101 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17718061)
1. [Imaging of cancer activity and range of tumor involvement--applying to breast cancer].
Shibata K; Uno K; Wu J; Ko W
Rinsho Byori; 2007 Jul; 55(7):648-55. PubMed ID: 17718061
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Positron emission tomography with 2-[18F]Fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose and 16alpha-[18F]fluoro-17beta-estradiol in breast cancer: correlation with estrogen receptor status and response to systemic therapy.
Mortimer JE; Dehdashti F; Siegel BA; Katzenellenbogen JA; Fracasso P; Welch MJ
Clin Cancer Res; 1996 Jun; 2(6):933-9. PubMed ID: 9816253
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A preliminary report of breast cancer screening by positron emission mammography.
Yamamoto Y; Tasaki Y; Kuwada Y; Ozawa Y; Inoue T
Ann Nucl Med; 2016 Feb; 30(2):130-7. PubMed ID: 26586370
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. PET in breast cancer.
Flanagan FL; Dehdashti F; Siegel BA
Semin Nucl Med; 1998 Oct; 28(4):290-302. PubMed ID: 9800236
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Position of nuclear medicine modalities in the diagnostic work-up of breast cancer.
Buscombe JR; Holloway B; Roche N; Bombardieri E
Q J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2004 Jun; 48(2):109-18. PubMed ID: 15243412
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. [Usefulness of 18F-FDG PET in the diagnosis for breast cancer patients].
Suzuki T; Uno K; Kubo A
Nihon Rinsho; 2006 Mar; 64(3):504-10. PubMed ID: 16529042
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Positron tomographic assessment of estrogen receptors in breast cancer: comparison with FDG-PET and in vitro receptor assays.
Dehdashti F; Mortimer JE; Siegel BA; Griffeth LK; Bonasera TJ; Fusselman MJ; Detert DD; Cutler PD; Katzenellenbogen JA; Welch MJ
J Nucl Med; 1995 Oct; 36(10):1766-74. PubMed ID: 7562040
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. PET imaging in breast cancer.
Bombardieri E; Crippa F
Q J Nucl Med; 2001 Sep; 45(3):245-56. PubMed ID: 11788817
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. FDG PET/CT for the detection and evaluation of breast diseases: usefulness and limitations.
Lim HS; Yoon W; Chung TW; Kim JK; Park JG; Kang HK; Bom HS; Yoon JH
Radiographics; 2007 Oct; 27 Suppl 1():S197-213. PubMed ID: 18180227
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Role of 2-[18F] fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose-positron emission tomography/computed tomography in the post-therapy surveillance of breast cancer.
Chang HT; Hu C; Chiu YL; Peng NJ; Liu RS
PLoS One; 2014; 9(12):e115127. PubMed ID: 25517451
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. FDG PET, PET/CT, and breast cancer imaging.
Rosen EL; Eubank WB; Mankoff DA
Radiographics; 2007 Oct; 27 Suppl 1():S215-29. PubMed ID: 18180228
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [The role of whole body 2-[fluorine-18]-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography in the management of unknown primary tumors].
Wu ZJ; Zhang YX; Wei H; Jia Q
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2007 Aug; 87(32):2253-6. PubMed ID: 18001544
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of triple-negative and estrogen receptor-positive/progesterone receptor-positive/HER2-negative breast carcinoma using quantitative fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose/positron emission tomography imaging parameters: a potentially useful method for disease characterization.
Basu S; Chen W; Tchou J; Mavi A; Cermik T; Czerniecki B; Schnall M; Alavi A
Cancer; 2008 Mar; 112(5):995-1000. PubMed ID: 18098228
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Recurrent and metastatic breast cancer PET, PET/CT, PET/MRI: FDG and new biomarkers.
Gaeta CM; Vercher-Conejero JL; Sher AC; Kohan A; Rubbert C; Avril N
Q J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2013 Dec; 57(4):352-66. PubMed ID: 24322792
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Assessment of multifocality and axillary nodal involvement in early-stage breast cancer patients using 18F-FDG PET/CT compared to contrast-enhanced and diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging and sentinel node biopsy.
Ergul N; Kadioglu H; Yildiz S; Yucel SB; Gucin Z; Erdogan EB; Aydin M; Muslumanoglu M
Acta Radiol; 2015 Aug; 56(8):917-23. PubMed ID: 25013091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Imaging sensitivity of dedicated positron emission mammography in relation to tumor size.
Eo JS; Chun IK; Paeng JC; Kang KW; Lee SM; Han W; Noh DY; Chung JK; Lee DS
Breast; 2012 Feb; 21(1):66-71. PubMed ID: 21871801
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Circulating tumor cells and [18F]fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography for outcome prediction in metastatic breast cancer.
De Giorgi U; Valero V; Rohren E; Dawood S; Ueno NT; Miller MC; Doyle GV; Jackson S; Andreopoulou E; Handy BC; Reuben JM; Fritsche HA; Macapinlac HA; Hortobagyi GN; Cristofanilli M
J Clin Oncol; 2009 Jul; 27(20):3303-11. PubMed ID: 19451443
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Positron Emission Tomography (PET) and breast cancer in clinical practice.
Lavayssière R; Cabée AE; Filmont JE
Eur J Radiol; 2009 Jan; 69(1):50-8. PubMed ID: 18814983
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Clinical value of 18F-FDG PET-CT in detecting primary tumor for patients with carcinoma of unknown primary.
Han A; Xue J; Hu M; Zheng J; Wang X
Cancer Epidemiol; 2012 Oct; 36(5):470-5. PubMed ID: 22504050
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Early diagnosis of recurrent breast cancer with FDG-PET in patients with progressive elevation of serum tumor markers.
Suárez M; Pérez-Castejón MJ; Jiménez A; Domper M; Ruiz G; Montz R; Carreras JL
Q J Nucl Med; 2002 Jun; 46(2):113-21. PubMed ID: 12114874
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
