These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
71 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1770895)
1. [Acute adverse effects and complications of central venous digital subtraction angiography (DSA). Results of 2,600 studies]. Gross-Fengels W; Beyer D; Fischbach R; Lanfermann H Med Klin (Munich); 1991 Nov; 86(11):561-5. PubMed ID: 1770895 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Complications of intravenous digital subtraction angiography--results in 500 patients]. Gross-Fengels W; Neufang KF; Beyer D; Steinbrich W Rontgenblatter; 1987 Sep; 40(9):281-5. PubMed ID: 3310189 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Undesirable side effects of contrast media during i.v. DSA--a comparison of 2 nonionic contrast media]. Gross-Fengels W; Neufang KF; Siebert C; Lanfermann H; Steinbrich W Rontgenblatter; 1990 Apr; 43(4):144-9. PubMed ID: 2187230 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Tolerance of iopromide in angiography: a multicenter study. Langer M; Behrends B; Langer R; Eichstädt H; Jänicke UA Fortschr Geb Rontgenstrahlen Nuklearmed Erganzungsbd; 1989; 128():61-6. PubMed ID: 2568810 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Clinical experience with iobitridol 250-300 in digital subtraction angiography. Double-blind randomized studies vs. iopromide and iohexol. Bouard JC; Lyonnet D; Illes JP; Bouard-Monnier C; Rouviere O; Pangaud C Acta Radiol Suppl; 1996; 400():85-8. PubMed ID: 8619361 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Delayed hypersensitivity reaction after infusion of nonionic intravenous contrast material for an excretory urogram: a case report and review of the literature. Stovsky MD; Seftel AD; Resnick MI J Urol; 1995 May; 153(5):1641-3. PubMed ID: 7714996 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Intravenous digital subtraction angiography with iohexol (Omnipaque) and sodium meglumin diatrizoate (Urografin). Karle A; Fries J; Laulund S; Andrew E Diagn Imaging Clin Med; 1986; 55(6):352-9. PubMed ID: 3545629 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Initial experience with a nonionic, dimeric contrast medium (iotrolan) in direct and indirect arteriography: a randomized, intraindividual double-blind study in 60 patients. Hagen B; Wenzel-Hora BI Fortschr Geb Rontgenstrahlen Nuklearmed Erganzungsbd; 1989; 128():54-60. PubMed ID: 2568808 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Catheter-induced atrial thrombi following central contrast medium injection in venous DSA]. Kaltenborn HA; Brunier A; Zocholl G; Erbel R Rontgenpraxis; 1989 Dec; 42(12):412-4. PubMed ID: 2595480 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. [Contrast media in venous digital angiography: ionic or non-ionic?]. Stacul F; Magnaldi S; Pozzi-Mucelli R; Muner G; Dalla Palma L Radiol Med; 1986 Nov; 72(11):815-22. PubMed ID: 3786845 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Gadodiamide as an alternative contrast agent in intravenous digital subtraction angiography and interventional procedures of the upper extremity veins. Sancak T; Bilgic S; Sanldilek U Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol; 2002; 25(1):49-52. PubMed ID: 11907774 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Are nonionic contrast media identical in their tolerability? Results of a double-blind randomized multicenter study with iomeprol and iopromide]. Schmiedel E Aktuelle Radiol; 1997 Jul; 7(4):183-8. PubMed ID: 9340014 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Prevalence of acute reactions to iopromide: postmarketing surveillance study of 74,717 patients. Kopp AF; Mortele KJ; Cho YD; Palkowitsch P; Bettmann MA; Claussen CD Acta Radiol; 2008 Oct; 49(8):902-11. PubMed ID: 18651252 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Contrast administration and techniques of digital subtraction angiography performance. Saddekni S; Sos TA; Srur M; Cohn DJ Radiol Clin North Am; 1985 Jun; 23(2):275-91. PubMed ID: 3887486 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Cardiac complications of intravenous digital angiography. Comparison of ionic and nonionic contrast media]. Stacul F; Marass P; Pozzi Mucelli R; Predonzan F; Magnaldi S; Abbona M Radiol Med; 1985; 71(1-2):40-3. PubMed ID: 4023305 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. CT angiography with three-dimensional techniques for the early diagnosis of intracranial aneurysms. Comparison with intra-arterial DSA and the surgical findings. Karamessini MT; Kagadis GC; Petsas T; Karnabatidis D; Konstantinou D; Sakellaropoulos GC; Nikiforidis GC; Siablis D Eur J Radiol; 2004 Mar; 49(3):212-23. PubMed ID: 14962650 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Contrast-induced encephalopathy following coronary angioplasty with iohexol. Sawaya RA; Hammoud R; Arnaout S; Alam S South Med J; 2007 Oct; 100(10):1054-5. PubMed ID: 17943057 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Relative safety of intravenous digital subtraction angiography over other methods of carotid angiography and impact on clinical management of cerebrovascular disease. Stevens JM; Barter S; Kerslake R; Schneidau A; Barber C; Thomas DJ Br J Radiol; 1989 Sep; 62(741):813-6. PubMed ID: 2790421 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Experimental and clinical studies of non-ionic isoosmolality contrast medium (iohexol 140)--II. IADSA in clinical practice]. Tajima N Nihon Igaku Hoshasen Gakkai Zasshi; 1986 Apr; 46(4):541-52. PubMed ID: 3532027 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Neurologic complications of cerebral angiography. A retrospective study of complication rate and patient risk factors. Leffers AM; Wagner A Acta Radiol; 2000 May; 41(3):204-10. PubMed ID: 10866072 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]