These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
196 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17712084)
1. Alternatives to project-specific consent for access to personal information for health research: what is the opinion of the Canadian public? Willison DJ; Schwartz L; Abelson J; Charles C; Swinton M; Northrup D; Thabane L J Am Med Inform Assoc; 2007; 14(6):706-12. PubMed ID: 17712084 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Consent for use of personal information for health research: do people with potentially stigmatizing health conditions and the general public differ in their opinions? Willison DJ; Steeves V; Charles C; Schwartz L; Ranford J; Agarwal G; Cheng J; Thabane L BMC Med Ethics; 2009 Jul; 10():10. PubMed ID: 19630941 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Alternatives to project-specific consent for access to personal information for health research: insights from a public dialogue. Willison DJ; Swinton M; Schwartz L; Abelson J; Charles C; Northrup D; Cheng J; Thabane L BMC Med Ethics; 2008 Nov; 9():18. PubMed ID: 19019239 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Perspectives of Australian adults about protecting the privacy of their health information in statistical databases. King T; Brankovic L; Gillard P Int J Med Inform; 2012 Apr; 81(4):279-89. PubMed ID: 22306206 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Access to medical records for research purposes: varying perceptions across research ethics boards. Willison DJ; Emerson C; Szala-Meneok KV; Gibson E; Schwartz L; Weisbaum KM; Fournier F; Brazil K; Coughlin MD J Med Ethics; 2008 Apr; 34(4):308-14. PubMed ID: 18375687 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Patient Perspectives on Sharing Anonymized Personal Health Data Using a Digital System for Dynamic Consent and Research Feedback: A Qualitative Study. Spencer K; Sanders C; Whitley EA; Lund D; Kaye J; Dixon WG J Med Internet Res; 2016 Apr; 18(4):e66. PubMed ID: 27083521 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Public attitudes towards the use of primary care patient record data in medical research without consent: a qualitative study. Robling MR; Hood K; Houston H; Pill R; Fay J; Evans HM J Med Ethics; 2004 Feb; 30(1):104-9. PubMed ID: 14872086 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A survey of patient perspectives on the research use of health information and biospecimens. Page SA; Manhas KP; Muruve DA BMC Med Ethics; 2016 Aug; 17(1):48. PubMed ID: 27527514 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Factors affecting patient and public perceptions of the adoption of electronic health record sharing: A Hong Kong study. Ong R Int J Med Inform; 2023 Oct; 178():105193. PubMed ID: 37672981 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Patient and public attitudes towards informed consent models and levels of awareness of Electronic Health Records in the UK. Riordan F; Papoutsi C; Reed JE; Marston C; Bell D; Majeed A Int J Med Inform; 2015 Apr; 84(4):237-47. PubMed ID: 25649841 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. "Let's get the best quality research we can": public awareness and acceptance of consent to use existing data in health research: a systematic review and qualitative study. Hill EM; Turner EL; Martin RM; Donovan JL BMC Med Res Methodol; 2013 Jun; 13():72. PubMed ID: 23734773 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Public attitudes to the use in research of personal health information from general practitioners' records: a survey of the Irish general public. Buckley BS; Murphy AW; MacFarlane AE J Med Ethics; 2011 Jan; 37(1):50-5. PubMed ID: 21071570 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Does an interactive trust-enhanced electronic consent improve patient experiences when asked to share their health records for research? A randomized trial. Harle CA; Golembiewski EH; Rahmanian KP; Brumback B; Krieger JL; Goodman KW; Mainous AG; Moseley RE J Am Med Inform Assoc; 2019 Jul; 26(7):620-629. PubMed ID: 30938751 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Consent and widespread access to personal health information for the delivery of care: a large scale telephone survey of consumers' attitudes using vignettes in New Zealand. Whiddett D; Hunter I; McDonald B; Norris T; Waldon J BMJ Open; 2016 Aug; 6(8):e011640. PubMed ID: 27554103 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Investigating the Extent to Which Patients Should Control Access to Patient Records for Research: A Deliberative Process Using Citizens' Juries. Tully MP; Bozentko K; Clement S; Hunn A; Hassan L; Norris R; Oswald M; Peek N J Med Internet Res; 2018 Mar; 20(3):e112. PubMed ID: 29592847 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Attitudes of the Japanese public and doctors towards use of archived information and samples without informed consent: preliminary findings based on focus group interviews. Asai A; Ohnishi M; Nishigaki E; Sekimoto M; Fukuhara S; Fukui T BMC Med Ethics; 2002 Jan; 3():E1. PubMed ID: 11825345 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Factors affecting willingness to share electronic health data among California consumers. Kim KK; Sankar P; Wilson MD; Haynes SC BMC Med Ethics; 2017 Apr; 18(1):25. PubMed ID: 28376801 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Pediatric biobanks: approaching informed consent for continuing research after children grow up. Goldenberg AJ; Hull SC; Botkin JR; Wilfond BS J Pediatr; 2009 Oct; 155(4):578-83. PubMed ID: 19595370 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Consent, confidentiality, and the Data Protection Act. Iversen A; Liddell K; Fear N; Hotopf M; Wessely S BMJ; 2006 Jan; 332(7534):165-9. PubMed ID: 16424496 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Young people's views about consenting to data linkage: findings from the PEARL qualitative study. Audrey S; Brown L; Campbell R; Boyd A; Macleod J BMC Med Res Methodol; 2016 Mar; 16():34. PubMed ID: 27001504 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]