BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

255 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17714555)

  • 21. The impact of bowel cleansing on follow-up recommendations in average-risk patients with a normal colonoscopy.
    Menees SB; Elliott E; Govani S; Anastassiades C; Judd S; Urganus A; Boyce S; Schoenfeld P
    Am J Gastroenterol; 2014 Feb; 109(2):148-54. PubMed ID: 24496417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Comparison of two schedules (previous evening versus same morning) of bowel preparation for colonoscopy.
    Gupta T; Mandot A; Desai D; Abraham P; Joshi A; Shah S
    Endoscopy; 2007 Aug; 39(8):706-9. PubMed ID: 17661245
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Comparison of polyethylene glycol versus combination of magnesium sulphate and bisacodyl for colon preparation.
    Jayanthi V; Ramathilakam B; Malathi S; Dinakaran N; Balasubramanian V
    Trop Gastroenterol; 2000; 21(1):18-9. PubMed ID: 10835955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Comparative study on two colonic bowel preparations for patients with chronic constipation.
    Chen H; Li X; Ge Z
    Scand J Gastroenterol; 2009; 44(3):375-9. PubMed ID: 19005996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Taishotoyama Symposium Barriers to colorectal cancer screening: economics, capacity and adherence.
    Inadomi JM
    J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2008 Dec; 23 Suppl 2():S198-204. PubMed ID: 19120898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Key safety issues of bowel preparations for colonoscopy and importance of adequate hydration.
    Dykes C; Cash BD
    Gastroenterol Nurs; 2008; 31(1):30-5; quiz 36-7. PubMed ID: 18300822
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. A randomized clinical study evaluating the safety and efficacy of a new, reduced-volume, oral sulfate colon-cleansing preparation for colonoscopy.
    Di Palma JA; Rodriguez R; McGowan J; Cleveland Mv
    Am J Gastroenterol; 2009 Sep; 104(9):2275-84. PubMed ID: 19584830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. [Effectiveness of screening colonoscopy in a community-based study].
    Hüppe D; Hartmann H; Felten G; Kemen M; Tannapfel A; Gillessen A; Katalinic A
    Z Gastroenterol; 2008 Feb; 46(2):193-200. PubMed ID: 18253898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Duration of the interval between the completion of bowel preparation and the start of colonoscopy predicts bowel-preparation quality.
    Siddiqui AA; Yang K; Spechler SJ; Cryer B; Davila R; Cipher D; Harford WV
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2009 Mar; 69(3 Pt 2):700-6. PubMed ID: 19251013
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Physician recommendations and patient adherence after inadequate bowel preparation on screening colonoscopy.
    Chokshi RV; Hovis CE; Colditz GA; Early DS; Wang JS
    Dig Dis Sci; 2013 Aug; 58(8):2151-5. PubMed ID: 23535876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Adenomas are detected more often in morning than in afternoon colonoscopy.
    Sanaka MR; Deepinder F; Thota PN; Lopez R; Burke CA
    Am J Gastroenterol; 2009 Jul; 104(7):1659-64; quiz 1665. PubMed ID: 19491841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Colon cleansing with oral sodium phosphate in adolescents: dose, efficacy, acceptability, and safety.
    Sabri M; Di Lorenzo C; Henderson W; Thompson W; Barksdale E; Khan S
    Am J Gastroenterol; 2008 Jun; 103(6):1533-9; quiz 1540. PubMed ID: 18510625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Variable detection of nonadenomatous polyps by individual endoscopists at colonoscopy and correlation with adenoma detection.
    Chen SC; Rex DK
    J Clin Gastroenterol; 2008 Jul; 42(6):704-7. PubMed ID: 18496392
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. A nationwide survey evaluating adherence to guidelines for follow-up after polypectomy or treatment for colorectal cancer.
    Mulder SA; Ouwendijk RJ; van Leerdam ME; Nagengast FM; Kuipers EJ
    J Clin Gastroenterol; 2008; 42(5):487-92. PubMed ID: 18344890
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Receipt of guideline-recommended follow-up in older colorectal cancer survivors : a population-based analysis.
    Cooper GS; Kou TD; Reynolds HL
    Cancer; 2008 Oct; 113(8):2029-37. PubMed ID: 18780338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Colonoscopy training for nurse endoscopists: a feasibility study.
    Koornstra JJ; Corporaal S; Giezen-Beintema WM; de Vries SE; van Dullemen HM
    Gastrointest Endosc; 2009 Mar; 69(3 Pt 2):688-95. PubMed ID: 19251011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Findings at follow-up endoscopies in subjects with suspected colorectal abnormalities: effects of baseline findings and time to follow-up.
    Cafferty FH; Wong JM; Yen AM; Duffy SW; Atkin WS; Chen TH
    Cancer J; 2007; 13(4):263-70. PubMed ID: 17762762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. [Interval colon cancer and possible causes].
    Bechtler M; Eickhoff A; Riemann JF
    Dtsch Med Wochenschr; 2008 Nov; 133(47):2458-62. PubMed ID: 19006045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Effectiveness of a continuous quality improvement program on colonoscopy practice.
    Imperiali G; Minoli G; Meucci GM; Spinzi G; Strocchi E; Terruzzi V; Radaelli F
    Endoscopy; 2007 Apr; 39(4):314-8. PubMed ID: 17273959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Editorial: Bowel preparation: is fair good enough?
    Liang PS; Dominitz JA
    Am J Gastroenterol; 2014 Nov; 109(11):1725-7. PubMed ID: 25373582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.