These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

202 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17709811)

  • 1. Invalidity of "disconfirmation of the predictive validity of the self-appraisal questionnaire in a sample of high-risk drug offenders" (2006): a reply.
    Dhaliwal GK; Loza W; Reddon JR
    J Interpers Violence; 2007 Aug; 22(8):1077-89. PubMed ID: 17709811
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The myth of offenders' deception on self-report measure predicting recidivism: example from the Self-Appraisal Questionnaire (SAQ).
    Loza W; Loza-Fanous A; Heseltine K
    J Interpers Violence; 2007 Jun; 22(6):671-83. PubMed ID: 17515429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Long-term predictive validity of the risk matrix 2000: a comparison with the static-99 and the sex offender risk appraisal guide.
    Kingston DA; Yates PM; Firestone P; Babchishin K; Bradford JM
    Sex Abuse; 2008 Dec; 20(4):466-84. PubMed ID: 18840901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Cross-validation of the Self-Appraisal Questionnaire (SAQ): an offender risk and need assessment measure on Australian, British, Canadian, Singaporean, and American offenders.
    Loza W; Cumbleton A; Shahinfar A; Neo LH; Evans M; Conley M; Summers R
    J Interpers Violence; 2004 Oct; 19(10):1172-90. PubMed ID: 15358941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Sexual sadism and sadistic personality disorder in sexual homicide.
    Hill A; Habermann N; Berner W; Briken P
    J Pers Disord; 2006 Dec; 20(6):671-84. PubMed ID: 17192143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. An examination of the predictive validity of the risk matrix 2000 in England and wales.
    Barnett GD; Wakeling HC; Howard PD
    Sex Abuse; 2010 Dec; 22(4):443-70. PubMed ID: 20930189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Hostility and recidivism in sexual offenders.
    Firestone P; Nunes KL; Moulden H; Broom I; Bradford JM
    Arch Sex Behav; 2005 Jun; 34(3):277-83. PubMed ID: 15971010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Sex offender management using the polygraph: a critical review.
    Meijer EH; Verschuere B; Merckelbach HL; Crombez G
    Int J Law Psychiatry; 2008; 31(5):423-9. PubMed ID: 18789528
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A nine-year follow-up study on the predictive validity of the Self-Appraisal Questionnaire for predicting violent and nonviolent recidivism.
    Kingston WL; MacTavish A; Loza-Fanous A
    J Interpers Violence; 2007 Sep; 22(9):1144-55. PubMed ID: 17704460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Cross-validation of the Self-Appraisal Questionnaire with a maximum-security psychiatric population.
    Villeneuve DB; Oliver N; Loza W
    J Interpers Violence; 2003 Nov; 18(11):1325-34. PubMed ID: 19774768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Psychopathy, treatment change, and recidivism in high-risk, high-need sexual offenders.
    Looman J; Abracen J; Serin R; Marquis P
    J Interpers Violence; 2005 May; 20(5):549-68. PubMed ID: 15788554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of two risk assessment instruments for sexual offenders.
    Looman J
    Sex Abuse; 2006 Apr; 18(2):193-206. PubMed ID: 16598660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Two-, three-, and four-factor PCL-R models in applied sex offender risk assessments.
    Weaver CM; Meyer RG; Van Nort JJ; Tristan L
    Assessment; 2006 Jun; 13(2):208-16. PubMed ID: 16672735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Treatment of sexual offenders with psychopathic traits: recent research developments and clinical implications.
    Abracen J; Looman J; Langton CM
    Trauma Violence Abuse; 2008 Jul; 9(3):144-66. PubMed ID: 18495937
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Applying a forensic actuarial assessment (the Violence Risk Appraisal Guide) to nonforensic patients.
    Harris GT; Rice ME; Camilleri JA
    J Interpers Violence; 2004 Sep; 19(9):1063-74. PubMed ID: 15296617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Assessing risk for sexual recidivism: some proposals on the nature of psychologically meaningful risk factors.
    Mann RE; Hanson RK; Thornton D
    Sex Abuse; 2010 Jun; 22(2):191-217. PubMed ID: 20363981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Outcome evaluation of a high-intensity inpatient sex offender treatment program.
    Olver ME; Wong SC; Nicholaichuk TP
    J Interpers Violence; 2009 Mar; 24(3):522-36. PubMed ID: 18458350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Substance use disorders in forensic psychiatry: differences among different types of offenders.
    Kraanen FL; Scholing A; Emmelkamp PM
    Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol; 2012 Dec; 56(8):1201-19. PubMed ID: 21865224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Incarceration and recidivism among sexual offenders.
    Nunes KL; Firestone P; Wexler AF; Jensen TL; Bradford JM
    Law Hum Behav; 2007 Jun; 31(3):305-18. PubMed ID: 17203411
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Risk assessment in offenders with intellectual disability: a comparison across three levels of security.
    Lindsay WR; Hogue TE; Taylor JL; Steptoe L; Mooney P; O'Brien G; Johnston S; Smith AH
    Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol; 2008 Feb; 52(1):90-111. PubMed ID: 18174529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.