679 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17717651)
1. Effects of transcranial direct current stimulation on the excitability of the leg motor cortex.
Jeffery DT; Norton JA; Roy FD; Gorassini MA
Exp Brain Res; 2007 Sep; 182(2):281-7. PubMed ID: 17717651
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Effects of transcranial direct current stimulation over the human motor cortex on corticospinal and transcallosal excitability.
Lang N; Nitsche MA; Paulus W; Rothwell JC; Lemon RN
Exp Brain Res; 2004 Jun; 156(4):439-43. PubMed ID: 14745467
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Increasing human leg motor cortex excitability by transcranial high frequency random noise stimulation.
Laczó B; Antal A; Rothkegel H; Paulus W
Restor Neurol Neurosci; 2014; 32(3):403-10. PubMed ID: 24576783
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Slow-oscillatory transcranial direct current stimulation can induce bidirectional shifts in motor cortical excitability in awake humans.
Groppa S; Bergmann TO; Siems C; Mölle M; Marshall L; Siebner HR
Neuroscience; 2010 Apr; 166(4):1219-25. PubMed ID: 20083166
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Acute changes in motor cortical excitability during slow oscillatory and constant anodal transcranial direct current stimulation.
Bergmann TO; Groppa S; Seeger M; Mölle M; Marshall L; Siebner HR
J Neurophysiol; 2009 Oct; 102(4):2303-11. PubMed ID: 19692511
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Transcranial direct current stimulation effects on the excitability of corticospinal axons of the human cerebral cortex.
Di Lazzaro V; Ranieri F; Profice P; Pilato F; Mazzone P; Capone F; Insola A; Oliviero A
Brain Stimul; 2013 Jul; 6(4):641-3. PubMed ID: 23085442
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Systematic assessment of duration and intensity of anodal transcranial direct current stimulation on primary motor cortex excitability.
Tremblay S; Larochelle-Brunet F; Lafleur LP; El Mouderrib S; Lepage JF; Théoret H
Eur J Neurosci; 2016 Sep; 44(5):2184-90. PubMed ID: 27336413
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Muscle-specific variations in use-dependent crossed-facilitation of corticospinal pathways mediated by transcranial direct current (DC) stimulation.
Carson RG; Kennedy NC; Linden MA; Britton L
Neurosci Lett; 2008 Aug; 441(2):153-7. PubMed ID: 18582535
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Transcranial direct-current stimulation reduced the excitability of diaphragmatic corticospinal pathways whatever the polarity used.
Azabou E; Roche N; Sharshar T; Bussel B; Lofaso F; Petitjean M
Respir Physiol Neurobiol; 2013 Oct; 189(1):183-7. PubMed ID: 23933029
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Independent modulation of corticospinal and group I afferents pathways during upright standing.
Baudry S; Duchateau J
Neuroscience; 2014 Sep; 275():162-9. PubMed ID: 24952331
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Neuromuscular electrical stimulation has a global effect on corticospinal excitability for leg muscles and a focused effect for hand muscles.
Exp Brain Res; ; . PubMed ID: 21286692
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
