119 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17715116)
1. Effect of slice thickness and primary 2D versus 3D virtual dissection on colorectal lesion detection at CT colonography in 452 asymptomatic adults.
Johnson CD; Fletcher JG; MacCarty RL; Mandrekar JN; Harmsen WS; Limburg PJ; Wilson LA
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2007 Sep; 189(3):672-80. PubMed ID: 17715116
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Computer-aided detection (CAD) using 360 degree virtual dissection: can CAD in a first reviewer paradigm be a reliable substitute for primary 2D or 3D search?
Johnson KT; Fletcher JG; Johnson CD
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2007 Oct; 189(4):W172-6. PubMed ID: 17885028
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Primary three-dimensional analysis with perspective-filet view versus primary two-dimensional analysis: evaluation of lesion detection by inexperienced readers at computed tomographic colonography in symptomatic patients.
Fisichella VA; Jäderling F; Horvath S; Stotzer PO; Kilander A; Hellström M
Acta Radiol; 2009 Apr; 50(3):244-55. PubMed ID: 19235581
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Primary 2D versus primary 3D polyp detection at screening CT colonography.
Pickhardt PJ; Lee AD; Taylor AJ; Michel SJ; Winter TC; Shadid A; Meiners RJ; Chase PJ; Hinshaw JL; Williams JG; Prout TM; Husain SH; Kim DH
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2007 Dec; 189(6):1451-6. PubMed ID: 18029884
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [CT-colonography with the 16-slice CT for the diagnostic evaluation of colorectal neoplasms and inflammatory colon diseases].
Röttgen R; Schröder RJ; Lorenz M; Herbel A; Fischbach F; Herzog H; Lopez-Häninnen E; Gutberlet M; Hoffmann K; Helmig K; Felix R
Rofo; 2003 Oct; 175(10):1384-91. PubMed ID: 14556108
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Fecal-tagging CT colonography with structure-analysis electronic cleansing for detection of colorectal flat lesions.
Xu Y; Cai W; Nappi J; Yoshida H
Eur J Radiol; 2012 Aug; 81(8):1712-6. PubMed ID: 21596500
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Noncathartic CT colonography with stool tagging: performance with and without electronic stool subtraction.
Johnson CD; Manduca A; Fletcher JG; MacCarty RL; Carston MJ; Harmsen WS; Mandrekar JN
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2008 Feb; 190(2):361-6. PubMed ID: 18212221
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Will 3D virtual dissection display prove to be the display format for reviewing CT colonography examinations?
Glick S
Radiology; 2007 Sep; 244(3):629-30. PubMed ID: 17709819
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Computer-aided detection (CAD) as a second reader using perspective filet view at CT colonography: effect on performance of inexperienced readers.
Fisichella VA; Jäderling F; Horvath S; Stotzer PO; Kilander A; Båth M; Hellström M
Clin Radiol; 2009 Oct; 64(10):972-82. PubMed ID: 19748002
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. ACRIN CT colonography trial: does reader's preference for primary two-dimensional versus primary three-dimensional interpretation affect performance?
Hara AK; Blevins M; Chen MH; Dachman AH; Kuo MD; Menias CO; Siewert B; Cheema JI; Obregon RG; Fidler JL; Zimmerman P; Horton KM; Coakley KJ; Iyer RB; Halvorsen RA; Casola G; Yee J; Herman BA; Johnson CD
Radiology; 2011 May; 259(2):435-41. PubMed ID: 21364081
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Sensitivity of CT colonography for nonpolypoid colorectal lesions interpreted by human readers and with computer-aided detection.
Park SH; Kim SY; Lee SS; Bogoni L; Kim AY; Yang SK; Myung SJ; Byeon JS; Ye BD; Ha HK
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2009 Jul; 193(1):70-8. PubMed ID: 19542397
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Polyp measurement with CT colonography: multiple-reader, multiple-workstation comparison.
Young BM; Fletcher JG; Paulsen SR; Booya F; Johnson CD; Johnson KT; Melton Z; Rodysill D; Mandrekar J
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2007 Jan; 188(1):122-9. PubMed ID: 17179354
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Performance of a previously validated CT colonography computer-aided detection system in a new patient population.
Summers RM; Handwerker LR; Pickhardt PJ; Van Uitert RL; Deshpande KK; Yeshwant S; Yao J; Franaszek M
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2008 Jul; 191(1):168-74. PubMed ID: 18562741
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparison of axial, coronal, and primary 3D review in MDCT colonography for the detection of small polyps: a phantom study.
Mang T; Schaefer-Prokop C; Schima W; Maier A; Schober E; Mueller-Mang C; Weber M; Prokop M
Eur J Radiol; 2009 Apr; 70(1):86-93. PubMed ID: 18221849
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Virtual colon dissection with CT colonography compared with axial interpretation and conventional colonoscopy: preliminary results.
Hoppe H; Quattropani C; Spreng A; Mattich J; Netzer P; Dinkel HP
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2004 May; 182(5):1151-8. PubMed ID: 15100110
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Assessment of two 3D MDCT colonography protocols for observation of colorectal polyps.
Yasumoto T; Murakami T; Yamamoto H; Hori M; Iannaccone R; Kim T; Abe H; Kuwabara M; Yamasaki K; Kikkawa N; Arimoto H; Passariello R; Nakamura H
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2006 Jan; 186(1):85-9. PubMed ID: 16357383
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. CT colonoscopy of colorectal neoplasms: two-dimensional and three-dimensional virtual-reality techniques with colonoscopic correlation.
Royster AP; Fenlon HM; Clarke PD; Nunes DP; Ferrucci JT
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1997 Nov; 169(5):1237-42. PubMed ID: 9353434
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of a unidirectional panoramic 3D endoluminal interpretation technique to traditional 2D and bidirectional 3D interpretation techniques at CT colonography: preliminary observations.
Lenhart DK; Babb J; Bonavita J; Kim D; Bini EJ; Megibow AJ; Macari M
Clin Radiol; 2010 Feb; 65(2):118-25. PubMed ID: 20103433
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Anatomic factors predictive of incomplete colonoscopy based on findings at CT colonography.
Hanson ME; Pickhardt PJ; Kim DH; Pfau PR
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2007 Oct; 189(4):774-9. PubMed ID: 17885044
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [CT colonography as routine method].
Böhm G; Mang T; Gschwendtner M
Radiologe; 2012 Jun; 52(6):511-8. PubMed ID: 22622413
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
