These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

389 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17716261)

  • 1. A literature review on biomaterials in sinus augmentation procedures.
    Browaeys H; Bouvry P; De Bruyn H
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2007 Sep; 9(3):166-77. PubMed ID: 17716261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A clinical and histologic evaluation of implant integration in the posterior maxilla after sinus floor augmentation with autogenous bone, bovine hydroxyapatite, or a 20:80 mixture.
    Hallman M; Sennerby L; Lundgren S
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2002; 17(5):635-43. PubMed ID: 12381063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Porous hydroxyapatite for grafting the maxillary sinus: a comparative histomorphometric study in sheep.
    Haas R; Baron M; Donath K; Zechner W; Watzek G
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2002; 17(3):337-46. PubMed ID: 12074448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Clinical and histologic comparison of two different composite grafts for sinus augmentation: a pilot clinical trial.
    Galindo-Moreno P; Avila G; Fernández-Barbero JE; Mesa F; O'Valle-Ravassa F; Wang HL
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2008 Aug; 19(8):755-9. PubMed ID: 18573123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Maxillary sinus grafting with Bio-Oss or Straumann Bone Ceramic: histomorphometric results from a randomized controlled multicenter clinical trial.
    Cordaro L; Bosshardt DD; Palattella P; Rao W; Serino G; Chiapasco M
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2008 Aug; 19(8):796-803. PubMed ID: 18705811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Histologic and clinical evaluation for maxillary sinus augmentation using macroporous biphasic calcium phosphate in human.
    Lee JH; Jung UW; Kim CS; Choi SH; Cho KS
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2008 Aug; 19(8):767-71. PubMed ID: 18705808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of two different forms of bovine-derived hydroxyapatite in sinus augmentation and simultaneous implant placement: an experimental study.
    Benlidayi ME; Kürkcü M; Oz IA; Sertdemir Y
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(4):704-11. PubMed ID: 19885412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Porous titanium granules used as osteoconductive material for sinus floor augmentation: a clinical pilot study.
    Bystedt H; Rasmusson L
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2009 Jun; 11(2):101-5. PubMed ID: 18657154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Massive sinus-lift procedures with beta-tricalcium phosphate: long-term results].
    Meyer C; Chatelain B; Benarroch M; Garnier JF; Ricbourg B; Camponovo T
    Rev Stomatol Chir Maxillofac; 2009 Apr; 110(2):69-75. PubMed ID: 19171358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effect of platelet-rich plasma on sinus lifting: a randomized-controlled clinical trial.
    Torres J; Tamimi F; Martinez PP; Alkhraisat MH; Linares R; Hernández G; Torres-Macho J; López-Cabarcos E
    J Clin Periodontol; 2009 Aug; 36(8):677-87. PubMed ID: 19563329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Maxillary sinus augmentation with different biomaterials: a comparative histologic and histomorphometric study in man.
    Scarano A; Degidi M; Iezzi G; Pecora G; Piattelli M; Orsini G; Caputi S; Perrotti V; Mangano C; Piattelli A
    Implant Dent; 2006 Jun; 15(2):197-207. PubMed ID: 16766904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Sinus floor augmentation with recombinant human growth and differentiation factor-5 (rhGDF-5): a pilot study in the Goettingen miniature pig comparing autogenous bone and rhGDF-5.
    Gruber RM; Ludwig A; Merten HA; Pippig S; Kramer FJ; Schliephake H
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2009 Feb; 20(2):175-82. PubMed ID: 19077151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Histomorphometric analysis of natural bone mineral for maxillary sinus augmentation.
    John HD; Wenz B
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2004; 19(2):199-207. PubMed ID: 15101590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Assessment of the value of anorganic bone additives in sinus floor augmentation: a review of clinical reports.
    Merkx MA; Maltha JC; Stoelinga PJ
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2003 Feb; 32(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 12653225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Ridge augmentation and maxillary sinus grafting with a biphasic calcium phosphate: histologic and histomorphometric observations.
    Friedmann A; Dard M; Kleber BM; Bernimoulin JP; Bosshardt DD
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2009 Jul; 20(7):708-14. PubMed ID: 19453566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Subantroscopic laterobasal sinus floor augmentation (SALSA): an up-to-5-year clinical study.
    Engelke W; Schwarzwäller W; Behnsen A; Jacobs HG
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2003; 18(1):135-43. PubMed ID: 12608679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A review of survival rates for implants placed in grafted maxillary sinuses using meta-analysis.
    Tong DC; Rioux K; Drangsholt M; Beirne OR
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 1998; 13(2):175-82. PubMed ID: 9581402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Nonceramic hydroxyapatite bone derivative in sinus augmentation procedures: clinical and histomorphometric observations in 10 consecutive cases.
    Artzi Z; Nemcovsky CE; Dayan D
    Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2003 Aug; 23(4):381-9. PubMed ID: 12956482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Maxillary sinus augmentation with a porous synthetic hydroxyapatite and bovine-derived hydroxyapatite: a comparative clinical and histologic study.
    Mangano C; Scarano A; Perrotti V; Iezzi G; Piattelli A
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2007; 22(6):980-6. PubMed ID: 18271380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Histologic findings in sinus augmentation with autogenous bone chips versus a bovine bone substitute.
    Schlegel KA; Fichtner G; Schultze-Mosgau S; Wiltfang J
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2003; 18(1):53-8. PubMed ID: 12608669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 20.