These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

193 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17718923)

  • 1. Setting up a large set of protein-ligand PDB complexes for the development and validation of knowledge-based docking algorithms.
    Diago LA; Morell P; Aguilera L; Moreno E
    BMC Bioinformatics; 2007 Aug; 8():310. PubMed ID: 17718923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A general approach for developing system-specific functions to score protein-ligand docked complexes using support vector inductive logic programming.
    Amini A; Shrimpton PJ; Muggleton SH; Sternberg MJ
    Proteins; 2007 Dec; 69(4):823-31. PubMed ID: 17910057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. DOCKGROUND system of databases for protein recognition studies: unbound structures for docking.
    Gao Y; Douguet D; Tovchigrechko A; Vakser IA
    Proteins; 2007 Dec; 69(4):845-51. PubMed ID: 17803215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A new test set for validating predictions of protein-ligand interaction.
    Nissink JW; Murray C; Hartshorn M; Verdonk ML; Cole JC; Taylor R
    Proteins; 2002 Dec; 49(4):457-71. PubMed ID: 12402356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Development and validation of a modular, extensible docking program: DOCK 5.
    Moustakas DT; Lang PT; Pegg S; Pettersen E; Kuntz ID; Brooijmans N; Rizzo RC
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2006; 20(10-11):601-19. PubMed ID: 17149653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Building a structured PDB: the RS-PDB database.
    Szabadka Z; Grolmusz V
    Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2006; 2006():5755-8. PubMed ID: 17945915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. PLIC: protein-ligand interaction clusters.
    Anand P; Nagarajan D; Mukherjee S; Chandra N
    Database (Oxford); 2014; 2014(0):bau029. PubMed ID: 24763918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A fast protein-ligand docking algorithm based on hydrogen bond matching and surface shape complementarity.
    Luo W; Pei J; Zhu Y
    J Mol Model; 2010 May; 16(5):903-13. PubMed ID: 19823881
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. istar: a web platform for large-scale protein-ligand docking.
    Li H; Leung KS; Ballester PJ; Wong MH
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(1):e85678. PubMed ID: 24475049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Recovering the true targets of specific ligands by virtual screening of the protein data bank.
    Paul N; Kellenberger E; Bret G; Müller P; Rognan D
    Proteins; 2004 Mar; 54(4):671-80. PubMed ID: 14997563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The scoring bias in reverse docking and the score normalization strategy to improve success rate of target fishing.
    Luo Q; Zhao L; Hu J; Jin H; Liu Z; Zhang L
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(2):e0171433. PubMed ID: 28196116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Docking and scoring protein complexes: CAPRI 3rd Edition.
    Lensink MF; Méndez R; Wodak SJ
    Proteins; 2007 Dec; 69(4):704-18. PubMed ID: 17918726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Classification of protein complexes based on docking difficulty.
    Vajda S
    Proteins; 2005 Aug; 60(2):176-80. PubMed ID: 15981248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. An extensive and diverse set of molecular overlays for the validation of pharmacophore programs.
    Giangreco I; Cosgrove DA; Packer MJ
    J Chem Inf Model; 2013 Apr; 53(4):852-66. PubMed ID: 23565904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparing protein-ligand docking programs is difficult.
    Cole JC; Murray CW; Nissink JW; Taylor RD; Taylor R
    Proteins; 2005 Aug; 60(3):325-32. PubMed ID: 15937897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Docking of hydrophobic ligands with interaction-based matching algorithms.
    Rarey M; Kramer B; Lengauer T
    Bioinformatics; 1999 Mar; 15(3):243-50. PubMed ID: 10222412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. PSI-DOCK: towards highly efficient and accurate flexible ligand docking.
    Pei J; Wang Q; Liu Z; Li Q; Yang K; Lai L
    Proteins; 2006 Mar; 62(4):934-46. PubMed ID: 16395666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A filter enhanced sampling and combinatorial scoring study for protein docking in CAPRI.
    Gong XQ; Chang S; Zhang QH; Li CH; Shen LZ; Ma XH; Wang MH; Liu B; He HQ; Chen WZ; Wang CX
    Proteins; 2007 Dec; 69(4):859-65. PubMed ID: 17803223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Protein-protein docking in CAPRI using ATTRACT to account for global and local flexibility.
    May A; Zacharias M
    Proteins; 2007 Dec; 69(4):774-80. PubMed ID: 17803217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Assessment of automatic ligand building in ARP/wARP.
    Evrard GX; Langer GG; Perrakis A; Lamzin VS
    Acta Crystallogr D Biol Crystallogr; 2007 Jan; 63(Pt 1):108-17. PubMed ID: 17164533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.