847 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17712019)
1. Should meta-analyses of interventions include observational studies in addition to randomized controlled trials? A critical examination of underlying principles.
Shrier I; Boivin JF; Steele RJ; Platt RW; Furlan A; Kakuma R; Brophy J; Rossignol M
Am J Epidemiol; 2007 Nov; 166(10):1203-9. PubMed ID: 17712019
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Evidence-based medicine, systematic reviews, and guidelines in interventional pain management: part 6. Systematic reviews and meta-analyses of observational studies.
Manchikanti L; Datta S; Smith HS; Hirsch JA
Pain Physician; 2009; 12(5):819-50. PubMed ID: 19787009
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Investigating patient exclusion bias in meta-analysis.
Tierney JF; Stewart LA
Int J Epidemiol; 2005 Feb; 34(1):79-87. PubMed ID: 15561753
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. On the causal structure of information bias and confounding bias in randomized trials.
Shahar E; Shahar DJ
J Eval Clin Pract; 2009 Dec; 15(6):1214-6. PubMed ID: 20367730
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Re: Should meta-analyses of interventions include observational studies in addition to randomized controlled trials? A critical examination of underlying principles.
Pereira C; Castilho E
Am J Epidemiol; 2009 Mar; 169(6):783; author reply 783-4. PubMed ID: 19208724
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Selective reporting of adjusted estimates in observational epidemiology studies: reasons and implications for meta-analyses.
Peters J; Mengersen K
Eval Health Prof; 2008 Dec; 31(4):370-89. PubMed ID: 19000980
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Robustness assessments are needed to reduce bias in meta-analyses that include zero-event randomized trials.
Keus F; Wetterslev J; Gluud C; Gooszen HG; van Laarhoven CJ
Am J Gastroenterol; 2009 Mar; 104(3):546-51. PubMed ID: 19262513
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Practical application of nonrandomized research to patient care: a case study of nesiritide.
Winegardner ML; Reaume KT; Dabaja GS; Kalus JS
Pharmacotherapy; 2007 Jan; 27(1):143-51. PubMed ID: 17192168
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Diet and cancer: the disconnect between epidemiology and randomized clinical trials.
Meyskens FL; Szabo E
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2005 Jun; 14(6):1366-9. PubMed ID: 15941942
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Deriving treatment recommendations from evidence within randomized trials. The role and limitation of meta-analysis.
Freemantle N; Mason J; Eccles M
Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 1999; 15(2):304-15. PubMed ID: 10507190
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Adjustment of meta-analyses on the basis of quality scores should be abandoned.
Herbison P; Hay-Smith J; Gillespie WJ
J Clin Epidemiol; 2006 Dec; 59(12):1249-56. PubMed ID: 17098567
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Meta-analysis in medical research: potentials and limitations.
Zwahlen M; Renehan A; Egger M
Urol Oncol; 2008; 26(3):320-9. PubMed ID: 18452828
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Observational studies: a review of study designs, challenges and strategies to reduce confounding.
Lu CY
Int J Clin Pract; 2009 May; 63(5):691-7. PubMed ID: 19392919
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Impact of allocation concealment on conclusions drawn from meta-analyses of randomized trials.
Pildal J; Hróbjartsson A; Jørgensen KJ; Hilden J; Altman DG; Gøtzsche PC
Int J Epidemiol; 2007 Aug; 36(4):847-57. PubMed ID: 17517809
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Deconstructing evidence in orthodontics: making sense of systematic reviews, randomized clinical trials, and meta-analyses.
Rinchuse DJ; Rinchuse DJ; Kandasamy S; Ackerman MB
World J Orthod; 2008; 9(2):167-76. PubMed ID: 18575311
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Observational studies: going beyond the boundaries of randomized controlled trials.
Yang W; Zilov A; Soewondo P; Bech OM; Sekkal F; Home PD
Diabetes Res Clin Pract; 2010 May; 88 Suppl 1():S3-9. PubMed ID: 20466165
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Methods to adjust for bias and confounding in critical care health services research involving observational data.
Wunsch H; Linde-Zwirble WT; Angus DC
J Crit Care; 2006 Mar; 21(1):1-7. PubMed ID: 16616616
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Trial sequential analyses of meta-analyses of complications in laparoscopic vs. small-incision cholecystectomy: more randomized patients are needed.
Keus F; Wetterslev J; Gluud C; Gooszen HG; van Laarhoven CJ
J Clin Epidemiol; 2010 Mar; 63(3):246-56. PubMed ID: 20004553
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Evidence from crossover trials: empirical evaluation and comparison against parallel arm trials.
Lathyris DN; Trikalinos TA; Ioannidis JP
Int J Epidemiol; 2007 Apr; 36(2):422-30. PubMed ID: 17301102
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Systematic reviews of workplace injury interventions: what are we missing?
Lipscomb HJ; Pompeii LA; Myers DJ; Schoenfisch AL; Dement JM
Med Lav; 2009; 100(4):247-57. PubMed ID: 19764180
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
