220 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17709364)
1. A method to optimize the processing algorithm of a computed radiography system for chest radiography.
Moore CS; Liney GP; Beavis AW; Saunderson JR
Br J Radiol; 2007 Sep; 80(957):724-30. PubMed ID: 17709364
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Investigation of optimum X-ray beam tube voltage and filtration for chest radiography with a computed radiography system.
Moore CS; Beavis AW; Saunderson JR
Br J Radiol; 2008 Oct; 81(970):771-7. PubMed ID: 18662964
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Assessment of an advanced image-based technique to calculate virtual monoenergetic computed tomographic images from a dual-energy examination to improve contrast-to-noise ratio in examinations using iodinated contrast media.
Grant KL; Flohr TG; Krauss B; Sedlmair M; Thomas C; Schmidt B
Invest Radiol; 2014 Sep; 49(9):586-92. PubMed ID: 24710203
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Image quality and dose differences caused by vendor-specific image processing of neonatal radiographs.
Sensakovic WF; O'Dell MC; Letter H; Kohler N; Rop B; Cook J; Logsdon G; Varich L
Pediatr Radiol; 2016 Oct; 46(11):1606-13. PubMed ID: 27488507
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Correlation between the signal-to-noise ratio improvement factor (KSNR) and clinical image quality for chest imaging with a computed radiography system.
Moore CS; Wood TJ; Saunderson JR; Beavis AW
Phys Med Biol; 2015 Dec; 60(23):9047-58. PubMed ID: 26540441
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Correlation of the clinical and physical image quality in chest radiography for average adults with a computed radiography imaging system.
Moore CS; Wood TJ; Beavis AW; Saunderson JR
Br J Radiol; 2013 Jul; 86(1027):20130077. PubMed ID: 23568362
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Initial phantom study comparing image quality in computed tomography using adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction and new adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction v.
Lim K; Kwon H; Cho J; Oh J; Yoon S; Kang M; Ha D; Lee J; Kang E
J Comput Assist Tomogr; 2015; 39(3):443-8. PubMed ID: 25654782
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Automatic quantitative low contrast analysis of digital chest phantom radiographs.
Kwan AL; Filipow LJ; Le LH
Med Phys; 2003 Mar; 30(3):312-20. PubMed ID: 12674230
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Optimisation of image plate radiography with respect to tube voltage.
Tingberg A; Sjöström D
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):286-93. PubMed ID: 15933123
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Upgrade to iterative image reconstruction (IR) in MDCT imaging: a clinical study for detailed parameter optimization beyond vendor recommendations using the adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction environment (ASIR) Part2: The chest.
Mueck FG; Michael L; Deak Z; Scherr MK; Maxien D; Geyer LL; Reiser M; Wirth S
Rofo; 2013 Jul; 185(7):644-54. PubMed ID: 23696019
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A novel registration method for interval change detection between two chest X-ray images with different rotation angles.
Shimizu A; Matsuo Y; Kobatake H
Acad Radiol; 2006 Apr; 13(4):503-11. PubMed ID: 16554231
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Finding-specific display presets for computed radiography soft-copy reading.
Andriole KP; Gould RG; Webb WR
J Digit Imaging; 1999 May; 12(2 Suppl 1):3-5. PubMed ID: 10342153
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Investigating the exposure class of a computed radiography system for optimisation of physical image quality for chest radiography.
Moore CS; Saunderson JR; Beavis AW
Br J Radiol; 2009 Aug; 82(981):705-10. PubMed ID: 19221185
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A Monte Carlo-based model for simulation of digital chest tomosynthesis.
Ullman G; Dance DR; Sandborg M; Carlsson GA; Svalkvist A; Båth M
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2010; 139(1-3):159-63. PubMed ID: 20203125
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Dose-image quality optimisation in digital chest radiography.
Doyle P; Martin CJ; Gentle D
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):269-72. PubMed ID: 15933120
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A phantom for dose-image quality optimization in chest radiography.
Vassileva J
Br J Radiol; 2002 Oct; 75(898):837-42. PubMed ID: 12381693
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Nodule detection in digital chest radiography: effect of system noise.
Håkansson M; Båth M; Börjesson S; Kheddache S; Johnsson AA; Månsson LG
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):97-101. PubMed ID: 15933088
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Assessment and optimisation of the image quality of chest-radiography systems.
Redlich U; Hoeschen C; Doehring W
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):264-8. PubMed ID: 15933119
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A phantom study of nodule size evaluation with chest tomosynthesis and computed tomography.
Johnsson AA; Svalkvist A; Vikgren J; Boijsen M; Flinck A; Kheddache S; Båth M
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2010; 139(1-3):140-3. PubMed ID: 20133329
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Introduction of an effective method for the optimization of CT protocols using iterative reconstruction algorithms: comparison with patient data.
Kordolaimi SD; Saradeas I; Ploussi A; Pantos I; Argentos S; Efstathopoulos EP
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2014 Oct; 203(4):W434-9. PubMed ID: 25247973
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
