75 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1770895)
1. [Acute adverse effects and complications of central venous digital subtraction angiography (DSA). Results of 2,600 studies].
Gross-Fengels W; Beyer D; Fischbach R; Lanfermann H
Med Klin (Munich); 1991 Nov; 86(11):561-5. PubMed ID: 1770895
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. [Complications of intravenous digital subtraction angiography--results in 500 patients].
Gross-Fengels W; Neufang KF; Beyer D; Steinbrich W
Rontgenblatter; 1987 Sep; 40(9):281-5. PubMed ID: 3310189
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [Undesirable side effects of contrast media during i.v. DSA--a comparison of 2 nonionic contrast media].
Gross-Fengels W; Neufang KF; Siebert C; Lanfermann H; Steinbrich W
Rontgenblatter; 1990 Apr; 43(4):144-9. PubMed ID: 2187230
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Tolerance of iopromide in angiography: a multicenter study.
Langer M; Behrends B; Langer R; Eichstädt H; Jänicke UA
Fortschr Geb Rontgenstrahlen Nuklearmed Erganzungsbd; 1989; 128():61-6. PubMed ID: 2568810
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Clinical experience with iobitridol 250-300 in digital subtraction angiography. Double-blind randomized studies vs. iopromide and iohexol.
Bouard JC; Lyonnet D; Illes JP; Bouard-Monnier C; Rouviere O; Pangaud C
Acta Radiol Suppl; 1996; 400():85-8. PubMed ID: 8619361
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Delayed hypersensitivity reaction after infusion of nonionic intravenous contrast material for an excretory urogram: a case report and review of the literature.
Stovsky MD; Seftel AD; Resnick MI
J Urol; 1995 May; 153(5):1641-3. PubMed ID: 7714996
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Intravenous digital subtraction angiography with iohexol (Omnipaque) and sodium meglumin diatrizoate (Urografin).
Karle A; Fries J; Laulund S; Andrew E
Diagn Imaging Clin Med; 1986; 55(6):352-9. PubMed ID: 3545629
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Initial experience with a nonionic, dimeric contrast medium (iotrolan) in direct and indirect arteriography: a randomized, intraindividual double-blind study in 60 patients.
Hagen B; Wenzel-Hora BI
Fortschr Geb Rontgenstrahlen Nuklearmed Erganzungsbd; 1989; 128():54-60. PubMed ID: 2568808
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Catheter-induced atrial thrombi following central contrast medium injection in venous DSA].
Kaltenborn HA; Brunier A; Zocholl G; Erbel R
Rontgenpraxis; 1989 Dec; 42(12):412-4. PubMed ID: 2595480
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. [Contrast media in venous digital angiography: ionic or non-ionic?].
Stacul F; Magnaldi S; Pozzi-Mucelli R; Muner G; Dalla Palma L
Radiol Med; 1986 Nov; 72(11):815-22. PubMed ID: 3786845
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Gadodiamide as an alternative contrast agent in intravenous digital subtraction angiography and interventional procedures of the upper extremity veins.
Sancak T; Bilgic S; Sanldilek U
Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol; 2002; 25(1):49-52. PubMed ID: 11907774
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Are nonionic contrast media identical in their tolerability? Results of a double-blind randomized multicenter study with iomeprol and iopromide].
Schmiedel E
Aktuelle Radiol; 1997 Jul; 7(4):183-8. PubMed ID: 9340014
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Prevalence of acute reactions to iopromide: postmarketing surveillance study of 74,717 patients.
Kopp AF; Mortele KJ; Cho YD; Palkowitsch P; Bettmann MA; Claussen CD
Acta Radiol; 2008 Oct; 49(8):902-11. PubMed ID: 18651252
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Contrast administration and techniques of digital subtraction angiography performance.
Saddekni S; Sos TA; Srur M; Cohn DJ
Radiol Clin North Am; 1985 Jun; 23(2):275-91. PubMed ID: 3887486
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Cardiac complications of intravenous digital angiography. Comparison of ionic and nonionic contrast media].
Stacul F; Marass P; Pozzi Mucelli R; Predonzan F; Magnaldi S; Abbona M
Radiol Med; 1985; 71(1-2):40-3. PubMed ID: 4023305
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. CT angiography with three-dimensional techniques for the early diagnosis of intracranial aneurysms. Comparison with intra-arterial DSA and the surgical findings.
Karamessini MT; Kagadis GC; Petsas T; Karnabatidis D; Konstantinou D; Sakellaropoulos GC; Nikiforidis GC; Siablis D
Eur J Radiol; 2004 Mar; 49(3):212-23. PubMed ID: 14962650
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Contrast-induced encephalopathy following coronary angioplasty with iohexol.
Sawaya RA; Hammoud R; Arnaout S; Alam S
South Med J; 2007 Oct; 100(10):1054-5. PubMed ID: 17943057
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Relative safety of intravenous digital subtraction angiography over other methods of carotid angiography and impact on clinical management of cerebrovascular disease.
Stevens JM; Barter S; Kerslake R; Schneidau A; Barber C; Thomas DJ
Br J Radiol; 1989 Sep; 62(741):813-6. PubMed ID: 2790421
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Experimental and clinical studies of non-ionic isoosmolality contrast medium (iohexol 140)--II. IADSA in clinical practice].
Tajima N
Nihon Igaku Hoshasen Gakkai Zasshi; 1986 Apr; 46(4):541-52. PubMed ID: 3532027
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Neurologic complications of cerebral angiography. A retrospective study of complication rate and patient risk factors.
Leffers AM; Wagner A
Acta Radiol; 2000 May; 41(3):204-10. PubMed ID: 10866072
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
