. PubMed ID: 21236598
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Dose-volume and biological-model based comparison between helical tomotherapy and (inverse-planned) IMAT for prostate tumours.
Iori M; Cattaneo GM; Cagni E; Fiorino C; Borasi G; Riccardo C; Iotti C; Fazio F; Nahum AE
Radiother Oncol; 2008 Jul; 88(1):34-45. PubMed ID: 18395811
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Clinical implementation of intensity-modulated arc therapy.
Yu CX; Li XA; Ma L; Chen D; Naqvi S; Shepard D; Sarfaraz M; Holmes TW; Suntharalingam M; Mansfield CM
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2002 Jun; 53(2):453-63. PubMed ID: 12023150
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Treatment planning strategy for whole-brain radiotherapy with hippocampal sparing and simultaneous integrated boost for multiple brain metastases using intensity-modulated arc therapy.
Pokhrel D; Sood S; McClinton C; Shen X; Lominska C; Saleh H; Badkul R; Jiang H; Mitchell M; Wang F
Med Dosim; 2016 Winter; 41(4):315-322. PubMed ID: 27692518
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Helical tomotherapy to LINAC plan conversion utilizing RayStation Fallback planning.
Zhang X; Penagaricano J; Narayanasamy G; Corry P; Liu T; Sanjay M; Paudel N; Morrill S
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2017 Jan; 18(1):178-185. PubMed ID: 28291935
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Treatment plan comparison between helical tomotherapy and MLC-based IMRT using radiobiological measures.
Mavroidis P; Ferreira BC; Shi C; Lind BK; Papanikolaou N
Phys Med Biol; 2007 Jul; 52(13):3817-36. PubMed ID: 17664579
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Incorporating geometric ray tracing to generate initial conditions for intensity modulated arc therapy optimization.
Oliver M; Gladwish A; Craig J; Chen J; Wong E
Med Phys; 2008 Jul; 35(7):3137-50. PubMed ID: 18697539
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparing radiation treatments using intensity-modulated beams, multiple arcs, and single arcs.
Tang G; Earl MA; Luan S; Wang C; Mohiuddin MM; Yu CX
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2010 Apr; 76(5):1554-62. PubMed ID: 20338482
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Intensity modulated arc therapy implementation in a three phase adaptive (18)F-FDG-PET voxel intensity-based planning strategy for head-and-neck cancer.
Berwouts D; Olteanu LA; Speleers B; Duprez F; Madani I; Vercauteren T; De Neve W; De Gersem W
Radiat Oncol; 2016 Apr; 11():52. PubMed ID: 27039294
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Impact of leaf motion constraints on IMAT plan quality, deliver accuracy, and efficiency.
Chen F; Rao M; Ye JS; Shepard DM; Cao D
Med Phys; 2011 Nov; 38(11):6106-18. PubMed ID: 22047375
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Dosimetric comparison of helical tomotherapy, RapidArc, and a novel IMRT & Arc technique for esophageal carcinoma.
Martin S; Chen JZ; Rashid Dar A; Yartsev S
Radiother Oncol; 2011 Dec; 101(3):431-7. PubMed ID: 21962823
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) dosimetry of the head and neck: a comparison of treatment plans using linear accelerator-based IMRT and helical tomotherapy.
Sheng K; Molloy JA; Read PW
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2006 Jul; 65(3):917-23. PubMed ID: 16751074
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Is IMAT the ultimate evolution of conformal radiotherapy? Dosimetric comparison of helical tomotherapy and volumetric modulated arc therapy for oropharyngeal cancer in a planning study.
Servagi Vernat S; Ali D; Puyraveau M; Viard R; Lisbona A; Fenoglietto P; Bedos L; Makovicka L; Giraud P
Phys Med; 2014 May; 30(3):280-5. PubMed ID: 23948367
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Helical tomotherapy for head and neck squamous cell carcinoma: dosimetric comparison with linear accelerator-based step-and-shoot IMRT.
Murthy V; Master Z; Gupta T; Ghosh-Laskar S; Budrukkar A; Phurailatpam R; Agarwal J
J Cancer Res Ther; 2010; 6(2):194-8. PubMed ID: 20622367
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of linac based fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy and tomotherapy treatment plans for skull-base tumors.
Soisson ET; Tomé WA; Richards GM; Mehta MP
Radiother Oncol; 2006 Mar; 78(3):313-21. PubMed ID: 16490269
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Dosimetric comparisons of helical tomotherapy treatment plans and step-and-shoot intensity-modulated radiosurgery treatment plans in intracranial stereotactic radiosurgery.
Han C; Liu A; Schultheiss TE; Pezner RD; Chen YJ; Wong JY
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2006 Jun; 65(2):608-16. PubMed ID: 16690442
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Dosimetric effect of small bowel oral contrast on conventional radiation therapy, linear accelerator-based intensity modulated radiation therapy, and helical tomotherapy plans for rectal cancer.
Joseph K; Liu D; Severin D; Dickey M; Polkosnik LA; Warkentin H; Mihai A; Ghosh S; Field C
Pract Radiat Oncol; 2015; 5(2):e95-102. PubMed ID: 25413403
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Leaf-sequencing for intensity-modulated arc therapy using graph algorithms.
Luan S; Wang C; Cao D; Chen DZ; Shepard DM; Yu CX
Med Phys; 2008 Jan; 35(1):61-9. PubMed ID: 18293562
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. IMAT-SIM: a new method for the clinical dosimetry of intensity-modulated arc therapy (IMAT).
Iori M; Cagni E; Nahum AE; Borasi G
Med Phys; 2007 Jul; 34(7):2759-73. PubMed ID: 17821983
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
