BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

211 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17713260)

  • 21. Numeric simulation of time-dependent remodeling of bone around loaded oral implants.
    Eser A; Tonuk E; Akca K; Cehreli MC
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(4):597-608. PubMed ID: 19885399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The effect of primary stability on load transfer and bone remodelling within the uncemented resurfaced femur.
    Pal B; Gupta S
    Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2011 Jun; 225(6):549-61. PubMed ID: 22034739
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. [Three-dimensional finite element analysis of bone stress distribution around the hip joint prosthesis with stepped stem].
    Tan R; Fan H; Wu F; Chen J; Luo J; Zhang X
    Sheng Wu Yi Xue Gong Cheng Xue Za Zhi; 2011 Aug; 28(4):732-6. PubMed ID: 21936371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Evaluation of the cylinder implant thread height and width: a 3-dimensional finite element analysis.
    Kong L; Hu K; Li D; Song Y; Yang J; Wu Z; Liu B
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2008; 23(1):65-74. PubMed ID: 18416414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Comparison of implant body designs and threaded designs of dental implants: a 3-dimensional finite element analysis.
    Huang HL; Chang CH; Hsu JT; Fallgatter AM; Ko CC
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2007; 22(4):551-62. PubMed ID: 17929515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. A method of quantification of stress shielding in the proximal femur using hierarchical computational modeling.
    Be'ery-Lipperman M; Gefen A
    Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin; 2006 Feb; 9(1):35-44. PubMed ID: 16880155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. A comparative analysis of internal bone remodelling concepts in a novel implant for direct skeletal attachment of limb prosthesis evaluation: A finite element analysis.
    Prochor P; Sajewicz E
    Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2018 Mar; 232(3):289-298. PubMed ID: 29350089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Three-dimensional finite element stress and strain analysis of a transfemoral osseointegration implant.
    Xu W; Xu DH; Crocombe AD
    Proc Inst Mech Eng H; 2006 Aug; 220(6):661-70. PubMed ID: 16961185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Biomechanical interactions in tooth-implant-supported fixed partial dentures with variations in the number of splinted teeth and connector type: a finite element analysis.
    Lin CL; Wang JC; Chang WJ
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2008 Jan; 19(1):107-17. PubMed ID: 17944965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Finite element analysis of four thread-form configurations in a stepped screw implant.
    Geng JP; Ma QS; Xu W; Tan KB; Liu GR
    J Oral Rehabil; 2004 Mar; 31(3):233-9. PubMed ID: 15025655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. On the effects of cyclic transversal forces on osseointegrated dental implants: experimental and finite element shakedown analyses.
    Genna F
    Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin; 2003 Apr; 6(2):141-52. PubMed ID: 12745428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. The use of finite element analysis to model bone-implant contact with basal implants.
    Ihde S; Goldmann T; Himmlova L; Aleksic Z
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2008 Jul; 106(1):39-48. PubMed ID: 18439855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Finite element analysis of a bone-implant system with the proximal femur nail.
    Helwig P; Faust G; Hindenlang U; Kröplin B; Eingartner C
    Technol Health Care; 2006; 14(4-5):411-9. PubMed ID: 17065762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Three-dimensional finite elemental analysis of zygomatic implants in craniofacial structures.
    Ujigawa K; Kato Y; Kizu Y; Tonogi M; Yamane GY
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2007 Jul; 36(7):620-5. PubMed ID: 17517497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Biomechanical response of implant systems placed in the maxillary posterior region under various conditions of angulation, bone density, and loading.
    Lin CL; Wang JC; Ramp LC; Liu PR
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2008; 23(1):57-64. PubMed ID: 18416413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Biomechanical effects of a maxillary implant in the augmented sinus: a three-dimensional finite element analysis.
    Huang HL; Fuh LJ; Ko CC; Hsu JT; Chen CC
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(3):455-62. PubMed ID: 19587867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Influence of osseointegration degree and pattern on resonance frequency in the assessment of dental implant stability using finite element analysis.
    Deng B; Tan KB; Liu GR; Lu Y
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2008; 23(6):1082-8. PubMed ID: 19216277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Bivariate evaluation of cylinder implant diameter and length: a three-dimensional finite element analysis.
    Kong L; Sun Y; Hu K; Li D; Hou R; Yang J; Liu B
    J Prosthodont; 2008 Jun; 17(4):286-93. PubMed ID: 18205741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Stress distribution on external hexagon implant system using 3d finite element analysis.
    Segundo RM; Oshima HM; Silva IN; Júnior LH; Mota EG; Coelho LF
    Acta Odontol Latinoam; 2007; 20(2):79-81. PubMed ID: 18590255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. [Mathematical simulation of stem/cement/bone mechanical interactions for Poldi-Cech, CF-30, MS-30 and PFC femoral components].
    Kovanda M; Havlícek V; Hudec J
    Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech; 2009 Apr; 76(2):110-5. PubMed ID: 19439130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.