BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

230 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17710364)

  • 41. Prediction of amino acid positions specific for functional groups in a protein family based on local sequence similarity.
    Karasev DA; Veselovsky AV; Oparina NY; Filimonov DA; Sobolev BN
    J Mol Recognit; 2016 Apr; 29(4):159-69. PubMed ID: 26549790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. CoeViz: a web-based tool for coevolution analysis of protein residues.
    Baker FN; Porollo A
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2016 Mar; 17():119. PubMed ID: 26956673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Predicting DNA-binding amino acid residues from electrostatic stabilization upon mutation to Asp/Glu and evolutionary conservation.
    Chen YC; Wu CY; Lim C
    Proteins; 2007 May; 67(3):671-80. PubMed ID: 17340633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. H2r: identification of evolutionary important residues by means of an entropy based analysis of multiple sequence alignments.
    Merkl R; Zwick M
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2008 Mar; 9():151. PubMed ID: 18366663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. PSSM-based prediction of DNA binding sites in proteins.
    Ahmad S; Sarai A
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2005 Feb; 6():33. PubMed ID: 15720719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. PROMALS web server for accurate multiple protein sequence alignments.
    Pei J; Kim BH; Tang M; Grishin NV
    Nucleic Acids Res; 2007 Jul; 35(Web Server issue):W649-52. PubMed ID: 17452345
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Background frequencies for residue variability estimates: BLOSUM revisited.
    Mihalek I; Res I; Lichtarge O
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2007 Dec; 8():488. PubMed ID: 18162129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Sequence based residue depth prediction using evolutionary information and predicted secondary structure.
    Zhang H; Zhang T; Chen K; Shen S; Ruan J; Kurgan L
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2008 Sep; 9():388. PubMed ID: 18803867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. ConSurf: identification of functional regions in proteins by surface-mapping of phylogenetic information.
    Glaser F; Pupko T; Paz I; Bell RE; Bechor-Shental D; Martz E; Ben-Tal N
    Bioinformatics; 2003 Jan; 19(1):163-4. PubMed ID: 12499312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. A new method for quantifying residue conservation and its applications to the protein folding nucleus.
    Liu X; Li J; Guo W; Wang W
    Biochem Biophys Res Commun; 2006 Dec; 351(4):1031-6. PubMed ID: 17097065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Are residues in a protein folding nucleus evolutionarily conserved?
    Tseng YY; Liang J
    J Mol Biol; 2004 Jan; 335(4):869-80. PubMed ID: 14698285
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Variation in structural location and amino acid conservation of functional sites in protein domain families.
    Pils B; Copley RR; Schultz J
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2005 Aug; 6():210. PubMed ID: 16122386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. ConSurf-DB: An accessible repository for the evolutionary conservation patterns of the majority of PDB proteins.
    Ben Chorin A; Masrati G; Kessel A; Narunsky A; Sprinzak J; Lahav S; Ashkenazy H; Ben-Tal N
    Protein Sci; 2020 Jan; 29(1):258-267. PubMed ID: 31702846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Mutual information without the influence of phylogeny or entropy dramatically improves residue contact prediction.
    Dunn SD; Wahl LM; Gloor GB
    Bioinformatics; 2008 Feb; 24(3):333-40. PubMed ID: 18057019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Normalized feature vectors: a novel alignment-free sequence comparison method based on the numbers of adjacent amino acids.
    Huang DS; Yu HJ
    IEEE/ACM Trans Comput Biol Bioinform; 2013; 10(2):457-67. PubMed ID: 23929869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. A generalized affine gap model significantly improves protein sequence alignment accuracy.
    Zachariah MA; Crooks GE; Holbrook SR; Brenner SE
    Proteins; 2005 Feb; 58(2):329-38. PubMed ID: 15562515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Issues in predicting protein function from sequence.
    Ponting CP
    Brief Bioinform; 2001 Mar; 2(1):19-29. PubMed ID: 11465059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Semi-supervised prediction of protein interaction sites from unlabeled sample information.
    Wang Y; Mei C; Zhou Y; Wang Y; Zheng C; Zhen X; Xiong Y; Chen P; Zhang J; Wang B
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2019 Dec; 20(Suppl 25):699. PubMed ID: 31874616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Improving protein-protein interaction prediction using evolutionary information from low-quality MSAs.
    VĂ¡rnai C; Burkoff NS; Wild DL
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(2):e0169356. PubMed ID: 28166227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. The choice of sequence homologs included in multiple sequence alignments has a dramatic impact on evolutionary conservation analysis.
    Gil N; Fiser A
    Bioinformatics; 2019 Jan; 35(1):12-19. PubMed ID: 29947739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.