These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
23. Behavioral treatment of myopia: refractive error and acuity changes in relation to axial length and intraocular pressure. Rosen RC; Schiffman HR; Meyers H Am J Optom Physiol Opt; 1984 Feb; 61(2):100-5. PubMed ID: 6703003 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Treating myopia with acoustic biofeedback: a prospective study on the evolution of visual acuity and psychological distress. Rupolo G; Angi M; Sabbadin E; Caucci S; Pilotto E; Racano E; de Bertolini C Psychosom Med; 1997; 59(3):313-7. PubMed ID: 9178342 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Management of the low myopia pediatric patient. Birnbaum MH J Am Optom Assoc; 1979 Nov; 50(11):1281-9. PubMed ID: 391851 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Baseline refractive and ocular component measures of children enrolled in the correction of myopia evaluation trial (COMET). Gwiazda J; Marsh-Tootle WL; Hyman L; Hussein M; Norton TT; Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2002 Feb; 43(2):314-21. PubMed ID: 11818372 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Pseudophakic accommodation with translation lenses--dual optic vs mono optic. Langenbucher A; Reese S; Jakob C; Seitz B Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2004 Sep; 24(5):450-7. PubMed ID: 15315660 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Comparison of accommodative adaptation using laser and infra-red optometers. Rosenfield M Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 1989 Oct; 9(4):431-6. PubMed ID: 2631012 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Changes in myopia, visual acuity, and psychological distress after biofeedback visual training. Angi MR; Caucci S; Pilotto E; Racano E; Rupolo G; Sabbadin E Optom Vis Sci; 1996 Jan; 73(1):35-42. PubMed ID: 8867680 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Stimulus requirements for the decoding of myopic and hyperopic defocus under single and competing defocus conditions in the chicken. Diether S; Wildsoet CF Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2005 Jul; 46(7):2242-52. PubMed ID: 15980207 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Accommodative lag under habitual seeing conditions: comparison between myopic and emmetropic children. Nakatsuka C; Hasebe S; Nonaka F; Ohtsuki H Jpn J Ophthalmol; 2005; 49(3):189-94. PubMed ID: 15944822 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Systematic measurement errors involved in over-refraction using an autorefractor (Grand-Seiko WV-500): is measurement of accommodative lag through spectacle lenses valid? Kimura S; Hasebe S; Ohtsuki H Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2007 May; 27(3):281-6. PubMed ID: 17470241 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. The power of visual training. Birnbaum MH J Am Optom Assoc; 1984 Apr; 55(4):257-60. PubMed ID: 6725825 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. A longitudinal study on the relationship between myopia development and near accommodation lag in myopic children. Weizhong L; Zhikuan Y; Wen L; Xiang C; Jian G Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2008 Jan; 28(1):57-61. PubMed ID: 18201336 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Effect of near-vision addition lenses on the accuracy of the accommodative response. Rosenfield M; Carrel MF Optometry; 2001 Jan; 72(1):19-24. PubMed ID: 11217002 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. [Impact of short-term stopped-down spectacle wear on accommodation function]. Voronin GV; Ovechkin IG; Ovechkin NI Vestn Oftalmol; 2008; 124(2):46-7. PubMed ID: 18488474 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Refractive group differences in accommodation microfluctuations with changing accommodation stimulus. Day M; Strang NC; Seidel D; Gray LS; Mallen EA Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2006 Jan; 26(1):88-96. PubMed ID: 16390487 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]