These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

149 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17709072)

  • 1. Accuracy of measurements and reliability of landmark identification with computed tomography (CT) techniques in the maxillofacial area: a systematic review.
    Lou L; Lagravere MO; Compton S; Major PW; Flores-Mir C
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2007 Sep; 104(3):402-11. PubMed ID: 17709072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Landmark identification error in posteroanterior cephalometric radiography. A systematic review.
    Leonardi R; Annunziata A; Caltabiano M
    Angle Orthod; 2008 Jul; 78(4):761-5. PubMed ID: 18302479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Long-term skeletal changes with rapid maxillary expansion: a systematic review.
    Lagravere MO; Major PW; Flores-Mir C
    Angle Orthod; 2005 Nov; 75(6):1046-52. PubMed ID: 16448254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. 3-D volume rendering maxillofacial analysis of angular measurements by multislice CT.
    Lopes PM; Moreira CR; Perrella A; Antunes JL; Cavalcanti MG
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2008 Feb; 105(2):224-30. PubMed ID: 18230391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Accuracy of three-dimensional (3D) craniofacial cephalometric landmarks on a low-dose 3D computed tomograph.
    Olszewski R; Reychler H; Cosnard G; Denis JM; Vynckier S; Zech F
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2008 Jul; 37(5):261-7. PubMed ID: 18606747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effects of image enhancement on reliability of landmark identification in digital cephalometry.
    Oshagh M; Shahidi SH; Danaei SH
    Indian J Dent Res; 2013; 24(1):98-103. PubMed ID: 23852241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Reproducibility of maxillofacial anatomic landmarks on 3-dimensional computed tomographic images determined with the 95% confidence ellipse method.
    Muramatsu A; Nawa H; Kimura M; Yoshida K; Maeda M; Katsumata A; Ariji E; Goto S
    Angle Orthod; 2008 May; 78(3):396-402. PubMed ID: 18416622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A proposal for a new analysis of craniofacial morphology by 3-dimensional computed tomography.
    Park SH; Yu HS; Kim KD; Lee KJ; Baik HS
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2006 May; 129(5):600.e23-34. PubMed ID: 16679198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Skeletal and dental changes in Class II division 1 malocclusions treated with splint-type Herbst appliances. A systematic review.
    Flores-Mir C; Ayeh A; Goswani A; Charkhandeh S
    Angle Orthod; 2007 Mar; 77(2):376-81. PubMed ID: 17319777
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Phosphor-stimulated computed cephalometry: reliability of landmark identification.
    Lim KF; Foong KW
    Br J Orthod; 1997 Nov; 24(4):301-8. PubMed ID: 9459029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Reproducibility of three-dimensional CT-assisted model production in the maxillofacial area.
    Lill W; Solar P; Ulm C; Watzek G; Blahout R; Matejka M
    Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 1992 Aug; 30(4):233-6. PubMed ID: 1510897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Assessment of 3-dimensional computer-generated cephalometric measurements.
    Kusnoto B; Evans CA; BeGole EA; de Rijk W
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1999 Oct; 116(4):390-9. PubMed ID: 10511666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of the reliability of craniofacial anatomic landmarks based on cephalometric radiographs and three-dimensional CT scans.
    Kragskov J; Bosch C; Gyldensted C; Sindet-Pedersen S
    Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 1997 Mar; 34(2):111-6. PubMed ID: 9138504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Standardization of 3-D CT measurements for length and angles by matrix transformation in the 3-D coordinate system.
    Kitaura H; Yonetsu K; Kitamori H; Kobayashi K; Nakamura T
    Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 2000 Jul; 37(4):349-56. PubMed ID: 10912713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Three-dimensional Bolton-Brush Growth Study landmark data: ontogeny and sexual dimorphism of the Bolton standards cohort.
    Dean D; Hans MG; Bookstein FL; Subramanyan K
    Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 2000 Mar; 37(2):145-56. PubMed ID: 10749055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Landmark identification error in posterior anterior cephalometrics.
    Major PW; Johnson DE; Hesse KL; Glover KE
    Angle Orthod; 1994; 64(6):447-54. PubMed ID: 7864466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Accuracy and reliability of landmark-based, surface-based and voxel-based 3D cone-beam computed tomography superimposition methods.
    Ghoneima A; Cho H; Farouk K; Kula K
    Orthod Craniofac Res; 2017 Nov; 20(4):227-236. PubMed ID: 28960842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Linear accuracy and reliability of cone beam CT derived 3-dimensional images constructed using an orthodontic volumetric rendering program.
    Periago DR; Scarfe WC; Moshiri M; Scheetz JP; Silveira AM; Farman AG
    Angle Orthod; 2008 May; 78(3):387-95. PubMed ID: 18416632
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Craniofacial measurements based on 3D-CT volume rendering: implications for clinical applications.
    Cavalcanti MG; Rocha SS; Vannier MW
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2004 May; 33(3):170-6. PubMed ID: 15371317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The reliability of using postero-anterior cephalometry and cone-beam CT to determine transverse dimensions in clinical practice.
    Tai B; Goonewardene MS; Murray K; Koong B; Islam SM
    Aust Orthod J; 2014 Nov; 30(2):132-42. PubMed ID: 25549515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.