197 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17713795)
1. Adjacent vertebral failure after vertebroplasty: a biomechanical study of low-modulus PMMA cement.
Boger A; Heini P; Windolf M; Schneider E
Eur Spine J; 2007 Dec; 16(12):2118-25. PubMed ID: 17713795
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Biomechanical evaluation of calcium phosphate-based nanocomposite versus polymethylmethacrylate cement for percutaneous kyphoplasty.
Lu Q; Liu C; Wang D; Liu H; Yang H; Yang L
Spine J; 2019 Nov; 19(11):1871-1884. PubMed ID: 31202837
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The influence of endplate-to-endplate cement augmentation on vertebral strength and stiffness in vertebroplasty.
Steens J; Verdonschot N; Aalsma AM; Hosman AJ
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Jul; 32(15):E419-22. PubMed ID: 17621198
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The effect of standard and low-modulus cement augmentation on the stiffness, strength, and endplate pressure distribution in vertebroplasty.
Kinzl M; Benneker LM; Boger A; Zysset PK; Pahr DH
Eur Spine J; 2012 May; 21(5):920-9. PubMed ID: 22170449
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Adjacent vertebral failure after vertebroplasty. A biomechanical investigation.
Berlemann U; Ferguson SJ; Nolte LP; Heini PF
J Bone Joint Surg Br; 2002 Jul; 84(5):748-52. PubMed ID: 12188498
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A biomechanical investigation of vertebroplasty in osteoporotic compression fractures and in prophylactic vertebral reinforcement.
Furtado N; Oakland RJ; Wilcox RK; Hall RM
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Aug; 32(17):E480-7. PubMed ID: 17762281
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Biomechanical comparison of vertebral augmentation with silicone and PMMA cement and two filling grades.
Schulte TL; Keiler A; Riechelmann F; Lange T; Schmoelz W
Eur Spine J; 2013 Dec; 22(12):2695-701. PubMed ID: 23880868
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Biomechanical evaluation of an injectable calcium phosphate cement for vertebroplasty.
Lim TH; Brebach GT; Renner SM; Kim WJ; Kim JG; Lee RE; Andersson GB; An HS
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2002 Jun; 27(12):1297-302. PubMed ID: 12065977
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Biomechanics of low-modulus and standard acrylic bone cements in simulated vertebroplasty: A human ex vivo study.
Holub O; López A; Borse V; Engqvist H; Kapur N; Hall RM; Persson C
J Biomech; 2015 Sep; 48(12):3258-66. PubMed ID: 26189096
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Adjacent vertebral body fracture following vertebroplasty with polymethylmethacrylate or calcium phosphate cement: biomechanical evaluation of the cadaveric spine.
Nouda S; Tomita S; Kin A; Kawahara K; Kinoshita M
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Nov; 34(24):2613-8. PubMed ID: 19910764
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Biomechanical study of polymethyl methacrylate bone cement and allogeneic bone for strengthening sheep vertebrae].
Wang Z; Zhang X; Li Z; Feng Q; Chen J; Xie W
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2021 Apr; 35(4):471-476. PubMed ID: 33855832
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Suitability of a calcium phosphate cement in osteoporotic vertebral body fracture augmentation: a controlled, randomized, clinical trial of balloon kyphoplasty comparing calcium phosphate versus polymethylmethacrylate.
Blattert TR; Jestaedt L; Weckbach A
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Jan; 34(2):108-14. PubMed ID: 19139662
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Feasibility study of using viscoplastic bone cement for vertebroplasty: an in vivo clinical trial and in vitro cadaveric biomechanical examination.
Lin SW; Chiang CK; Yang CL; Wang JL
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2010 May; 35(10):E385-91. PubMed ID: 20393389
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Biomechanical evaluation of kyphoplasty with calcium sulfate cement in a cadaveric osteoporotic vertebral compression fracture model.
Perry A; Mahar A; Massie J; Arrieta N; Garfin S; Kim C
Spine J; 2005; 5(5):489-93. PubMed ID: 16153574
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Does the cement stiffness affect fatigue fracture strength of vertebrae after cement augmentation in osteoporotic patients?
Kolb JP; Kueny RA; Püschel K; Boger A; Rueger JM; Morlock MM; Huber G; Lehmann W
Eur Spine J; 2013 Jul; 22(7):1650-6. PubMed ID: 23677522
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Long-term effects of vertebroplasty: adjacent vertebral fractures.
Baroud G; Vant C; Wilcox R
J Long Term Eff Med Implants; 2006; 16(4):265-80. PubMed ID: 17073569
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The effect of pulsed jet lavage in vertebroplasty on injection forces of PMMA bone cement: an animal study.
Boger A; Benneker LM; Krebs J; Boner V; Heini PF; Gisep A
Eur Spine J; 2009 Dec; 18(12):1957-62. PubMed ID: 19568774
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Prophylactic vertebroplasty can decrease the fracture risk of adjacent vertebrae: an in vitro cadaveric study.
Aquarius R; Homminga J; Hosman AJ; Verdonschot N; Tanck E
Med Eng Phys; 2014 Jul; 36(7):944-8. PubMed ID: 24736018
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Specimen-specific nonlinear finite element modeling to predict vertebrae fracture loads after vertebroplasty.
Matsuura Y; Giambini H; Ogawa Y; Fang Z; Thoreson AR; Yaszemski MJ; Lu L; An KN
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2014 Oct; 39(22):E1291-6. PubMed ID: 25077904
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Performance of vertebral cancellous bone augmented with compliant PMMA under dynamic loads.
Boger A; Bohner M; Heini P; Schwieger K; Schneider E
Acta Biomater; 2008 Nov; 4(6):1688-93. PubMed ID: 18678533
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
