These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

246 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17709574)

  • 21. [The effectiveness of the auditory training of the subjects presenting with partial deafness following cochlear implantation as reported by the patients and speech therapists].
    Solnitsa I; Kobosko I; Pankovska A; Skarzhin'skiĭ PKh; Zdoga M; Skarzhin'skiĭ Kh
    Vestn Otorinolaringol; 2014; (4):25-30. PubMed ID: 25377673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Maximizing Cochlear Implant Outcomes with Short-Term Aural Rehabilitation.
    Bernstein CM; Brewer DM; Bakke MH; Olson AD; Machmer EJ; Spitzer JB; Schauer PC; Sydlowski SA; Levitt H
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2021 Mar; 32(3):144-156. PubMed ID: 33890268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Efficacy of Multiple-Talker Phonetic Identification Training in Postlingually Deafened Cochlear Implant Listeners.
    Miller SE; Zhang Y; Nelson PB
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2016 Feb; 59(1):90-8. PubMed ID: 26609904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. [Auditory group therapy in adult cochlear implant rehabilitation].
    Glaubitz C; Lehmann EK; Weber L; Kulke AM; Hoppe U
    HNO; 2019 Aug; 67(8):612-619. PubMed ID: 31065763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Musical background not associated with self-perceived hearing performance or speech perception in postlingual cochlear-implant users.
    Fuller C; Free R; Maat B; Başkent D
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Aug; 132(2):1009-16. PubMed ID: 22894221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Conversion of adult Nucleus® 5 cochlear implant users to the Nucleus® 6 system.
    De Ceulaer G; Swinnen F; Pascoal D; Philips B; Killian M; James C; Govaerts PJ; Dhooge I
    Cochlear Implants Int; 2015 Jul; 16(4):222-32. PubMed ID: 25284643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Perceptual benefit and functional outcomes for children using sequential bilateral cochlear implants.
    Galvin KL; Mok M; Dowell RC
    Ear Hear; 2007 Aug; 28(4):470-82. PubMed ID: 17609610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Perceptually optimized gain function for cochlear implant signal-to-noise ratio based noise reduction.
    Mauger SJ; Dawson PW; Hersbach AA
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2012 Jan; 131(1):327-36. PubMed ID: 22280595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Music mixing preferences of cochlear implant recipients: a pilot study.
    Buyens W; van Dijk B; Moonen M; Wouters J
    Int J Audiol; 2014 May; 53(5):294-301. PubMed ID: 24471410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Comb-filtered speech as a tool to demonstrate difficulties of speech perception and the importance of auditory training in cochlear implant users.
    Petrov SM; Pisareva NY
    Cochlear Implants Int; 2011 Feb; 12(1):48-52. PubMed ID: 21756459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. The Vienna cochlear implant program.
    Burian K; Hochmair-Desoyer IJ; Eisenwort B
    Otolaryngol Clin North Am; 1986 May; 19(2):313-28. PubMed ID: 3754952
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Importance of age and postimplantation experience on speech perception measures in children with sequential bilateral cochlear implants.
    Peters BR; Litovsky R; Parkinson A; Lake J
    Otol Neurotol; 2007 Aug; 28(5):649-57. PubMed ID: 17712290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Everyday listening questionnaire: correlation between subjective hearing and objective performance.
    Brendel M; Frohne-Buechner C; Lesinski-Schiedat A; Lenarz T; Buechner A
    Cochlear Implants Int; 2014 Jan; 15(1):13-9. PubMed ID: 23998527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Trimodal speech perception: how residual acoustic hearing supplements cochlear-implant consonant recognition in the presence of visual cues.
    Sheffield BM; Schuchman G; Bernstein JG
    Ear Hear; 2015; 36(3):e99-112. PubMed ID: 25514796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Relationships Among Peripheral and Central Electrophysiological Measures of Spatial and Spectral Selectivity and Speech Perception in Cochlear Implant Users.
    Scheperle RA; Abbas PJ
    Ear Hear; 2015; 36(4):441-53. PubMed ID: 25658746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Electrophysiological and speech perception measures of auditory processing in experienced adult cochlear implant users.
    Kelly AS; Purdy SC; Thorne PR
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2005 Jun; 116(6):1235-46. PubMed ID: 15978485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Effects of training on timbre recognition and appraisal by postlingually deafened cochlear implant recipients.
    Gfeller K; Witt S; Adamek M; Mehr M; Rogers J; Stordahl J; Ringgenberg S
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2002 Mar; 13(3):132-45. PubMed ID: 11936169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Comparing the effect of auditory-only and auditory-visual modes in two groups of Persian children using cochlear implants: a randomized clinical trial.
    Oryadi Zanjani MM; Hasanzadeh S; Rahgozar M; Shemshadi H; Purdy SC; Mahmudi Bakhtiari B; Vahab M
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2013 Sep; 77(9):1545-50. PubMed ID: 23896386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Estimation of vowel recognition with cochlear implant simulations.
    Liu C; Fu QJ
    IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2007 Jan; 54(1):74-81. PubMed ID: 17260858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Cortical neural activity underlying speech perception in postlingual adult cochlear implant recipients.
    Henkin Y; Tetin-Schneider S; Hildesheimer M; Kishon-Rabin L
    Audiol Neurootol; 2009; 14(1):39-53. PubMed ID: 18781063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.