These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
4. Short cue presentations encourage advance task preparation: a recipe to diminish the residual switch cost. Verbruggen F; Liefooghe B; Vandierendonck A; Demanet J J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2007 Mar; 33(2):342-56. PubMed ID: 17352616 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Hierarchical control of cognitive processes: switching tasks in sequences. Schneider DW; Logan GD J Exp Psychol Gen; 2006 Nov; 135(4):623-40. PubMed ID: 17087577 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Separating cue encoding from target processing in the explicit task-cuing procedure: are there "true" task switch effects? Arrington CM; Logan GD; Schneider DW J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2007 May; 33(3):484-502. PubMed ID: 17470002 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Setting goals to switch between tasks: effect of cue transparency on children's cognitive flexibility. Chevalier N; Blaye A Dev Psychol; 2009 May; 45(3):782-97. PubMed ID: 19413431 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Working memory costs of task switching. Liefooghe B; Barrouillet P; Vandierendonck A; Camos V J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2008 May; 34(3):478-94. PubMed ID: 18444750 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Temporal cue-target overlap is not essential for backward inhibition in task switching. Grange JA; Houghton G Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2009 Oct; 62(10):2068-79. PubMed ID: 19225989 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Dissociating cue-related and task-related processes in task inhibition: evidence from using a 2:1 cue-to-task mapping. Gade M; Koch I Can J Exp Psychol; 2008 Mar; 62(1):51-5. PubMed ID: 18473629 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Dissociating the components of switch cost using two-to-two cue-task mapping. Hydock C; Sohn MH J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2011 Jun; 37(3):903-13. PubMed ID: 21463080 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Asymmetric switch cost and backward inhibition: Carryover activation and inhibition in switching between tasks of unequal difficulty. Arbuthnott KD Can J Exp Psychol; 2008 Jun; 62(2):91-100. PubMed ID: 18572986 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Exploring task-set reconfiguration with random task sequences. Milán EG; Sanabria D; Tornay F; González A Acta Psychol (Amst); 2005 Mar; 118(3):319-31. PubMed ID: 15698827 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Cognitive control in cued task switching with transition cues: cue processing, task processing, and cue-task transition congruency. Van Loy B; Liefooghe B; Vandierendonck A Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2010 Oct; 63(10):1916-35. PubMed ID: 20574933 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Advance preparation in task switching: what work is being done? Altmann EM Psychol Sci; 2004 Sep; 15(9):616-22. PubMed ID: 15327633 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The role of cue-target translation in backward inhibition of attentional set. Houghton G; Pritchard R; Grange JA J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2009 Mar; 35(2):466-76. PubMed ID: 19271859 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]