369 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17716317)
1. Accuracy of implant placement based on pre-surgical planning of three-dimensional cone-beam images: a pilot study.
Van Assche N; van Steenberghe D; Guerrero ME; Hirsch E; Schutyser F; Quirynen M; Jacobs R
J Clin Periodontol; 2007 Sep; 34(9):816-21. PubMed ID: 17716317
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Reliability of implant placement with stereolithographic surgical guides generated from computed tomography: clinical data from 94 implants.
Ersoy AE; Turkyilmaz I; Ozan O; McGlumphy EA
J Periodontol; 2008 Aug; 79(8):1339-45. PubMed ID: 18672982
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Accuracy of two stereolithographic guide systems for computer-aided implant placement: a computed tomography-based clinical comparative study.
Arisan V; Karabuda ZC; Ozdemir T
J Periodontol; 2010 Jan; 81(1):43-51. PubMed ID: 20059416
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Accuracy assessment of computer-assisted flapless implant placement in partial edentulism.
Van Assche N; van Steenberghe D; Quirynen M; Jacobs R
J Clin Periodontol; 2010 Apr; 37(4):398-403. PubMed ID: 20447264
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Clinical accuracy of 3 different types of computed tomography-derived stereolithographic surgical guides in implant placement.
Ozan O; Turkyilmaz I; Ersoy AE; McGlumphy EA; Rosenstiel SF
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2009 Feb; 67(2):394-401. PubMed ID: 19138616
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Accuracy of computer-aided oral implant surgery: a clinical and radiographic study.
Valente F; Schiroli G; Sbrenna A
Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(2):234-42. PubMed ID: 19492638
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Accuracy of implant placement in the posterior maxilla as related to 2 types of surgical guides: a pilot study in the human cadaver.
Noharet R; Pettersson A; Bourgeois D
J Prosthet Dent; 2014 Sep; 112(3):526-32. PubMed ID: 24721507
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A randomized clinical trial comparing guided implant surgery (bone- or mucosa-supported) with mental navigation or the use of a pilot-drill template.
Vercruyssen M; Cox C; Coucke W; Naert I; Jacobs R; Quirynen M
J Clin Periodontol; 2014 Jul; 41(7):717-23. PubMed ID: 24460748
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A prospective study on the accuracy of mucosally supported stereolithographic surgical guides in fully edentulous maxillae.
D'haese J; Van De Velde T; Elaut L; De Bruyn H
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2012 Apr; 14(2):293-303. PubMed ID: 19906267
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Reliability of implant placement after virtual planning of implant positions using cone beam CT data and surgical (guide) templates.
Nickenig HJ; Eitner S
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2007; 35(4-5):207-11. PubMed ID: 17576068
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Factors influencing transfer accuracy of cone beam CT-derived template-based implant placement.
Behneke A; Burwinkel M; Behneke N
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2012 Apr; 23(4):416-23. PubMed ID: 22092586
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Accuracy of full guided vs. half-guided implant surgery.
Kühl S; Zürcher S; Mahid T; Müller-Gerbl M; Filippi A; Cattin P
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2013 Jul; 24(7):763-9. PubMed ID: 22551385
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Impact of operator experience on the accuracy of implant placement with stereolithographic surgical templates: an in vitro study.
Cushen SE; Turkyilmaz I
J Prosthet Dent; 2013 Apr; 109(4):248-54. PubMed ID: 23566606
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Clinical application of stereolithographic surgical guides for implant placement: preliminary results.
Di Giacomo GA; Cury PR; de Araujo NS; Sendyk WR; Sendyk CL
J Periodontol; 2005 Apr; 76(4):503-7. PubMed ID: 15857088
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Stereoscopic technique for conversion of radiographic guide into implant surgical guide.
Chan PW; Chik FF; Pow EH; Chow TW
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2013 Aug; 15(4):613-24. PubMed ID: 21985642
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. An alternative method to match planned and achieved positions of implants, after virtual planning using cone-beam CT data and surgical guide templates--a method reducing patient radiation exposure (part I).
Nickenig HJ; Eitner S
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2010 Sep; 38(6):436-40. PubMed ID: 19939692
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Accuracy assessment of cone beam computed tomography-derived laboratory-based surgical templates on partially edentulous patients.
Behneke A; Burwinkel M; Knierim K; Behneke N
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2012 Feb; 23(2):137-143. PubMed ID: 21443593
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Flapless implant surgery in the edentulous jaw based on three fixed intraoral reference points and image-guided surgical templates: accuracy in human cadavers.
Widmann G; Zangerl A; Keiler M; Stoffner R; Bale R; Puelacher W
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2010 Aug; 21(8):835-41. PubMed ID: 20345381
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Accuracy of a computer-aided implant surgical technique.
Cassetta M; Stefanelli LV; Giansanti M; Di Mambro A; Calasso S
Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2013; 33(3):317-25. PubMed ID: 23593625
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Effect of smoking habits on accuracy of implant placement using mucosally supported stereolithographic surgical guides.
D'haese J; De Bruyn H
Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2013 Jun; 15(3):402-11. PubMed ID: 21599833
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
