These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

296 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17720923)

  • 1. Evolution can favor antagonistic epistasis.
    Desai MM; Weissman D; Feldman MW
    Genetics; 2007 Oct; 177(2):1001-10. PubMed ID: 17720923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Coevolution of robustness, epistasis, and recombination favors asexual reproduction.
    MacCarthy T; Bergman A
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2007 Jul; 104(31):12801-6. PubMed ID: 17646644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The evolution of sex and recombination in response to abiotic or coevolutionary fluctuations in epistasis.
    Gandon S; Otto SP
    Genetics; 2007 Apr; 175(4):1835-53. PubMed ID: 17277371
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Accelerating Mutational Load Is Not Due to Synergistic Epistasis or Mutator Alleles in Mutation Accumulation Lines of Yeast.
    Jasmin JN; Lenormand T
    Genetics; 2016 Feb; 202(2):751-63. PubMed ID: 26596348
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Deleterious mutations, variable epistatic interactions, and the evolution of recombination.
    Otto SP; Feldman MW
    Theor Popul Biol; 1997 Apr; 51(2):134-47. PubMed ID: 9169238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Epistasis between deleterious mutations and the evolution of recombination.
    Kouyos RD; Silander OK; Bonhoeffer S
    Trends Ecol Evol; 2007 Jun; 22(6):308-15. PubMed ID: 17337087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Hidden epistastic interactions can favour the evolution of sex and recombination.
    Peck JR; Waxman D; Welch JJ
    PLoS One; 2012; 7(11):e48382. PubMed ID: 23185255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Compensatory mutations cause excess of antagonistic epistasis in RNA secondary structure folding.
    Wilke CO; Lenski RE; Adami C
    BMC Evol Biol; 2003 Feb; 3():3. PubMed ID: 12590655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Selection biases the prevalence and type of epistasis along adaptive trajectories.
    Draghi JA; Plotkin JB
    Evolution; 2013 Nov; 67(11):3120-31. PubMed ID: 24151997
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Accelerated inbreeding depression suggests synergistic epistasis for deleterious mutations in Drosophila melanogaster.
    Domínguez-García S; García C; Quesada H; Caballero A
    Heredity (Edinb); 2019 Dec; 123(6):709-722. PubMed ID: 31477803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Diploidy, population structure, and the evolution of recombination.
    Roze D
    Am Nat; 2009 Jul; 174 Suppl 1():S79-94. PubMed ID: 19476412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The role of deleterious mutations in allopatric speciation.
    Shpak M
    Evolution; 2005 Jul; 59(7):1389-99. PubMed ID: 16153025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Sexual reproduction selects for robustness and negative epistasis in artificial gene networks.
    Azevedo RB; Lohaus R; Srinivasan S; Dang KK; Burch CL
    Nature; 2006 Mar; 440(7080):87-90. PubMed ID: 16511495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Dependence of epistasis on environment and mutation severity as revealed by in silico mutagenesis of phage t7.
    You L; Yin J
    Genetics; 2002 Apr; 160(4):1273-81. PubMed ID: 11973286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Testing for epistasis between deleterious mutations in a parasitoid wasp.
    Rivero A; Balloux F; West SA
    Evolution; 2003 Jul; 57(7):1698-703. PubMed ID: 12940372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Epistasis and the selective advantage of sex and recombination.
    de Oliveira VM; da Silva JK; Campos PR
    Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys; 2008 Sep; 78(3 Pt 1):031905. PubMed ID: 18851063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Mutation-selection balance and the evolutionary advantage of sex and recombination.
    Charlesworth B
    Genet Res; 1990 Jun; 55(3):199-221. PubMed ID: 2394378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Genomic buffering mitigates the effects of deleterious mutations in bacteria.
    Maisnier-Patin S; Roth JR; Fredriksson A; Nyström T; Berg OG; Andersson DI
    Nat Genet; 2005 Dec; 37(12):1376-9. PubMed ID: 16273106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Testing for epistasis between deleterious mutations.
    West SA; Peters AD; Barton NH
    Genetics; 1998 May; 149(1):435-44. PubMed ID: 9584115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Negative epistasis between beneficial mutations in an evolving bacterial population.
    Khan AI; Dinh DM; Schneider D; Lenski RE; Cooper TF
    Science; 2011 Jun; 332(6034):1193-6. PubMed ID: 21636772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.