BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

98 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17717329)

  • 1. Aortic regurgitation: assessment with 64-section CT.
    Alkadhi H; Desbiolles L; Husmann L; Plass A; Leschka S; Scheffel H; Vachenauer R; Schepis T; Gaemperli O; Flohr TG; Genoni M; Marincek B; Jenni R; Kaufmann PA; Frauenfelder T
    Radiology; 2007 Oct; 245(1):111-21. PubMed ID: 17717329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Aortic valves stenosis and regurgitation: assessment with dual source computed tomography.
    Li X; Tang L; Zhou L; Duan Y; Yanhui S; Yang R; Wu Y; Kong X
    Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2009 Aug; 25(6):591-600. PubMed ID: 19350414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Assessment of the regurgitant orifice area in aortic regurgitation with dual-source CT: Comparison with cardiovascular magnetic resonance.
    Ko SM; Park JH; Shin JK; Kim JS
    J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr; 2015; 9(4):345-53. PubMed ID: 26088382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Aortic valve area assessment: multidetector CT compared with cine MR imaging and transthoracic and transesophageal echocardiography.
    Pouleur AC; le Polain de Waroux JB; Pasquet A; Vanoverschelde JL; Gerber BL
    Radiology; 2007 Sep; 244(3):745-54. PubMed ID: 17630357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Aortic stenosis: comparative evaluation of 16-detector row CT and echocardiography.
    Alkadhi H; Wildermuth S; Plass A; Bettex D; Baumert B; Leschka S; Desbiolles LM; Marincek B; Boehm T
    Radiology; 2006 Jul; 240(1):47-55. PubMed ID: 16709791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Planimetric measurement of the regurgitant orifice area using multidetector CT for aortic regurgitation: a comparison with the use of echocardiography.
    Jeon MH; Choe YH; Cho SJ; Park SW; Park PW; Oh JK
    Korean J Radiol; 2010; 11(2):169-77. PubMed ID: 20191064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Quantification of aortic regurgitant fraction and volume with multi-detector computed tomography comparison with echocardiography.
    Feuchtner GM; Spoeck A; Lessick J; Dichtl W; Plass A; Leschka S; Mueller S; Klauser A; Scheffel H; Wolf F; Jaschke W; Alkadhi H
    Acad Radiol; 2011 Mar; 18(3):334-42. PubMed ID: 21295735
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. 64-slice multidetector computed tomography (MDCT) for detection of aortic regurgitation and quantification of severity.
    Jassal DS; Shapiro MD; Neilan TG; Chaithiraphan V; Ferencik M; Teague SD; Brady TJ; Isselbacher EM; Cury RC
    Invest Radiol; 2007 Jul; 42(7):507-12. PubMed ID: 17568273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evaluation of anatomic valve opening and leaflet morphology in aortic valve bioprosthesis by using multidetector CT: comparison with transthoracic echocardiography.
    Chenot F; Montant P; Goffinet C; Pasquet A; Vancraeynest D; Coche E; Vanoverschelde JL; Gerber BL
    Radiology; 2010 May; 255(2):377-85. PubMed ID: 20019133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Detection of aortic regurgitation with 64-slice multidetector computed tomography (MDCT).
    Zeb I; Hamirani YS; Mao S; Isma'eel H; Saeed A; Karnwal S; Raina S; Chung J; Budoff MJ
    Acad Radiol; 2010 Aug; 17(8):1006-11. PubMed ID: 20605488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Isolated mitral regurgitation: quantitative assessment with 64-section multidetector CT--comparison with MR imaging and echocardiography.
    Guo YK; Yang ZG; Ning G; Rao L; Dong L; Pen Y; Zhang TM; Wu Y; Zhang XC; Wang QL
    Radiology; 2009 Aug; 252(2):369-76. PubMed ID: 19451543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Mitral regurgitation: quantification with 16-detector row CT--initial experience.
    Alkadhi H; Wildermuth S; Bettex DA; Plass A; Baumert B; Leschka S; Desbiolles LM; Marincek B; Boehm T
    Radiology; 2006 Feb; 238(2):454-63. PubMed ID: 16371578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Assessment of mitral valve regurgitation at electron-beam CT: comparison with Doppler echocardiography.
    Lembcke A; Borges AC; Dushe S; Dohmen PM; Wiese TH; Rogalla P; Hermann KG; Hamm B; Enzweiler CN
    Radiology; 2005 Jul; 236(1):47-55. PubMed ID: 15987962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Multimodality imaging in transcatheter aortic valve implantation and post-procedural aortic regurgitation: comparison among cardiovascular magnetic resonance, cardiac computed tomography, and echocardiography.
    Jabbour A; Ismail TF; Moat N; Gulati A; Roussin I; Alpendurada F; Park B; Okoroafor F; Asgar A; Barker S; Davies S; Prasad SK; Rubens M; Mohiaddin RH
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 2011 Nov; 58(21):2165-73. PubMed ID: 22078422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Morphological and Functional Evaluation of Quadricuspid Aortic Valves Using Cardiac Computed Tomography.
    Song I; Park JA; Choi BH; Ko SM; Shin JK; Chee HK; Kim JS
    Korean J Radiol; 2016; 17(4):463-71. PubMed ID: 27390538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. 64-MDCT for diagnosis of aortic regurgitation in patients referred to CT coronary angiography.
    Feuchtner GM; Dichtl W; Müller S; Jodocy D; Schachner T; Klauser A; Bonatti JO
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2008 Jul; 191(1):W1-7. PubMed ID: 18562710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Prospective comparison of valve regurgitation quantitation by cardiac magnetic resonance imaging and transthoracic echocardiography.
    Cawley PJ; Hamilton-Craig C; Owens DS; Krieger EV; Strugnell WE; Mitsumori L; D'Jang CL; Schwaegler RG; Nguyen KQ; Nguyen B; Maki JH; Otto CM
    Circ Cardiovasc Imaging; 2013 Jan; 6(1):48-57. PubMed ID: 23212272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparison of 64-slice computed tomography planimetry and Doppler echocardiography in the assessment of aortic valve stenosis.
    Habis M; Daoud B; Roger VL; Ghostine S; Caussin C; Ramadan R; Nottin R; Lancelin B; Angel CY; Capderou A; Paul JF
    J Heart Valve Dis; 2007 May; 16(3):216-24. PubMed ID: 17578038
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Cardiac Magnetic Resonance Imaging Versus Transthoracic Echocardiography for Prediction of Outcomes in Chronic Aortic or Mitral Regurgitation.
    Harris AW; Krieger EV; Kim M; Cawley PJ; Owens DS; Hamilton-Craig C; Maki J; Otto CM
    Am J Cardiol; 2017 Apr; 119(7):1074-1081. PubMed ID: 28153348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of two- and three-dimensional transthoracic echocardiography to cardiac magnetic resonance imaging for assessment of paravalvular regurgitation after transcatheter aortic valve implantation.
    Altiok E; Frick M; Meyer CG; Al Ateah G; Napp A; Kirschfink A; Almalla M; Lotfi S; Becker M; Herich L; Lehmacher W; Hoffmann R
    Am J Cardiol; 2014 Jun; 113(11):1859-66. PubMed ID: 24837265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.