1479 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17707427)
1. Which is better--retroperitoneoscopic or laparoscopic dismembered pyeloplasty in children?
Canon SJ; Jayanthi VR; Lowe GJ
J Urol; 2007 Oct; 178(4 Pt 2):1791-5; discussion 1795. PubMed ID: 17707427
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Our experience with retroperitoneal and transperitoneal laparoscopic pyeloplasty for pelvi-ureteric junction obstruction.
Davenport K; Minervini A; Timoney AG; Keeley FX
Eur Urol; 2005 Dec; 48(6):973-7. PubMed ID: 16171940
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Laparoscopic pyeloplasty for secondary ureteropelvic junction obstruction.
Sundaram CP; Grubb RL; Rehman J; Yan Y; Chen C; Landman J; McDougall EM; Clayman RV
J Urol; 2003 Jun; 169(6):2037-40. PubMed ID: 12771713
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. One-port retroperitoneoscopic assisted pyeloplasty versus open dismembered pyeloplasty in young children: preliminary experience.
Caione P; Lais A; Nappo SG
J Urol; 2010 Nov; 184(5):2109-15. PubMed ID: 20851429
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Retroperitoneoscopic pyeloplasty: using reconstructive methods based on intraoperative findings.
Kawa G; Tatsumi M; Hiura Y; Muguruma K; Kinoshita H; Matsuda T
Int J Urol; 2006 Sep; 13(9):1171-4. PubMed ID: 16984547
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Transperitoneal laparoscopic pyeloplasty for primary repair of ureteropelvic junction obstruction in infants and children: comparison with open surgery.
Piaggio LA; Franc-Guimond J; Noh PH; Wehry M; Figueroa TE; Barthold J; González R
J Urol; 2007 Oct; 178(4 Pt 2):1579-83. PubMed ID: 17707047
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Retrospective comparison of retroperitoneal laparoscopic versus open dismembered pyeloplasty for ureteropelvic junction obstruction.
Zhang X; Li HZ; Ma X; Zheng T; Lang B; Zhang J; Fu B; Xu K; Guo XL
J Urol; 2006 Sep; 176(3):1077-80. PubMed ID: 16890694
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Retroperitoneoscopic vs open dismembered pyeloplasty for ureteropelvic junction obstruction in children.
Valla JS; Breaud J; Griffin SJ; Sautot-Vial N; Beretta F; Guana R; Gelas T; Carpentier X; Leculee R; Steyaert H
J Pediatr Urol; 2009 Oct; 5(5):368-73. PubMed ID: 19369118
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Minimally invasive treatment of ureteropelvic junction obstruction: long-term experience with an algorithm for laser endopyelotomy and laparoscopic retroperitoneal pyeloplasty.
Rassweiler JJ; Subotic S; Feist-Schwenk M; Sugiono M; Schulze M; Teber D; Frede T
J Urol; 2007 Mar; 177(3):1000-5. PubMed ID: 17296396
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Laparoscopy versus dorsal lumbotomy for ureteropelvic junction obstruction repair.
Troxel S; Das S; Helfer E; Nugyen M
J Urol; 2006 Sep; 176(3):1073-6. PubMed ID: 16890693
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Outcome analysis and cost comparison between externalized pyeloureteral and standard stents in 470 consecutive open pyeloplasties.
Braga LH; Lorenzo AJ; Farhat WA; Bägli DJ; Khoury AE; Pippi Salle JL
J Urol; 2008 Oct; 180(4 Suppl):1693-8; discussion1698-9. PubMed ID: 18708220
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Retroperitoneoscopic dismembered pyeloplasty in children].
Guo HQ; Gan WD; Li XG; Lian HB; Sun ZY
Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2006 Jul; 44(14):960-2. PubMed ID: 17074205
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Usefulness of short-term retrievable ureteral stent in pediatric laparoscopic pyeloplasty.
Yucel S; Samuelson ML; Nguyen MT; Baker LA
J Urol; 2007 Feb; 177(2):720-5; discussion 725. PubMed ID: 17222666
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Laparoscopic dismembered pyeloplasty in children younger than 2 years.
Cascio S; Tien A; Chee W; Tan HL
J Urol; 2007 Jan; 177(1):335-8. PubMed ID: 17162086
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Endopyeloplasty versus endopyelotomy versus laparoscopic pyeloplasty for primary ureteropelvic junction obstruction.
Desai MM; Desai MR; Gill IS
Urology; 2004 Jul; 64(1):16-21; discussion 21. PubMed ID: 15245924
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Transmesenteric laparoscopic pyeloplasty.
Romero FR; Wagner AA; Trapp C; Permpongkosol S; Muntener M; Link RE; Kavoussi LR
J Urol; 2006 Dec; 176(6 Pt 1):2526-9. PubMed ID: 17085149
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Laparoscopic pyeloplasty versus antegrade endopyelotomy: comparison in 100 patients and a new algorithm for the minimally invasive treatment of ureteropelvic junction obstruction.
Ost MC; Kaye JD; Guttman MJ; Lee BR; Smith AD
Urology; 2005 Nov; 66(5 Suppl):47-51. PubMed ID: 16194707
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Combination of laparoscopic and open procedure in dismembered pyeloplasty: report of 51 cases.
Gao ZL; Shi L; Yang MS; Wang L; Yang DD; Sun DK; Liu QZ; Men CP; Wu JT; Zhang P
Chin Med J (Engl); 2006 May; 119(10):840-4. PubMed ID: 16732987
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Risk factors for recurrent ureteropelvic junction obstruction after open pyeloplasty in a large pediatric cohort.
Braga LH; Lorenzo AJ; Bägli DJ; Keays M; Farhat WA; Khoury AE; Salle JL
J Urol; 2008 Oct; 180(4 Suppl):1684-7; discussion 1687-8. PubMed ID: 18708226
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Pediatric robot assisted retroperitoneoscopic pyeloplasty: a 5-year experience.
Olsen LH; Rawashdeh YF; Jorgensen TM
J Urol; 2007 Nov; 178(5):2137-41; discussion 2141. PubMed ID: 17870122
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
