665 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17723303)
1. Two simple methods for determining gait events during treadmill and overground walking using kinematic data.
Zeni JA; Richards JG; Higginson JS
Gait Posture; 2008 May; 27(4):710-4. PubMed ID: 17723303
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of three kinematic gait event detection methods during overground and treadmill walking for individuals post stroke.
French MA; Koller C; Arch ES
J Biomech; 2020 Jan; 99():109481. PubMed ID: 31718818
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Determination of toe-off event time during treadmill locomotion using kinematic data.
De Witt JK
J Biomech; 2010 Nov; 43(15):3067-9. PubMed ID: 20801452
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A kinematic and kinetic comparison of overground and treadmill walking in healthy subjects.
Riley PO; Paolini G; Della Croce U; Paylo KW; Kerrigan DC
Gait Posture; 2007 Jun; 26(1):17-24. PubMed ID: 16905322
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A comparison of treadmill walking and overground walking in independently ambulant stroke patients: a pilot study.
Puh U; Baer GD
Disabil Rehabil; 2009; 31(3):202-10. PubMed ID: 18608434
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison between kinematic and ground reaction force techniques for determining gait events during treadmill walking at different walking speeds.
Kiss RM
Med Eng Phys; 2010 Jul; 32(6):662-7. PubMed ID: 20226713
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of methods for kinematic identification of footstrike and toe-off during overground and treadmill running.
Fellin RE; Rose WC; Royer TD; Davis IS
J Sci Med Sport; 2010 Nov; 13(6):646-50. PubMed ID: 20478742
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Automatic identification of gait events during walking on uneven surfaces.
Eckardt N; Kibele A
Gait Posture; 2017 Feb; 52():83-86. PubMed ID: 27888695
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A comparison of kinematic algorithms to estimate gait events during overground running.
Smith L; Preece S; Mason D; Bramah C
Gait Posture; 2015 Jan; 41(1):39-43. PubMed ID: 25212739
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Treadmill walking and overground walking of human subjects compared by recording sole-floor reaction force.
Warabi T; Kato M; Kiriyama K; Yoshida T; Kobayashi N
Neurosci Res; 2005 Nov; 53(3):343-8. PubMed ID: 16182398
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A comparison of kinematic-based gait event detection methods in a self-paced treadmill application.
Hendershot BD; Mahon CE; Pruziner AL
J Biomech; 2016 Dec; 49(16):4146-4149. PubMed ID: 27825601
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Development and validation of an accelerometer-based method for quantifying gait events.
Boutaayamou M; Schwartz C; Stamatakis J; Denoël V; Maquet D; Forthomme B; Croisier JL; Macq B; Verly JG; Garraux G; Brüls O
Med Eng Phys; 2015 Feb; 37(2):226-32. PubMed ID: 25618221
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A comparison of gait biomechanics and metabolic requirements of overground and treadmill walking in people with stroke.
Brouwer B; Parvataneni K; Olney SJ
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2009 Nov; 24(9):729-34. PubMed ID: 19664866
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Ageing and limb dominance effects on foot-ground clearance during treadmill and overground walking.
Nagano H; Begg RK; Sparrow WA; Taylor S
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2011 Nov; 26(9):962-8. PubMed ID: 21719169
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A three-dimensional kinematic and kinetic comparison of overground and treadmill walking in healthy elderly subjects.
Watt JR; Franz JR; Jackson K; Dicharry J; Riley PO; Kerrigan DC
Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2010 Jun; 25(5):444-9. PubMed ID: 20347194
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of vertical ground reaction forces during overground and treadmill walking.
White SC; Yack HJ; Tucker CA; Lin HY
Med Sci Sports Exerc; 1998 Oct; 30(10):1537-42. PubMed ID: 9789855
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Assessment and validation of a simple automated method for the detection of gait events and intervals.
Ghoussayni S; Stevens C; Durham S; Ewins D
Gait Posture; 2004 Dec; 20(3):266-72. PubMed ID: 15531173
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. A comparison of centre of pressure behaviour and ground reaction force magnitudes when individuals walk overground and on an instrumented treadmill.
Hutchinson LA; De Asha AR; Rainbow MJ; Dickinson AWL; Deluzio KJ
Gait Posture; 2021 Jan; 83():174-176. PubMed ID: 33152613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Detection of gait cycles in treadmill walking using a Kinect.
Auvinet E; Multon F; Aubin CE; Meunier J; Raison M
Gait Posture; 2015 Feb; 41(2):722-5. PubMed ID: 25442670
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Automated event detection algorithms in pathological gait.
Bruening DA; Ridge ST
Gait Posture; 2014; 39(1):472-7. PubMed ID: 24041468
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
