These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

111 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17714173)

  • 1. Do published search filters to identify diagnostic test accuracy studies perform adequately?
    Ritchie G; Glanville J; Lefebvre C
    Health Info Libr J; 2007 Sep; 24(3):188-92. PubMed ID: 17714173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Search strategies to identify diagnostic accuracy studies in MEDLINE and EMBASE.
    Beynon R; Leeflang MM; McDonald S; Eisinga A; Mitchell RL; Whiting P; Glanville JM
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2013 Sep; 2013(9):MR000022. PubMed ID: 24022476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Use of methodological search filters to identify diagnostic accuracy studies can lead to the omission of relevant studies.
    Leeflang MM; Scholten RJ; Rutjes AW; Reitsma JB; Bossuyt PM
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2006 Mar; 59(3):234-40. PubMed ID: 16488353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Diagnostic test systematic reviews: bibliographic search filters ("Clinical Queries") for diagnostic accuracy studies perform well.
    Kastner M; Wilczynski NL; McKibbon AK; Garg AX; Haynes RB
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2009 Sep; 62(9):974-81. PubMed ID: 19230607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. How well do search filters perform in identifying economic evaluations in MEDLINE and EMBASE.
    Glanville J; Kaunelis D; Mensinkai S
    Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2009 Oct; 25(4):522-9. PubMed ID: 19845982
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Inclusion of methodological filters in searches for diagnostic test accuracy studies misses relevant studies.
    Whiting P; Westwood M; Beynon R; Burke M; Sterne JA; Glanville J
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2011 Jun; 64(6):602-7. PubMed ID: 21075596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. An alternative to the hand searching gold standard: validating methodological search filters using relative recall.
    Sampson M; Zhang L; Morrison A; Barrowman NJ; Clifford TJ; Platt RW; Klassen TP; Moher D
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2006 Jul; 6():33. PubMed ID: 16848895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Identifying studies for systematic reviews of diagnostic tests was difficult due to the poor sensitivity and precision of methodologic filters and the lack of information in the abstract.
    Doust JA; Pietrzak E; Sanders S; Glasziou PP
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2005 May; 58(5):444-9. PubMed ID: 15845330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Should methodological filters for diagnostic test accuracy studies be used in systematic reviews of psychometric instruments? A case study involving screening for postnatal depression.
    Mann R; Gilbody SM
    Syst Rev; 2012 Feb; 1():9. PubMed ID: 22588034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Performance of search strategies to retrieve systematic reviews of diagnostic test accuracy from the Cochrane Library.
    Huang Y; Yang Z; Wang J; Zhuo L; Li Z; Zhan S
    J Evid Based Med; 2016 May; 9(2):77-83. PubMed ID: 27152676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Identifying diagnostic studies in MEDLINE: reducing the number needed to read.
    Bachmann LM; Coray R; Estermann P; Ter Riet G
    J Am Med Inform Assoc; 2002; 9(6):653-8. PubMed ID: 12386115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Retrieving randomized controlled trials from medline: a comparison of 38 published search filters.
    McKibbon KA; Wilczynski NL; Haynes RB;
    Health Info Libr J; 2009 Sep; 26(3):187-202. PubMed ID: 19712211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Inclusion of methodological filters in searches for diagnostic test accuracy studies misses relevant studies.
    Kastner M; Haynes RB; Wilczynski NL
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2012 Jan; 65(1):116-7; author reply 117-8. PubMed ID: 22118266
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effectiveness of adverse effects search filters: drugs versus medical devices.
    Farrah K; Mierzwinski-Urban M; Cimon K
    J Med Libr Assoc; 2016 Jul; 104(3):221-5. PubMed ID: 27366123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Which are the most sensitive search filters to identify randomized controlled trials in MEDLINE?
    Glanville J; Kotas E; Featherstone R; Dooley G
    J Med Libr Assoc; 2020 Oct; 108(4):556-563. PubMed ID: 33013212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Development of search filters for retrieval of literature on the molecular epidemiology of cancer.
    Ugolini D; Neri M; Casilli C; Bonassi S
    Mutat Res; 2010 Aug; 701(2):107-10. PubMed ID: 20685344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Building a gold standard to construct search filters: a case study with biomarkers for oral cancer.
    Frazier JJ; Stein CD; Tseytlin E; Bekhuis T
    J Med Libr Assoc; 2015 Jan; 103(1):22-30. PubMed ID: 25552941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Systematic reviews of test accuracy should search a range of databases to identify primary studies.
    Whiting P; Westwood M; Burke M; Sterne J; Glanville J
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2008 Apr; 61(4):357-364. PubMed ID: 18313560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Search Strategy to Identify Dental Survival Analysis Articles Indexed in MEDLINE.
    Layton DM; Clarke M
    Int J Prosthodont; 2016; 29(1):20-7. PubMed ID: 26757323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. EMBASE search strategies for identifying methodologically sound diagnostic studies for use by clinicians and researchers.
    Wilczynski NL; Haynes RB;
    BMC Med; 2005 Mar; 3():7. PubMed ID: 15796772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.