These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

156 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17715492)

  • 1. Exploring the information in p-values for the analysis and planning of multiple-test experiments.
    Ruppert D; Nettleton D; Hwang JT
    Biometrics; 2007 Jun; 63(2):483-95. PubMed ID: 17715492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A moment-based method for estimating the proportion of true null hypotheses and its application to microarray gene expression data.
    Lai Y
    Biostatistics; 2007 Oct; 8(4):744-55. PubMed ID: 17244594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Improved estimation of the noncentrality parameter distribution from a large number of t-statistics, with applications to false discovery rate estimation in microarray data analysis.
    Qu L; Nettleton D; Dekkers JC
    Biometrics; 2012 Dec; 68(4):1178-87. PubMed ID: 22551000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Parametric and nonparametric FDR estimation revisited.
    Wu B; Guan Z; Zhao H
    Biometrics; 2006 Sep; 62(3):735-44. PubMed ID: 16984315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Multiple testing with discrete data: Proportion of true null hypotheses and two adaptive FDR procedures.
    Chen X; Doerge RW; Heyse JF
    Biom J; 2018 Jul; 60(4):761-779. PubMed ID: 29748972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Shrinkage estimation of effect sizes as an alternative to hypothesis testing followed by estimation in high-dimensional biology: applications to differential gene expression.
    Montazeri Z; Yanofsky CM; Bickel DR
    Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol; 2010; 9():Article23. PubMed ID: 20597849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Empirical Bayes estimation of posterior probabilities of enrichment: a comparative study of five estimators of the local false discovery rate.
    Yang Z; Li Z; Bickel DR
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2013 Mar; 14():87. PubMed ID: 23497228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Estimation of false discovery rate using sequential permutation p-values.
    Bancroft T; Du C; Nettleton D
    Biometrics; 2013 Mar; 69(1):1-7. PubMed ID: 23379645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Multiple-testing strategy for analyzing cDNA array data on gene expression.
    Delongchamp RR; Bowyer JF; Chen JJ; Kodell RL
    Biometrics; 2004 Sep; 60(3):774-82. PubMed ID: 15339301
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Empirical Bayes screening of many p-values with applications to microarray studies.
    Datta S; Datta S
    Bioinformatics; 2005 May; 21(9):1987-94. PubMed ID: 15691856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Estimators of the local false discovery rate designed for small numbers of tests.
    Padilla M; Bickel DR
    Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol; 2012 Oct; 11(5):4. PubMed ID: 23079518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Re-sampling strategy to improve the estimation of number of null hypotheses in FDR control under strong correlation structures.
    Lu X; Perkins DL
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2007 May; 8():157. PubMed ID: 17509157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Isotonized CDF estimation from judgment poststratification data with empty strata.
    Wang X; Wang K; Lim J
    Biometrics; 2012 Mar; 68(1):194-202. PubMed ID: 21838805
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Bias and variance reduction in estimating the proportion of true-null hypotheses.
    Cheng Y; Gao D; Tong T
    Biostatistics; 2015 Jan; 16(1):189-204. PubMed ID: 24963010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Estimating the null distribution to adjust observed confidence levels for genome-scale screening.
    Bickel DR
    Biometrics; 2011 Jun; 67(2):363-70. PubMed ID: 20880014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Estimating the false discovery rate using nonparametric deconvolution.
    van de Wiel MA; Kim KI
    Biometrics; 2007 Sep; 63(3):806-15. PubMed ID: 17825012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Unscaled Bayes factors for multiple hypothesis testing in microarray experiments.
    Bertolino F; Cabras S; Castellanos ME; Racugno W
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2015 Dec; 24(6):1030-43. PubMed ID: 22337766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Symmetry in square contingency tables: tests of hypotheses and confidence interval construction.
    May WL; Johnson WD
    J Biopharm Stat; 2001; 11(1-2):23-33. PubMed ID: 11459440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Shrunken p-values for assessing differential expression with applications to genomic data analysis.
    Ghosh D
    Biometrics; 2006 Dec; 62(4):1099-106. PubMed ID: 17156284
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A decision-theory approach to interpretable set analysis for high-dimensional data.
    Boca SM; Bravo HC; Caffo B; Leek JT; Parmigiani G
    Biometrics; 2013 Sep; 69(3):614-23. PubMed ID: 23909925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.