148 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17719031)
21. The influence of corneal geometrical and biomechanical properties on tonometry readings in keratoconic eyes.
Bilgeç MD; Atalay E; Sözer Ö; Gürsoy H; Bilgin M; Yıldırım N
Int Ophthalmol; 2020 Apr; 40(4):849-857. PubMed ID: 31792851
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Comparison of the iCare rebound tonometer and the Goldmann applanation tonometer over a wide IOP range.
Munkwitz S; Elkarmouty A; Hoffmann EM; Pfeiffer N; Thieme H
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2008 Jun; 246(6):875-9. PubMed ID: 18196259
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Goldmann applanation tonometry error relative to true intracameral intraocular pressure in vitro and in vivo.
McCafferty S; Levine J; Schwiegerling J; Enikov ET
BMC Ophthalmol; 2017 Nov; 17(1):215. PubMed ID: 29178849
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Predictability and limitations of non-invasive murine tonometry: comparison of two devices.
Filippopoulos T; Matsubara A; Danias J; Huang W; Dobberfuhl A; Ren L; Mittag T; Miller JW; Grosskreutz CL
Exp Eye Res; 2006 Jul; 83(1):194-201. PubMed ID: 16564045
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Comparison of Intraocular Pressure Measurements between Icare Pro Rebound Tonometer and Tono-Pen XL Tonometer in Supine and Lateral Decubitus Body Positions.
Lee TE; Yoo C; Hwang JY; Lin S; Kim YY
Curr Eye Res; 2015 Sep; 40(9):923-9. PubMed ID: 25271991
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Comparability of three intraocular pressure measurement: iCare pro rebound, non-contact and Goldmann applanation tonometry in different IOP group.
Chen M; Zhang L; Xu J; Chen X; Gu Y; Ren Y; Wang K
BMC Ophthalmol; 2019 Nov; 19(1):225. PubMed ID: 31726999
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Does rebound tonometry probe misalignment modify intraocular pressure measurements in human eyes?
Beasley IG; Laughton DS; Coldrick BJ; Drew TE; Sallah M; Davies LN
J Ophthalmol; 2013; 2013():791084. PubMed ID: 24073330
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. [Contemporary possibilities of intraocular pressure measurement].
Hornová J; Baxant A
Cesk Slov Oftalmol; 2013 Oct; 69(4):175-80. PubMed ID: 24437996
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Effect of central corneal thickness and radius of the corneal curvature on intraocular pressure measured with the Tono-Pen and noncontact tonometer in healthy schoolchildren.
Yildirim N; Sahin A; Basmak H; Bal C
J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus; 2007; 44(4):216-22. PubMed ID: 17694826
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Comparison of intraocular pressure measurements using rebound (TonoVet
McDonald JE; Knollinger AM; Dustin Dees D; MacLaren NE
Vet Ophthalmol; 2017 Mar; 20(2):155-159. PubMed ID: 27111099
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Evaluation of monkey intraocular pressure by rebound tonometer.
Yu W; Cao G; Qiu J; Liu X; Ma J; Li N; Yu M; Yan N; Chen L; Pang IH
Mol Vis; 2009 Oct; 15():2196-201. PubMed ID: 19898690
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Ocuton-S self tonometry vs. Goldmann tonometry; a diurnal comparison study.
Kóthy P; Vargha P; Holló G
Acta Ophthalmol Scand; 2001 Jun; 79(3):294-7. PubMed ID: 11401642
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Agreement of rebound tonometer in measuring intraocular pressure with three types of applanation tonometers.
Nakamura M; Darhad U; Tatsumi Y; Fujioka M; Kusuhara A; Maeda H; Negi A
Am J Ophthalmol; 2006 Aug; 142(2):332-4. PubMed ID: 16876523
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Evaluation of a rebound tonometer (Tonovet) in clinically normal cat eyes.
Rusanen E; Florin M; Hässig M; Spiess BM
Vet Ophthalmol; 2010 Jan; 13(1):31-6. PubMed ID: 20149173
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Comparison of rebound tonometer and Goldmann handheld applanation tonometer in congenital glaucoma.
Martinez-de-la-Casa JM; Garcia-Feijoo J; Saenz-Frances F; Vizzeri G; Fernandez-Vidal A; Mendez-Hernandez C; Garcia-Sanchez J
J Glaucoma; 2009 Jan; 18(1):49-52. PubMed ID: 19142135
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Method for the noninvasive measurement of intraocular pressure in mice.
Danias J; Kontiola AI; Filippopoulos T; Mittag T
Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2003 Mar; 44(3):1138-41. PubMed ID: 12601041
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. The influence of the tonometer position on canine intraocular pressure measurements using the Tonovet
de Oliveira JK; Montiani-Ferreira F; Williams DL
Open Vet J; 2018; 8(1):68-76. PubMed ID: 29721435
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. [Clinical evaluation of the dynamic rebound tonometer Icare].
Detry-Morel M; Jamart J; Detry MB; Pourjavan S; Charlier L; Dethinne B; Huge L; Ledoux A
J Fr Ophtalmol; 2006 Dec; 29(10):1119-27. PubMed ID: 17211320
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Evaluation of intraocular pressure in conscious ferrets (Mustela putorius furo) by means of rebound tonometry and comparison with applanation tonometry.
Di Girolamo N; Andreani V; Guandalini A; Selleri P
Vet Rec; 2013 Apr; 172(15):396. PubMed ID: 23486504
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Comparison of Intraocular Pressure Measurements Obtained by Rebound, Noncontact, and Goldmann Applanation Tonometry in Children.
Feng CS; Jin KW; Yi K; Choi DG
Am J Ophthalmol; 2015 Nov; 160(5):937-943.e1. PubMed ID: 26210864
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
