These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

115 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17719412)

  • 1. Vector guidance splint for internal maxillary distraction.
    Cheung LK; Chua HD; Lo J; Luk HW
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2007 Sep; 65(9):1852-6. PubMed ID: 17719412
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Clinical controversies in oral and maxillofacial surgery: Part two. External versus internal distraction osteogenesis for the management of severe maxillary hypoplasia: external distraction.
    Figueroa AA; Polley JW
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2008 Dec; 66(12):2598-604. PubMed ID: 19022141
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Clinical controversies in oral and maxillofacial surgery: Part one. Maxillary distraction osteogenesis for advancement in cleft patients, internal devices.
    Drew SJ
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2008 Dec; 66(12):2592-7. PubMed ID: 19022140
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Maxillary distraction osteogenesis with rigid external distraction.
    Polley JW; Figueroa AA
    Atlas Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am; 1999 Mar; 7(1):15-28. PubMed ID: 11905329
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The use of internal maxillary distraction for maxillary hypoplasia: a preliminary report.
    Van Sickels JE; Madsen MJ; Cunningham LL; Bird D
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2006 Dec; 64(12):1715-20. PubMed ID: 17113436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Maxillary distraction osteogenesis to treat maxillary hypoplasia: comparison of an internal and an external system.
    Kuroda S; Araki Y; Oya S; Mishima K; Sugahara T; Takano-Yamamoto T
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2005 Apr; 127(4):493-8. PubMed ID: 15821694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Maxillary distraction osteogenesis using the intraoral distractors and the full-covered tooth-supported maxillary splint.
    Iida S; Kogo M; Aikawa T; Masuda T; Yoshimura N; Adachi S
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2007 Apr; 65(4):813-7. PubMed ID: 17368387
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evaluation of a new semiburied curvilinear distraction device in dogs.
    Niu XG; Han XX
    Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2008 Jan; 46(1):61-3. PubMed ID: 17646039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. New fixation method for maxillary distraction osteogenesis using locking attachments.
    Suzuki EY; Buranastidporn B; Ishii M
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2006 Oct; 64(10):1553-60. PubMed ID: 16982316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A novel modular retention system for midfacial distraction osteogenesis.
    Hierl T; Hemprich A
    Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2000 Dec; 38(6):623-626. PubMed ID: 11092781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A new splint technique for anterior maxillary osteotomy under orotracheal intubation.
    Harada K; Enomoto T
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2000 Aug; 58(8):917-8. PubMed ID: 10935597
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Re: Reconstruction of curved mandibular angle defects using a new internal transport distraction device: an experiment in goats.
    McLeod NM
    Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2009 Apr; 47(3):247-8. PubMed ID: 19124180
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Removable splint with locking attachments for maxillary distraction osteogenesis with the RED system.
    Suzuki EY; Suzuki B
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2007 Dec; 36(12):1153-7. PubMed ID: 17629458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Maxillary sequels in labial-alveolar-velopalatine clefts. Role of distraction osteogenesis].
    Picard A; Diner PA; Labbé D; Nicolas J; Tomat C; Seigneuric JB; Vazquez MP; Bénateau H
    Rev Stomatol Chir Maxillofac; 2007 Sep; 108(4):313-20. PubMed ID: 17675124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Distraction of the mandibular ramus in hemifacial microsomia with a defect of the glenoid fossa.
    Patterson AR; Brady G; Loukota RA
    Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2007 Oct; 45(7):599-600. PubMed ID: 17328993
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Internal maxillary distraction with a new bimalar device.
    Kahn DM; Broujerdi J; Schendel SA
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2008 Apr; 66(4):675-83. PubMed ID: 18355590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Maxillary distraction complications in cleft patients].
    Jeblaoui Y; Morand B; Brix M; Lebeau J; Bettega G
    Rev Stomatol Chir Maxillofac; 2008 Sep; 109(4):218-24, discussion 224-5. PubMed ID: 18703208
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. New internal transport distraction device for reconstructing segmental defects of the mandible.
    Hibi H; Ueda M
    Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2006 Oct; 44(5):382-5. PubMed ID: 16236405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Maxillary advancement by distraction osteogenesis.
    Reddy LV; Elhadi HM
    Atlas Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am; 2008 Sep; 16(2):237-47. PubMed ID: 18710694
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Treatment of maxillary cleft palate: distraction osteogenesis versus orthognathic surgery--part one: Maxillary distraction.
    Rachmiel A
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2007 Apr; 65(4):753-7. PubMed ID: 17368374
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.