BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

570 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17717331)

  • 1. Assessment of aortoiliac and renal arteries: MR angiography with parallel acquisition versus conventional MR angiography and digital subtraction angiography.
    Sutter R; Nanz D; Lutz AM; Pfammatter T; Seifert B; Struwe A; Heilmaier C; Weishaupt D; Marincek B; Willmann JK
    Radiology; 2007 Oct; 245(1):276-84. PubMed ID: 17717331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Supraaortic arteries: contrast-enhanced MR angiography at 3.0 T--highly accelerated parallel acquisition for improved spatial resolution over an extended field of view.
    Nael K; Villablanca JP; Pope WB; McNamara TO; Laub G; Finn JP
    Radiology; 2007 Feb; 242(2):600-9. PubMed ID: 17255428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. High-spatial-resolution MR angiography of renal arteries with integrated parallel acquisitions: comparison with digital subtraction angiography and US.
    Schoenberg SO; Rieger J; Weber CH; Michaely HJ; Waggershauser T; Ittrich C; Dietrich O; Reiser MF
    Radiology; 2005 May; 235(2):687-98. PubMed ID: 15770035
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Renal artery assessment with nonenhanced steady-state free precession versus contrast-enhanced MR angiography.
    Wyttenbach R; Braghetti A; Wyss M; Alerci M; Briner L; Santini P; Cozzi L; Di Valentino M; Katoh M; Marone C; Vock P; Gallino A
    Radiology; 2007 Oct; 245(1):186-95. PubMed ID: 17717326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evaluation of the aortoiliac and renal arteries: comparison of breath-hold, contrast-enhanced, three-dimensional MR angiography with conventional catheter angiography.
    Hany TF; Debatin JF; Leung DA; Pfammatter T
    Radiology; 1997 Aug; 204(2):357-62. PubMed ID: 9240520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Aortoiliac and lower extremity arteries assessed with 16-detector row CT angiography: prospective comparison with digital subtraction angiography.
    Willmann JK; Baumert B; Schertler T; Wildermuth S; Pfammatter T; Verdun FR; Seifert B; Marincek B; Böhm T
    Radiology; 2005 Sep; 236(3):1083-93. PubMed ID: 16055691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Using gadolinium-enhanced three-dimensional MR angiography to assess arterial inflow stenosis after kidney transplantation.
    Ferreiros J; Mendez R; Jorquera M; Gallego J; Lezana A; Prats D; Pedrosa CS
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1999 Mar; 172(3):751-7. PubMed ID: 10063875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Peripheral arteries in diabetic patients: standard bolus-chase and time-resolved MR angiography.
    Andreisek G; Pfammatter T; Goepfert K; Nanz D; Hervo P; Koppensteiner R; Weishaupt D
    Radiology; 2007 Feb; 242(2):610-20. PubMed ID: 17179394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Diagnostic performance of contrast-enhanced MR angiography of the aortoiliac arteries with the blood pool agent Vasovist: initial results in comparison to intra-arterial DSA].
    Vogt FM; Herborn CU; Parsons EC; Kröger K; Barkhausen J; Goyen M
    Rofo; 2007 Apr; 179(4):412-20. PubMed ID: 17385136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Screening patients for renal artery stenosis: value of three-dimensional time-of-flight MR angiography.
    Loubeyre P; Revel D; Garcia P; Delignette A; Canet E; Chirossel P; Genin G; Amiel M
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1994 Apr; 162(4):847-52. PubMed ID: 8141006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Stenosis detection with MR angiography and digital subtraction angiography in dysfunctional hemodialysis access fistulas and grafts.
    Froger CL; Duijm LE; Liem YS; Tielbeek AV; Donkers-van Rossum AB; Douwes-Draaijer P; Cuypers PW; Buth J; van den Bosch HC
    Radiology; 2005 Jan; 234(1):284-91. PubMed ID: 15618386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. MR angiography of infrapopliteal arteries in patients with peripheral arterial occlusive disease by using Gadofosveset at 3.0 T: diagnostic accuracy compared with selective DSA.
    Bonel HM; Saar B; Hoppe H; Keo HH; Husmann M; Nikolaou K; Ludwig K; Szucs-Farkas Z; Srivastav S; Kickuth R
    Radiology; 2009 Dec; 253(3):879-90. PubMed ID: 19864508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. ECG-gated nonenhanced 3D steady-state free precession MR angiography in assessment of transplant renal arteries: comparison with DSA.
    Lanzman RS; Voiculescu A; Walther C; Ringelstein A; Bi X; Schmitt P; Freitag SM; Won S; Scherer A; Blondin D
    Radiology; 2009 Sep; 252(3):914-21. PubMed ID: 19635833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Aortoiliac and renal arteries: prospective intraindividual comparison of contrast-enhanced three-dimensional MR angiography and multi-detector row CT angiography.
    Willmann JK; Wildermuth S; Pfammatter T; Roos JE; Seifert B; Hilfiker PR; Marincek B; Weishaupt D
    Radiology; 2003 Mar; 226(3):798-811. PubMed ID: 12601190
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Renal arteries: optimization of three-dimensional gadolinium-enhanced MR angiography with bolus-timing-independent fast multiphase acquisition in a single breath hold.
    Schoenberg SO; Bock M; Knopp MV; Essig M; Laub G; Hawighorst H; Zuna I; Kallinowski F; van Kaick G
    Radiology; 1999 Jun; 211(3):667-79. PubMed ID: 10352590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Peripheral arterial occlusive disease: 3.0-T versus 1.5-T MR angiography compared with digital subtraction angiography.
    van den Bosch HC; Westenberg JJ; Caris R; Duijm LE; Tielbeek AV; Cuypers PW; de Roos A
    Radiology; 2013 Jan; 266(1):337-46. PubMed ID: 23143021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Aortoiliac occlusive disease in patients with known or suspected peripheral vascular disease: safety and efficacy of gadofosveset-enhanced MR angiography--multicenter comparative phase III study.
    Rapp JH; Wolff SD; Quinn SF; Soto JA; Meranze SG; Muluk S; Blebea J; Johnson SP; Rofsky NM; Duerinckx A; Foster GS; Kent KC; Moneta G; Middlebrook MR; Narra VR; Toombs BD; Pollak J; Yucel EK; Shamsi K; Weisskoff RM
    Radiology; 2005 Jul; 236(1):71-8. PubMed ID: 15987963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Renal artery stenosis: evaluation with breath-hold, three-dimensional, dynamic, gadolinium-enhanced versus three-dimensional, phase-contrast MR angiography.
    De Cobelli F; Vanzulli A; Sironi S; Mellone R; Angeli E; Venturini M; Garancini MP; Quartagno R; Bianchi G; Del Maschio A
    Radiology; 1997 Dec; 205(3):689-95. PubMed ID: 9393522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Gadofosveset-enhanced MR angiography of carotid arteries: does steady-state imaging improve accuracy of first-pass imaging? Comparison with selective digital subtraction angiography.
    Anzidei M; Napoli A; Marincola BC; Nofroni I; Geiger D; Zaccagna F; Catalano C; Passariello R
    Radiology; 2009 May; 251(2):457-66. PubMed ID: 19401574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of gadofosveset-enhanced three-dimensional magnetic resonance angiography with digital subtraction angiography for lower-extremity peripheral arterial occlusive disease.
    Grijalba FU; Esandi MC
    Acta Radiol; 2010 Apr; 51(3):284-9. PubMed ID: 20105092
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 29.