161 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17716895)
1. Quantitative assessment of mammographic density and breast cancer risk for Japanese women.
Kotsuma Y; Tamaki Y; Nishimura T; Tsubai M; Ueda S; Shimazu K; Jin Kim S; Miyoshi Y; Tanji Y; Taguchi T; Noguchi S
Breast; 2008 Feb; 17(1):27-35. PubMed ID: 17716895
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Percentage density, Wolfe's and Tabár's mammographic patterns: agreement and association with risk factors for breast cancer.
Gram IT; Bremnes Y; Ursin G; Maskarinec G; Bjurstam N; Lund E
Breast Cancer Res; 2005; 7(5):R854-61. PubMed ID: 16168132
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Endogenous hormone levels, mammographic density, and subsequent risk of breast cancer in postmenopausal women.
Tamimi RM; Byrne C; Colditz GA; Hankinson SE
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2007 Aug; 99(15):1178-87. PubMed ID: 17652278
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Breast cancer screening by mammography in women aged under 50 years in Japan.
Morimoto T; Sasa M; Yamaguchi T; Kondo H; Akaiwa H; Sagara Y
Anticancer Res; 2000; 20(5C):3689-94. PubMed ID: 11268440
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Computerized texture analysis of mammographic parenchymal patterns of digitized mammograms.
Li H; Giger ML; Olopade OI; Margolis A; Lan L; Chinander MR
Acad Radiol; 2005 Jul; 12(7):863-73. PubMed ID: 16039540
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Relationship between mammographic density and the risk of breast cancer in Japanese women: a case-control study.
Nagao Y; Kawaguchi Y; Sugiyama Y; Saji S; Kashiki Y
Breast Cancer; 2003; 10(3):228-33. PubMed ID: 12955035
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Validation of a new fully automated software for 2D digital mammographic breast density evaluation in predicting breast cancer risk.
Giorgi Rossi P; Djuric O; Hélin V; Astley S; Mantellini P; Nitrosi A; Harkness EF; Gauthier E; Puliti D; Balleyguier C; Baron C; Gilbert FJ; Grivegnée A; Pattacini P; Michiels S; Delaloge S
Sci Rep; 2021 Oct; 11(1):19884. PubMed ID: 34615978
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Mammographic features and subsequent risk of breast cancer: a comparison of qualitative and quantitative evaluations in the Guernsey prospective studies.
Torres-Mejía G; De Stavola B; Allen DS; Pérez-Gavilán JJ; Ferreira JM; Fentiman IS; Dos Santos Silva I
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2005 May; 14(5):1052-9. PubMed ID: 15894652
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Wolfe's parenchymal pattern and percentage of the breast with mammographic densities: redundant or complementary classifications?
Brisson J; Diorio C; Mâsse B
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2003 Aug; 12(8):728-32. PubMed ID: 12917203
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Clinical comparison of a novel breast DXA technique to mammographic density.
Shepherd JA; Herve L; Landau J; Fan B; Kerlikowske K; Cummings SR
Med Phys; 2006 May; 33(5):1490-8. PubMed ID: 16752583
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A first evaluation of breast radiological density assessment by QUANTRA software as compared to visual classification.
Ciatto S; Bernardi D; Calabrese M; Durando M; Gentilini MA; Mariscotti G; Monetti F; Moriconi E; Pesce B; Roselli A; Stevanin C; Tapparelli M; Houssami N
Breast; 2012 Aug; 21(4):503-6. PubMed ID: 22285387
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Endogenous sex hormones, prolactin and mammographic density in postmenopausal Norwegian women.
Bremnes Y; Ursin G; Bjurstam N; Rinaldi S; Kaaks R; Gram IT
Int J Cancer; 2007 Dec; 121(11):2506-11. PubMed ID: 17657735
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Insulin-like growth factor and mammographic density in postmenopausal Norwegian women.
Bremnes Y; Ursin G; Bjurstam N; Rinaldi S; Kaaks R; Gram IT
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2007 Jan; 16(1):57-62. PubMed ID: 17220332
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Computerized analysis of mammographic parenchymal patterns for breast cancer risk assessment: feature selection.
Huo Z; Giger ML; Wolverton DE; Zhong W; Cumming S; Olopade OI
Med Phys; 2000 Jan; 27(1):4-12. PubMed ID: 10659732
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Breast parenchymal patterns in women with bilateral primary breast cancer.
Chaudary MA; Gravelle IH; Bulstrode JC; Wang DY; Bulbrook RD; Millis RR; Hayward JL
Br J Radiol; 1983 Oct; 56(670):703-6. PubMed ID: 6616133
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Quantitative classification of mammographic densities and breast cancer risk: results from the Canadian National Breast Screening Study.
Boyd NF; Byng JW; Jong RA; Fishell EK; Little LE; Miller AB; Lockwood GA; Tritchler DL; Yaffe MJ
J Natl Cancer Inst; 1995 May; 87(9):670-5. PubMed ID: 7752271
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Predicting breast cancer risk using mammographic density measurements from both mammogram sides and views.
Stone J; Ding J; Warren RM; Duffy SW
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2010 Nov; 124(2):551-4. PubMed ID: 20544272
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Relation between Mammographic Parenchymal Patterns and Breast Cancer Risk: Considering BMI, Compressed Breast Thickness and Age of Women in Tabriz, Iran.
Mehnati P; Alizadeh H; Hoda H
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2016; 17(4):2259-63. PubMed ID: 27221927
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Mammographic density and breast cancer risk: evaluation of a novel method of measuring breast tissue volumes.
Boyd N; Martin L; Gunasekara A; Melnichouk O; Maudsley G; Peressotti C; Yaffe M; Minkin S
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2009 Jun; 18(6):1754-62. PubMed ID: 19505909
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [A mammographic evaluation of the morphostructural variations of the breast during hormone-replacement therapy in the postmenopause].
Porfiri LM; Costanza L; De Felice C; Perrone G; David V; Zichella L
Radiol Med; 1998 Jun; 95(6):573-6. PubMed ID: 9717537
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
