126 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17708327)
41. The institutional review board: a brief history of attempts to protect human subjects in research.
Buelow PA
Clin Nurse Spec; 2011; 25(6):277-80. PubMed ID: 22016013
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
42. The American Hospital Quest for Quality Prize.
Runy LA
Trustee; 2002 Oct; 55(9):15-20, 1. PubMed ID: 12385129
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Institutional review board reform.
Kornfeld DS
N Engl J Med; 2002 Oct; 347(16):1285-6. PubMed ID: 12397663
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
44. Research in the hospital setting on human subjects. Protecting the patient and the institution.
Scheuer R
Mt Sinai J Med; 1993 Oct; 60(5):391-8. PubMed ID: 8259119
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Institute of Medicine study puts the spotlight on patient safety issues.
Berdahl A
Hosp Outlook; 2000 Feb; 3(2):6. PubMed ID: 11066307
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
46. Safety and satisfaction: the state of our health care system.
Gennaro S
AWHONN Lifelines; 2005; 9(2):152-4. PubMed ID: 15926274
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
47. When a research subject calls with a complaint, what will the institutional review board do?
Motil KJ; Allen J; Taylor A
IRB; 2004; 26(1):9-13. PubMed ID: 15281212
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
48. Embracing National Patient Safety Goals, part 1 of 2.
Mooney MC
Nurs Manage; 2003 Aug; 34(8):20-1. PubMed ID: 12888726
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Benchmarking and safety: natural fit if you know what to do with data.
Healthcare Benchmarks Qual Improv; 2004 May; 11(5):49-52. PubMed ID: 15152578
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Quality of care and the 'low hanging fruit'. Simple principles to alleviate human factor errors.
Curtin L; Simpson RL
Health Manag Technol; 2000 Sep; 21(9):48-9. PubMed ID: 11187260
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
51. What you can do: the trustee, patient safety, and JCAHO.
Schyve PM
Trustee; 2003 Feb; 56(2):19-21, 1. PubMed ID: 12624881
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Make these changes to improve safety.
Hosp Peer Rev; 2004 May; 29(5):68-9. PubMed ID: 15162675
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
53. Patient safety. BPOC technology: an answer to new JCAHO safety goals.
Reeder L
Trustee; 2003 Feb; 56(2):23-4. PubMed ID: 12624882
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
54. Quality and patient safety: governance at the crossroads.
Gribbin JT
Trustee; 2007 Sep; 60(8):34, 36. PubMed ID: 17926635
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
55. Patient safety in north america: beyond "operate through your initials" and "sign your site".
Wong DA; Lewis B; Herndon J; Martin C; Brooks R
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2009 Jun; 91(6):1534-41. PubMed ID: 19487535
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
56. Faculty guide to the institutional review board process.
Kaktins NM
Nurse Educ; 2009; 34(6):244-8. PubMed ID: 19901736
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Health care safety and quality: where have we been and where are we going?
Barraclough BH; Birch J
Med J Aust; 2006 May; 184(S10):S48-50. PubMed ID: 16719736
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Quality. Board leadership for patient safety: new JCAHO standards.
Reinbold O
Trustee; 2001 Jun; 54(6):35-6. PubMed ID: 11417007
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
59. Patient protection in a new light. Ground-breaking IOM report refocuses the health care debate.
Droste T
Healthplan; 2000; 41(2):30-40. PubMed ID: 10977687
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
60. Quality improvement or research: a distinction without a difference?
Doezema D; Hauswald M
IRB; 2002; 24(4):9-12. PubMed ID: 13678030
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
