These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

168 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17716416)

  • 1. Health technology appraisal of interventional procedures: comparison of rapid and slow methods.
    Warren V
    J Health Serv Res Policy; 2007 Jul; 12(3):142-6. PubMed ID: 17716416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. How should cost-effectiveness analysis be used in health technology coverage decisions? Evidence from the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence approach.
    Williams I; Bryan S; McIver S
    J Health Serv Res Policy; 2007 Apr; 12(2):73-9. PubMed ID: 17407655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. After 20 Years of Using Economic Evaluation, Should NICE be Considered a Methods Innovator?
    Sculpher M; Palmer S
    Pharmacoeconomics; 2020 Mar; 38(3):247-257. PubMed ID: 31930460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. On being NICE in the UK: guidelines for technology appraisal for the NHS in England and Wales.
    Birch S; Gafni A
    Health Econ; 2002 Apr; 11(3):185-91. PubMed ID: 11921316
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Seeing the NICE side of cost-effectiveness analysis: a qualitative investigation of the use of CEA in NICE technology appraisals.
    Bryan S; Williams I; McIver S
    Health Econ; 2007 Feb; 16(2):179-93. PubMed ID: 16960851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Patients' views of explicit rationing: what are the implications for health service decision-making?
    Devlin N; Appleby J; Parkin D
    J Health Serv Res Policy; 2003 Jul; 8(3):183-6. PubMed ID: 12869346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Decision making in NICE single technological appraisals: How does NICE incorporate patient perspectives?
    Hashem F; Calnan MW; Brown PR
    Health Expect; 2018 Feb; 21(1):128-137. PubMed ID: 28686809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Challenges for the National Institute for Clinical Excellence.
    Maynard A; Bloor K; Freemantle N
    BMJ; 2004 Jul; 329(7459):227-9. PubMed ID: 15271837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evidence-informed evidence-making.
    Chalkidou K; Walley T; Culyer A; Littlejohns P; Hoy A
    J Health Serv Res Policy; 2008 Jul; 13(3):167-73. PubMed ID: 18573766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Views of Directors of Public Health about NICE Appraisal Guidance: results of a postal survey. National Institute for Clinical Excellence.
    Davies E; Littlejohns P
    J Public Health Med; 2002 Dec; 24(4):319-25. PubMed ID: 12546211
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The cancer technology appraisal programme of the UK's National Institute for Clinical Excellence.
    Littlejohns P; Barnett D; Longson C;
    Lancet Oncol; 2003 Apr; 4(4):242-50. PubMed ID: 12681268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. National Institute for Clinical Excellence (NICE). HTA rhyme and reason?
    Taylor R
    Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2002; 18(2):166-70. PubMed ID: 12053416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Implications of the appraisal function of the National Institute for Clinical Excellence (NICE).
    Buxton M
    Value Health; 2001; 4(3):212-6. PubMed ID: 11705183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. NICE's use of cost effectiveness as an exemplar of a deliberative process.
    Culyer AJ
    Health Econ Policy Law; 2006 Jul; 1(Pt 3):299-318. PubMed ID: 18634698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. National Institute for Clinical Excellence and its value judgments.
    Rawlins MD; Culyer AJ
    BMJ; 2004 Jul; 329(7459):224-7. PubMed ID: 15271836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Getting their say, or getting their way? Has participation strengthened the patient "voice" in the National Institute for Clinical Excellence?
    Quennell P
    J Manag Med; 2001; 15(3):202-19. PubMed ID: 11547580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Quality, innovation, and value for money: NICE and the British National Health Service.
    Pearson SD; Rawlins MD
    JAMA; 2005 Nov; 294(20):2618-22. PubMed ID: 16304076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Data briefing. NICE (National Institute for Clinical Excellence).
    Appleby J
    Health Serv J; 2000 Jun; 110(5708):32. PubMed ID: 11183800
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Estimating 'costs' for cost-effectiveness analysis.
    Miners A
    Pharmacoeconomics; 2008; 26(9):745-51. PubMed ID: 18767895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Searching for a threshold - Not so NICE..
    Mooney G; Coast J; Jan S; ; Ryan M; Wiseman V
    J Health Serv Res Policy; 2007 Jul; 12(3):190; author reply 190-1. PubMed ID: 17716427
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.