These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

80 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17723950)

  • 1. [Propensity score: interest and limits].
    Kwiatkowski F; Slim K; Verrelle P; Chamorey E; Kramar A
    Bull Cancer; 2007 Jul; 94(7):680-6. PubMed ID: 17723950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Propensity score: A credible alternative to randomization?].
    Filleron T; Kwiatowski F
    Bull Cancer; 2016 Jan; 103(1):113-22. PubMed ID: 26657188
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Assessing balance in measured baseline covariates when using many-to-one matching on the propensity-score.
    Austin PC
    Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf; 2008 Dec; 17(12):1218-25. PubMed ID: 18972455
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Propensity score methods for bias reduction in the comparison of a treatment to a non-randomized control group.
    D'Agostino RB
    Stat Med; 1998 Oct; 17(19):2265-81. PubMed ID: 9802183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Adjusting for Confounding in Early Postlaunch Settings: Going Beyond Logistic Regression Models.
    Schmidt AF; Klungel OH; Groenwold RH;
    Epidemiology; 2016 Jan; 27(1):133-42. PubMed ID: 26436519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Goodness-of-fit diagnostics for the propensity score model when estimating treatment effects using covariate adjustment with the propensity score.
    Austin PC
    Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf; 2008 Dec; 17(12):1202-17. PubMed ID: 18972454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Targeted estimation of nuisance parameters to obtain valid statistical inference.
    van der Laan MJ
    Int J Biostat; 2014; 10(1):29-57. PubMed ID: 24516006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Performance of disease risk scores, propensity scores, and traditional multivariable outcome regression in the presence of multiple confounders.
    Arbogast PG; Ray WA
    Am J Epidemiol; 2011 Sep; 174(5):613-20. PubMed ID: 21749976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [What are the propensity scores?].
    Ojeda D; Gómez R; Burgos Á
    Rev Med Chil; 2016 Mar; 144(3):364-70. PubMed ID: 27299823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The performance of different propensity-score methods for estimating relative risks.
    Austin PC
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2008 Jun; 61(6):537-45. PubMed ID: 18471657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Conditioning on the propensity score can result in biased estimation of common measures of treatment effect: a Monte Carlo study.
    Austin PC; Grootendorst P; Normand SL; Anderson GM
    Stat Med; 2007 Feb; 26(4):754-68. PubMed ID: 16783757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Health-related quality of life in early breast cancer.
    Groenvold M
    Dan Med Bull; 2010 Sep; 57(9):B4184. PubMed ID: 20816024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Propensity Score Matching in Nonrandomized Studies: A Concept Simply Explained Using Antidepressant Treatment During Pregnancy as an Example.
    Andrade C
    J Clin Psychiatry; 2017 Feb; 78(2):e162-e165. PubMed ID: 28234438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The performance of different propensity score methods for estimating marginal odds ratios.
    Austin PC
    Stat Med; 2007 Jul; 26(16):3078-94. PubMed ID: 17187347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The project data sphere initiative: accelerating cancer research by sharing data.
    Green AK; Reeder-Hayes KE; Corty RW; Basch E; Milowsky MI; Dusetzina SB; Bennett AV; Wood WA
    Oncologist; 2015 May; 20(5):464-e20. PubMed ID: 25876994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Estimators and confidence intervals for the marginal odds ratio using logistic regression and propensity score stratification.
    Stampf S; Graf E; Schmoor C; Schumacher M
    Stat Med; 2010 Mar; 29(7-8):760-9. PubMed ID: 20213703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Too much ado about propensity score models? Comparing methods of propensity score matching.
    Baser O
    Value Health; 2006; 9(6):377-85. PubMed ID: 17076868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Targeting Uric Acid and the Inhibition of Progression to End-Stage Renal Disease--A Propensity Score Analysis.
    Uchida S; Chang WX; Ota T; Tamura Y; Shiraishi T; Kumagai T; Shibata S; Fujigaki Y; Hosoyamada M; Kaneko K; Shen ZY; Fujimori S
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(12):e0145506. PubMed ID: 26700005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Propensity score methods and their application in nephrology research.
    Barnieh L; James MT; Zhang J; Hemmelgarn BR
    J Nephrol; 2011; 24(3):256-62. PubMed ID: 21404223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Bias reduction in repeated-measures observational studies by the use of propensity score: the case of enteral sedation for critically ill patients.
    Umbrello M; Mistraletti G; Corbella D; Cigada M; Salini S; Morabito A; Iapichino G
    J Crit Care; 2012 Dec; 27(6):662-72. PubMed ID: 22884533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.