230 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17710364)
41. Prediction of amino acid positions specific for functional groups in a protein family based on local sequence similarity.
Karasev DA; Veselovsky AV; Oparina NY; Filimonov DA; Sobolev BN
J Mol Recognit; 2016 Apr; 29(4):159-69. PubMed ID: 26549790
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. CoeViz: a web-based tool for coevolution analysis of protein residues.
Baker FN; Porollo A
BMC Bioinformatics; 2016 Mar; 17():119. PubMed ID: 26956673
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Predicting DNA-binding amino acid residues from electrostatic stabilization upon mutation to Asp/Glu and evolutionary conservation.
Chen YC; Wu CY; Lim C
Proteins; 2007 May; 67(3):671-80. PubMed ID: 17340633
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. H2r: identification of evolutionary important residues by means of an entropy based analysis of multiple sequence alignments.
Merkl R; Zwick M
BMC Bioinformatics; 2008 Mar; 9():151. PubMed ID: 18366663
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. PSSM-based prediction of DNA binding sites in proteins.
Ahmad S; Sarai A
BMC Bioinformatics; 2005 Feb; 6():33. PubMed ID: 15720719
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. PROMALS web server for accurate multiple protein sequence alignments.
Pei J; Kim BH; Tang M; Grishin NV
Nucleic Acids Res; 2007 Jul; 35(Web Server issue):W649-52. PubMed ID: 17452345
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Background frequencies for residue variability estimates: BLOSUM revisited.
Mihalek I; Res I; Lichtarge O
BMC Bioinformatics; 2007 Dec; 8():488. PubMed ID: 18162129
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Sequence based residue depth prediction using evolutionary information and predicted secondary structure.
Zhang H; Zhang T; Chen K; Shen S; Ruan J; Kurgan L
BMC Bioinformatics; 2008 Sep; 9():388. PubMed ID: 18803867
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. ConSurf: identification of functional regions in proteins by surface-mapping of phylogenetic information.
Glaser F; Pupko T; Paz I; Bell RE; Bechor-Shental D; Martz E; Ben-Tal N
Bioinformatics; 2003 Jan; 19(1):163-4. PubMed ID: 12499312
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. A new method for quantifying residue conservation and its applications to the protein folding nucleus.
Liu X; Li J; Guo W; Wang W
Biochem Biophys Res Commun; 2006 Dec; 351(4):1031-6. PubMed ID: 17097065
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Are residues in a protein folding nucleus evolutionarily conserved?
Tseng YY; Liang J
J Mol Biol; 2004 Jan; 335(4):869-80. PubMed ID: 14698285
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Variation in structural location and amino acid conservation of functional sites in protein domain families.
Pils B; Copley RR; Schultz J
BMC Bioinformatics; 2005 Aug; 6():210. PubMed ID: 16122386
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. ConSurf-DB: An accessible repository for the evolutionary conservation patterns of the majority of PDB proteins.
Ben Chorin A; Masrati G; Kessel A; Narunsky A; Sprinzak J; Lahav S; Ashkenazy H; Ben-Tal N
Protein Sci; 2020 Jan; 29(1):258-267. PubMed ID: 31702846
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Mutual information without the influence of phylogeny or entropy dramatically improves residue contact prediction.
Dunn SD; Wahl LM; Gloor GB
Bioinformatics; 2008 Feb; 24(3):333-40. PubMed ID: 18057019
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Normalized feature vectors: a novel alignment-free sequence comparison method based on the numbers of adjacent amino acids.
Huang DS; Yu HJ
IEEE/ACM Trans Comput Biol Bioinform; 2013; 10(2):457-67. PubMed ID: 23929869
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. A generalized affine gap model significantly improves protein sequence alignment accuracy.
Zachariah MA; Crooks GE; Holbrook SR; Brenner SE
Proteins; 2005 Feb; 58(2):329-38. PubMed ID: 15562515
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Issues in predicting protein function from sequence.
Ponting CP
Brief Bioinform; 2001 Mar; 2(1):19-29. PubMed ID: 11465059
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Semi-supervised prediction of protein interaction sites from unlabeled sample information.
Wang Y; Mei C; Zhou Y; Wang Y; Zheng C; Zhen X; Xiong Y; Chen P; Zhang J; Wang B
BMC Bioinformatics; 2019 Dec; 20(Suppl 25):699. PubMed ID: 31874616
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Improving protein-protein interaction prediction using evolutionary information from low-quality MSAs.
VĂ¡rnai C; Burkoff NS; Wild DL
PLoS One; 2017; 12(2):e0169356. PubMed ID: 28166227
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. The choice of sequence homologs included in multiple sequence alignments has a dramatic impact on evolutionary conservation analysis.
Gil N; Fiser A
Bioinformatics; 2019 Jan; 35(1):12-19. PubMed ID: 29947739
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]