These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

76 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17712713)

  • 1. Fixation and attention control in lateralised target detection and free recall with words.
    Voyer D; Boles DB
    Laterality; 2007 Sep; 12(5):428-48. PubMed ID: 17712713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Attention, reliability, and validity of perceptual asymmetries in the fused dichotic words test.
    Voyer D; Ingram JD
    Laterality; 2005 Nov; 10(6):545-61. PubMed ID: 16298885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Dichotic target detection with words: a modified procedure.
    Voyer D; Szeligo F; Russell NL
    J Clin Exp Neuropsychol; 2005 May; 27(4):400-11. PubMed ID: 15962687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. On functional brain asymmetries in perceptual priming.
    Koivisto M
    Brain Cogn; 1995 Oct; 29(1):36-53. PubMed ID: 8845122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The role of frontopolar cortex in subgoal processing during working memory.
    Braver TS; Bongiolatti SR
    Neuroimage; 2002 Mar; 15(3):523-36. PubMed ID: 11848695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Reliability of laterality effects in a dichotic listening task with words and syllables.
    Russell NL; Voyer D
    Brain Cogn; 2004 Apr; 54(3):266-7. PubMed ID: 15050791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. What do lateralized displays tell us about visual word perception? A cautionary indication from the word-letter effect.
    Jordan TR; Patching GR
    Neuropsychologia; 2004; 42(11):1504-14. PubMed ID: 15246288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A test of perceptual enhancement with peripherally presented letter pairs.
    Chastain G
    J Gen Psychol; 1990 Jul; 117(3):295-301. PubMed ID: 2213000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Masked priming is abstract in the left and right visual fields.
    Bowers JS; Turner EL
    Brain Lang; 2005 Dec; 95(3):414-22. PubMed ID: 15869790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Even frequent and expected words are not identified without spatial attention.
    Lien MC; Ruthruff E; Kouchi S; Lachter J
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2010 May; 72(4):973-88. PubMed ID: 20436194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Visuomotor transformations for reaching to memorized targets: a PET study.
    Lacquaniti F; Perani D; Guigon E; Bettinardi V; Carrozzo M; Grassi F; Rossetti Y; Fazio F
    Neuroimage; 1997 Feb; 5(2):129-46. PubMed ID: 9345543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Complex slow potential generators in a simplified attention paradigm.
    Basile LF; Brunetti EP; Pereira JF; Ballester G; Amaro E; Anghinah R; Ribeiro P; Piedade R; Gattaz WF
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2006 Aug; 61(2):149-57. PubMed ID: 16313987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The role of peripheral vision in implicit contextual cuing.
    van Asselen M; Castelo-Branco M
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2009 Jan; 71(1):76-81. PubMed ID: 19304598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Transcranial magnetic stimulation of the human frontal eye field: effects on visual perception and attention.
    Grosbras MH; Paus T
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2002 Oct; 14(7):1109-20. PubMed ID: 12419133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Visual impairment at large eccentricity in participants treated by vigabatrin: visual, attentional or recognition deficit?
    Naili F; Boucart M; Derambure P; Arndt C
    Epilepsy Res; 2009 Dec; 87(2-3):213-22. PubMed ID: 19800764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Guessing strategies, aging, and bias effects in perceptual identification.
    Light LL; Kennison RF
    Conscious Cogn; 1996 Dec; 5(4):463-99. PubMed ID: 9063611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Right hemispheric dominance in gaze-triggered reflexive shift of attention in humans.
    Okada T; Sato W; Toichi M
    Brain Cogn; 2006 Nov; 62(2):128-33. PubMed ID: 16730869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Central fixations are inadequately controlled by instructions alone: implications for studying cerebral asymmetry.
    Jordan TR; Patching GR; Milner AD
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 1998 May; 51(2):371-91. PubMed ID: 9621844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Visual field asymmetries in attention vary with self-reported attention deficits.
    Poynter W; Ingram P; Minor S
    Brain Cogn; 2010 Apr; 72(3):355-61. PubMed ID: 19931966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Reliability of non-verbal laterality effects in the visual modality.
    Voyer D
    Laterality; 2005 Jan; 10(1):37-50. PubMed ID: 15841822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.