These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

496 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17720238)

  • 21. In vivo wear of enamel by a lithia disilicate-based core ceramic used for posterior fixed partial dentures: first-year results.
    Esquivel-Upshaw JF; Young H; Jones J; Yang M; Anusavice KJ
    Int J Prosthodont; 2006; 19(4):391-6. PubMed ID: 16900824
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Wear evaluation of the human enamel opposing different Y-TZP dental ceramics and other porcelains.
    Kim MJ; Oh SH; Kim JH; Ju SW; Seo DG; Jun SH; Ahn JS; Ryu JJ
    J Dent; 2012 Nov; 40(11):979-88. PubMed ID: 22892464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Wear performance of substructure ceramics and veneering porcelains.
    Preis V; Behr M; Kolbeck C; Hahnel S; Handel G; Rosentritt M
    Dent Mater; 2011 Aug; 27(8):796-804. PubMed ID: 21524788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Wear properties of dental ceramics and porcelains compared with human enamel.
    D'Arcangelo C; Vanini L; Rondoni GD; De Angelis F
    J Prosthet Dent; 2016 Mar; 115(3):350-5. PubMed ID: 26553254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Enamel wear by antagonistic restorative materials under erosive conditions.
    Wiegand A; Credé A; Tschammler C; Attin T; Tauböck TT
    Clin Oral Investig; 2017 Dec; 21(9):2689-2693. PubMed ID: 28185090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Confocal examination of subsurface cracking in ceramic materials.
    Etman MK
    J Prosthodont; 2009 Oct; 18(7):550-9. PubMed ID: 19486458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. How to qualify and validate wear simulation devices and methods.
    Heintze SD
    Dent Mater; 2006 Aug; 22(8):712-34. PubMed ID: 16574212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Fracture frequency of all-ceramic crowns during dynamic loading in a chewing simulator using different loading and luting protocols.
    Heintze SD; Cavalleri A; Zellweger G; Büchler A; Zappini G
    Dent Mater; 2008 Oct; 24(10):1352-61. PubMed ID: 18433859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. CAD/CAM leucite-reinforced glass-ceramic for simulation of attrition in human enamel in vitro.
    Almejrad L; Almansour A; Bartlett D; Austin R
    Dent Mater; 2024 Feb; 40(2):173-178. PubMed ID: 37951749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The effect of glazed and polished ceramics on human enamel wear.
    Olivera AB; Matson E; Marques MM
    Int J Prosthodont; 2006; 19(6):547-8. PubMed ID: 17165291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Influence of restoration thickness and dental bonding surface on the fracture resistance of full-coverage occlusal veneers made from lithium disilicate ceramic.
    Sasse M; Krummel A; Klosa K; Kern M
    Dent Mater; 2015 Aug; 31(8):907-15. PubMed ID: 26051232
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Effect of simulated mastication on the surface roughness of three ceramic systems.
    Amer R; Kürklü D; Johnston W
    J Prosthet Dent; 2015 Aug; 114(2):260-5. PubMed ID: 25957241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. The effect of core material, veneering porcelain, and fabrication technique on the biaxial flexural strength and weibull analysis of selected dental ceramics.
    Lin WS; Ercoli C; Feng C; Morton D
    J Prosthodont; 2012 Jul; 21(5):353-62. PubMed ID: 22462639
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Three-year clinical evaluation of two ceramic crown systems: a preliminary study.
    Etman MK; Woolford MJ
    J Prosthet Dent; 2010 Feb; 103(2):80-90. PubMed ID: 20141812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Wear performance of monolithic dental ceramics with different surface treatments.
    Preis V; Weiser F; Handel G; Rosentritt M
    Quintessence Int; 2013 May; 44(5):393-405. PubMed ID: 23479579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Randomized, controlled clinical trial of bilayer ceramic and metal-ceramic crown performance.
    Esquivel-Upshaw J; Rose W; Oliveira E; Yang M; Clark AE; Anusavice K
    J Prosthodont; 2013 Apr; 22(3):166-73. PubMed ID: 22978697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The influence of antagonistic surface roughness on the wear of human enamel and nanofilled composite resin artificial teeth.
    Ghazal M; Kern M
    J Prosthet Dent; 2009 May; 101(5):342-9. PubMed ID: 19410068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. In vitro investigation of the wear of human enamel by dental porcelain.
    Metzler KT; Woody RD; Miller AW; Miller BH
    J Prosthet Dent; 1999 Mar; 81(3):356-64. PubMed ID: 10050125
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Two-body wear of monolithic, veneered and glazed zirconia and their corresponding enamel antagonists.
    Stawarczyk B; Özcan M; Schmutz F; Trottmann A; Roos M; Hämmerle CH
    Acta Odontol Scand; 2013 Jan; 71(1):102-12. PubMed ID: 22364372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Three-body wear associated with three ceramics and enamel.
    al-Hiyasat AS; Saunders WP; Smith GM
    J Prosthet Dent; 1999 Oct; 82(4):476-81. PubMed ID: 10512969
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 25.