148 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17719031)
1. Measurement of intraocular pressure (IOP) in chickens using a rebound tonometer: quantitative evaluation of variance due to position inaccuracies.
Prashar A; Guggenheim JA; Erichsen JT; Hocking PM; Morgan JE
Exp Eye Res; 2007 Oct; 85(4):563-71. PubMed ID: 17719031
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of invasive and non-invasive tonometry in the mouse.
Morris CA; Crowston JG; Lindsey JD; Danias J; Weinreb RN
Exp Eye Res; 2006 Jun; 82(6):1094-9. PubMed ID: 16466714
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Non-invasive determination of intraocular pressure in the rat eye. Comparison of an electronic tonometer (TonoPen), and a rebound (impact probe) tonometer.
Goldblum D; Kontiola AI; Mittag T; Chen B; Danias J
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2002 Nov; 240(11):942-6. PubMed ID: 12486518
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Clinical comparison of the TonoVet(®) rebound tonometer and the Tono-Pen Vet(®) applanation tonometer in dogs and cats with ocular disease: glaucoma or corneal pathology.
von Spiessen L; Karck J; Rohn K; Meyer-Lindenberg A
Vet Ophthalmol; 2015 Jan; 18(1):20-7. PubMed ID: 24131625
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Assessing intraocular pressure by rebound tonometer in rats with an air-filled anterior chamber.
Lee EJ; Park KH; Kim DM; Yoo YC; Kang SH; Kim YJ
Jpn J Ophthalmol; 2008; 52(6):500-503. PubMed ID: 19089574
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Noninvasive measurement of rodent intraocular pressure with a rebound tonometer.
Wang WH; Millar JC; Pang IH; Wax MB; Clark AF
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2005 Dec; 46(12):4617-21. PubMed ID: 16303957
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Reliability and reproducibility of introcular pressure (IOP) measurement with the Icare
Valero B; Fénolland JR; Rosenberg R; Sendon D; Mesnard C; Sigaux M; Giraud JM; Renard JP
J Fr Ophtalmol; 2017 Dec; 40(10):865-875. PubMed ID: 29174296
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Noninvasive determination of intraocular pressure (IOP) in nonsedated mice of 5 different inbred strains.
Nissirios N; Goldblum D; Rohrer K; Mittag T; Danias J
J Glaucoma; 2007 Jan; 16(1):57-61. PubMed ID: 17224751
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [How does central cornea thickness influence intraocular pressure during applanation and contour tonometry?].
Schwenteck T; Knappe M; Moros I
Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 2012 Sep; 229(9):917-27. PubMed ID: 22972357
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of the rebound tonometer with the Goldmann applanation tonometer in glaucoma patients.
Sahin A; Niyaz L; Yildirim N
Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2007; 35(4):335-9. PubMed ID: 17539785
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Intraocular pressure measurement using rebound tonometer for deviated angles and positions in human eyes.
Takenaka J; Mochizuki H; Kunihara E; Tanaka J; Kiuchi Y
Curr Eye Res; 2012 Feb; 37(2):109-14. PubMed ID: 22029837
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Rebound tonometry in conscious, conditioned mice avoids the acute and profound effects of anesthesia on intraocular pressure.
Johnson TV; Fan S; Toris CB
J Ocul Pharmacol Ther; 2008 Apr; 24(2):175-85. PubMed ID: 18355131
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The induction/impact tonometer: a new instrument to measure intraocular pressure in the rat.
Kontiola AI; Goldblum D; Mittag T; Danias J
Exp Eye Res; 2001 Dec; 73(6):781-5. PubMed ID: 11846509
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Evaluation of a rebound tonometer for measuring intraocular pressure in dogs and horses.
Knollinger AM; La Croix NC; Barrett PM; Miller PE
J Am Vet Med Assoc; 2005 Jul; 227(2):244-8. PubMed ID: 16047660
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Evaluation of intraocular pressure estimates obtained using an iCare rebound tonometer.
Khanal S; Walton M; Davey PG
Clin Exp Optom; 2017 Mar; 100(2):179-183. PubMed ID: 27701775
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of the rebound tonometer (ICare) to the applanation tonometer (Tonopen XL) in normotensive dogs.
Leiva M; Naranjo C; Peña MT
Vet Ophthalmol; 2006; 9(1):17-21. PubMed ID: 16409240
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effect of corneal thickness on dynamic contour, rebound, and goldmann tonometry.
Martinez-de-la-Casa JM; Garcia-Feijoo J; Vico E; Fernandez-Vidal A; Benitez del Castillo JM; Wasfi M; Garcia-Sanchez J
Ophthalmology; 2006 Dec; 113(12):2156-62. PubMed ID: 16996599
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Evaluation of intraocular pressure measurements obtained by use of a rebound tonometer and applanation tonometer in dogs before and after elective phacoemulsification.
Thompson-Hom AL; Gerding PA
Am J Vet Res; 2012 May; 73(5):709-13. PubMed ID: 22533404
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Intraocular pressure measurement in mice: a comparison between Goldmann and rebound tonometry.
Kim CY; Kuehn MH; Anderson MG; Kwon YH
Eye (Lond); 2007 Sep; 21(9):1202-9. PubMed ID: 16946746
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Intraocular pressure in American Bullfrogs (Rana catesbeiana) measured with rebound and applanation tonometry.
Cannizzo SA; Lewbart GA; Westermeyer HD
Vet Ophthalmol; 2017 Nov; 20(6):526-532. PubMed ID: 28247466
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
