305 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17721429)
21. Self-reinforced ciprofloxacin-releasing polylactide-co-glycolide 80/20 inhibits attachment and biofilm formation by Staphylococcus epidermidis: an in vitro study.
Niemelä SM; Länsman S; Ikäheimo I; Koskela M; Veiranto M; Suokas E; Törmälä P; Syrjälä H; Ashammakhi N
J Craniofac Surg; 2006 Sep; 17(5):950-6. PubMed ID: 17003625
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Higher biofilm formation in multidrug-resistant clinical isolates of Staphylococcus aureus.
Kwon AS; Park GC; Ryu SY; Lim DH; Lim DY; Choi CH; Park Y; Lim Y
Int J Antimicrob Agents; 2008 Jul; 32(1):68-72. PubMed ID: 18534827
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Staphylococcus epidermidis device-related infections: pathogenesis and clinical management.
McCann MT; Gilmore BF; Gorman SP
J Pharm Pharmacol; 2008 Dec; 60(12):1551-71. PubMed ID: 19000360
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Evaluation of antimicrobial effects of novel implant materials by testing the prevention of biofilm formation using a simple small scale medium-throughput growth inhibition assay.
Patenge N; Arndt K; Eggert T; Zietz C; Kreikemeyer B; Bader R; Nebe B; Stranak V; Hippler R; Podbielski A
Biofouling; 2012; 28(3):267-77. PubMed ID: 22435853
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Susceptibility of staphylococcal biofilms to enzymatic treatments depends on their chemical composition.
Chaignon P; Sadovskaya I; Ragunah Ch; Ramasubbu N; Kaplan JB; Jabbouri S
Appl Microbiol Biotechnol; 2007 May; 75(1):125-32. PubMed ID: 17221196
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Effect of chlorhexidine and benzalkonium chloride on bacterial biofilm formation.
Houari A; Di Martino P
Lett Appl Microbiol; 2007 Dec; 45(6):652-6. PubMed ID: 17944843
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Effects of alcohols, povidone-iodine and hydrogen peroxide on biofilms of Staphylococcus epidermidis.
Presterl E; Suchomel M; Eder M; Reichmann S; Lassnigg A; Graninger W; Rotter M
J Antimicrob Chemother; 2007 Aug; 60(2):417-20. PubMed ID: 17586808
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. [Detection of bacterial biofilm on medical biomaterials].
Rózalska B; Sadowska B; Wieckowska M; Rudnicka W
Med Dosw Mikrobiol; 1998; 50(1-2):115-22. PubMed ID: 9857621
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. In vitro activity of mupirocin on clinical isolates of Staphylococcus aureus and its potential implications in chronic rhinosinusitis.
Ha KR; Psaltis AJ; Butcher AR; Wormald PJ; Tan LW
Laryngoscope; 2008 Mar; 118(3):535-40. PubMed ID: 18090864
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Orthopaedic metal devices coated with a novel antiseptic dye for the prevention of bacterial infections.
Bahna P; Dvorak T; Hanna H; Yasko AW; Hachem R; Raad I
Int J Antimicrob Agents; 2007 May; 29(5):593-6. PubMed ID: 17317111
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Antimicrobial peptides prevent bacterial biofilm formation on the surface of polymethylmethacrylate bone cement.
Volejníková A; Melicherčík P; Nešuta O; Vaňková E; Bednárová L; Rybáček J; Čeřovský V
J Med Microbiol; 2019 Jun; 68(6):961-972. PubMed ID: 31107198
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Impact of slime dispersants and anti-adhesives on in vitro biofilm formation of Staphylococcus epidermidis on intraocular lenses and on antibiotic activities.
Kadry AA; Fouda SI; Shibl AM; Abu El-Asrar AA
J Antimicrob Chemother; 2009 Mar; 63(3):480-4. PubMed ID: 19147522
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Treatment of a cochlear implant biofilm infection: a potential role for alternative antimicrobial agents.
Brady AJ; Farnan TB; Toner JG; Gilpin DF; Tunney MM
J Laryngol Otol; 2010 Jul; 124(7):729-38. PubMed ID: 20214837
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. [Differences in antibiotic sensitivity in biofilm-positive and biofilm-negative strains of Staphylococcus epidermidis isolated from blood cultures].
Holá V; Růzicka F; Votava M
Epidemiol Mikrobiol Imunol; 2004; 53(2):66-9. PubMed ID: 15185631
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Staphylococcus aureus biofilm formation and antibiotic susceptibility tests on polystyrene and metal surfaces.
Coraça-Huber DC; Fille M; Hausdorfer J; Pfaller K; Nogler M
J Appl Microbiol; 2012 Jun; 112(6):1235-43. PubMed ID: 22435667
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilm formation and slime excretion on antibiotic-loaded bone cement.
Neut D; Hendriks JG; van Horn JR; van der Mei HC; Busscher HJ
Acta Orthop; 2005 Feb; 76(1):109-14. PubMed ID: 15788318
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. The combination of ultrasound with antibiotics released from bone cement decreases the viability of planktonic and biofilm bacteria: an in vitro study with clinical strains.
Ensing GT; Neut D; van Horn JR; van der Mei HC; Busscher HJ
J Antimicrob Chemother; 2006 Dec; 58(6):1287-90. PubMed ID: 17041238
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Can Near-infrared Spectroscopy Detect and Differentiate Implant-associated Biofilms?
Tidwell JE; Dawson-Andoh B; Adedipe EO; Nkansah K; Dietz MJ
Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2015 Nov; 473(11):3638-46. PubMed ID: 26265208
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Chitosan-based rechargeable long-term antimicrobial and biofilm-controlling systems.
Cao Z; Sun Y
J Biomed Mater Res A; 2009 Jun; 89(4):960-7. PubMed ID: 18470925
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. New in vitro model evaluating antiseptics' efficacy in biofilm-associated Staphylococcus aureus prosthetic vascular graft infection.
Staneviciute E; Na'amnih W; Kavaliauskas P; Prakapaite R; Ridziauskas M; Kevlicius L; Kirkliauskiene A; Zabulis V; Urboniene J; Triponis V
J Med Microbiol; 2019 Mar; 68(3):432-439. PubMed ID: 30735113
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
