211 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17713260)
1. [3D finite element analysis of bone stress around distally osseointegrated implant for artificial limb attachment].
Zheng L; Luo J; Wang X; Chen J; Gu Z; Zhang X
Sheng Wu Yi Xue Gong Cheng Xue Za Zhi; 2007 Jun; 24(3):554-7. PubMed ID: 17713260
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Finite element analysis of stress-breaking attachments on maxillary implant-retained overdentures.
Tanino F; Hayakawa I; Hirano S; Minakuchi S
Int J Prosthodont; 2007; 20(2):193-8. PubMed ID: 17455444
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The influence of implant diameter and length on stress distribution of osseointegrated implants related to crestal bone geometry: a three-dimensional finite element analysis.
Baggi L; Cappelloni I; Di Girolamo M; Maceri F; Vairo G
J Prosthet Dent; 2008 Dec; 100(6):422-31. PubMed ID: 19033026
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Biomechanical aspects of marginal bone resorption around osseointegrated implants: considerations based on a three-dimensional finite element analysis.
Kitamura E; Stegaroiu R; Nomura S; Miyakawa O
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2004 Aug; 15(4):401-12. PubMed ID: 15248874
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. 3D finite element analysis of changes in stress levels and distributions for an osseointegrated implant after vertical bone loss.
Yoon KH; Kim SG; Lee JH; Suh SW
Implant Dent; 2011 Oct; 20(5):354-9. PubMed ID: 21811169
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Finite element analysis of bone stress and strain around a distal osseointegrated implant for prosthetic limb attachment.
Xu W; Crocombe AD; Hughes SC
Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2000; 214(6):595-602. PubMed ID: 11201407
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Three-dimensional numerical simulation of dental implants as orthodontic anchorage.
Gallas MM; Abeleira MT; Fernández JR; Burguera M
Eur J Orthod; 2005 Feb; 27(1):12-6. PubMed ID: 15743858
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. FE stress analysis of the interface between the bone and an osseointegrated implant for amputees--implications to refine the rehabilitation program.
Lee WC; Doocey JM; Brånemark R; Adam CJ; Evans JH; Pearcy MJ; Frossard LA
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2008 Dec; 23(10):1243-50. PubMed ID: 18809231
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Peri-implant stress analysis in simulation models with or without trabecular bone structure.
Stegaroiu R; Watanabe N; Tanaka M; Ejiri S; Nomura S; Miyakawa O
Int J Prosthodont; 2006; 19(1):40-2. PubMed ID: 16479759
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Effects of implant surface roughness and stiffness of grafted bone on an immediately loaded maxillary implant: a 3D numerical analysis.
Huang HL; Fuh LJ; Hsu JT; Tu MG; Shen YW; Wu CL
J Oral Rehabil; 2008 Apr; 35(4):283-90. PubMed ID: 18321264
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Influence of marginal bone resorption on stress around an implant--a three-dimensional finite element analysis.
Kitamura E; Stegaroiu R; Nomura S; Miyakawa O
J Oral Rehabil; 2005 Apr; 32(4):279-86. PubMed ID: 15790383
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Biomechanical analysis on platform switching: is there any biomechanical rationale?
Maeda Y; Miura J; Taki I; Sogo M
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2007 Oct; 18(5):581-4. PubMed ID: 17608737
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Strain adaptive bone remodelling: influence of the implantation technique.
Behrens BA; Bouguecha A; Nolte I; Meyer-Lindenberg A; Stukenborg-Colsman C; Pressel T
Stud Health Technol Inform; 2008; 133():33-44. PubMed ID: 18376011
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Researches on biomechanics of micro-implant-bone interface and optimum design of micro implant's neck].
Deng F; Zhang L; Zhang Y; Song JL; Fan Y
Sichuan Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2007 Jul; 38(4):701-4. PubMed ID: 17718446
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Stress analysis of the interface between cervical vertebrae end plates and the Bryan, Prestige LP, and ProDisc-C cervical disc prostheses: an in vivo image-based finite element study.
Lin CY; Kang H; Rouleau JP; Hollister SJ; Marca FL
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Jul; 34(15):1554-60. PubMed ID: 19564765
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Selection of the implant transgingival height for optimal biomechanical properties: a three-dimensional finite element analysis.
Sun Y; Kong L; Hu K; Xie C; Zhou H; Liu Y; Liu B
Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2009 Jul; 47(5):393-8. PubMed ID: 18977057
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effect of dental implant cross-sectional design on cortical bone structure using finite element analysis.
Abu-Hammad O; Khraisat A; Dar-Odeh N; El-Maaytah M
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2007 Dec; 9(4):217-21. PubMed ID: 18031443
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Implant-bone interface stress distribution in immediately loaded implants of different diameters: a three-dimensional finite element analysis.
Ding X; Zhu XH; Liao SH; Zhang XH; Chen H
J Prosthodont; 2009 Jul; 18(5):393-402. PubMed ID: 19374710
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The staggered installation of dental implants and its effect on bone stresses.
Abu-Hammad O; Khraisat A; Dar-Odeh N; Jagger DC; Hammerle CH
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2007 Sep; 9(3):121-7. PubMed ID: 17716255
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The possibilities of uncemented glenoid component--a finite element study.
Gupta S; van der Helm FC; van Keulen F
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2004 Mar; 19(3):292-302. PubMed ID: 15003345
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
