BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

145 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17712306)

  • 1. Lag correction model and ghosting analysis for an indirect-conversion flat-panel imager.
    Mail N; O'Brien P; Pang G
    J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2007 Jul; 8(3):137-146. PubMed ID: 17712306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The x-ray time of flight method for investigation of ghosting in amorphous selenium-based flat panel medical x-ray imagers.
    Rau AW; Bakueva L; Rowlands JA
    Med Phys; 2005 Oct; 32(10):3160-77. PubMed ID: 16279070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Lag and ghosting in a clinical flat-panel selenium digital mammography system.
    Bloomquist AK; Yaffe MJ; Mawdsley GE; Hunter DM; Beideck DJ
    Med Phys; 2006 Aug; 33(8):2998-3005. PubMed ID: 16964878
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A forward bias method for lag correction of an a-Si flat panel detector.
    Starman J; Tognina C; Partain L; Fahrig R
    Med Phys; 2012 Jan; 39(1):18-27. PubMed ID: 22225271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A ghost story: spatio-temporal response characteristics of an indirect-detection flat-panel imager.
    Siewerdsen JH; Jaffray DA
    Med Phys; 1999 Aug; 26(8):1624-41. PubMed ID: 10501063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Ghosting caused by bulk charge trapping in direct conversion flat-panel detectors using amorphous selenium.
    Zhao W; DeCrescenzo G; Kasap SO; Rowlands JA
    Med Phys; 2005 Feb; 32(2):488-500. PubMed ID: 15789596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The influence of antiscatter grids on soft-tissue detectability in cone-beam computed tomography with flat-panel detectors.
    Siewerdsen JH; Moseley DJ; Bakhtiar B; Richard S; Jaffray DA
    Med Phys; 2004 Dec; 31(12):3506-20. PubMed ID: 15651634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Segmented crystalline scintillators: an initial investigation of high quantum efficiency detectors for megavoltage x-ray imaging.
    Sawant A; Antonuk LE; El-Mohri Y; Zhao Q; Li Y; Su Z; Wang Y; Yamamoto J; Du H; Cunningham I; Klugerman M; Shah K
    Med Phys; 2005 Oct; 32(10):3067-83. PubMed ID: 16279059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Blurring artifacts in megavoltage radiography with a flat-panel imaging system: comparison of Monte Carlo simulations with measurements.
    Schach von Wittenau AE; Logan CM; Aufderheide MB; Slone DM
    Med Phys; 2002 Nov; 29(11):2559-70. PubMed ID: 12462723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Resolution at oblique incidence angles of a flat panel imager for breast tomosynthesis.
    Mainprize JG; Bloomquist AK; Kempston MP; Yaffe MJ
    Med Phys; 2006 Sep; 33(9):3159-64. PubMed ID: 17022208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Screen optics effects on detective quantum efficiency in digital radiography: zero-frequency effects.
    Lubinsky AR; Zhao W; Ristic G; Rowlands JA
    Med Phys; 2006 May; 33(5):1499-509. PubMed ID: 16752584
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Performance of a high fill factor, indirect detection prototype flat-panel imager for mammography.
    El-Mohri Y; Antonuk LE; Zhao Q; Wang Y; Li Y; Du H; Sawant A
    Med Phys; 2007 Jan; 34(1):315-27. PubMed ID: 17278517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of ring artifact correction methods for flat-detector CT.
    Prell D; Kyriakou Y; Kalender WA
    Phys Med Biol; 2009 Jun; 54(12):3881-95. PubMed ID: 19491452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Investigation into the optimal linear time-invariant lag correction for radar artifact removal.
    Starman J; Star-Lack J; Virshup G; Shapiro E; Fahrig R
    Med Phys; 2011 May; 38(5):2398-411. PubMed ID: 21776774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Dose-response characteristics of an amorphous silicon EPID.
    Winkler P; Hefner A; Georg D
    Med Phys; 2005 Oct; 32(10):3095-105. PubMed ID: 16279061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Lag measurement in an a-Se active matrix flat-panel imager.
    Schroeder C; Stanescu T; Rathee S; Fallone BG
    Med Phys; 2004 May; 31(5):1203-9. PubMed ID: 15191310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Investigation of a direct conversion flat panel imager for portal imaging.
    Pang G; Lee DL; Rowlands JA
    Med Phys; 2001 Oct; 28(10):2121-8. PubMed ID: 11695774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Megavoltage cone beam digital tomosynthesis (MV-CBDT) for image-guided radiotherapy: a clinical investigational system.
    Pang G; Bani-Hashemi A; Au P; O'Brien PF; Rowlands JA; Morton G; Lim T; Cheung P; Loblaw A
    Phys Med Biol; 2008 Feb; 53(4):999-1013. PubMed ID: 18263954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of technical and anatomical noise in digital thorax X-ray images.
    Hoeschen C; Tischenko O; Buhr E; Illers H
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 114(1-3):75-80. PubMed ID: 15933084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Imaging properties of digital magnification radiography.
    Boyce SJ; Samei E
    Med Phys; 2006 Apr; 33(4):984-96. PubMed ID: 16696475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.