378 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17724676)
1. Liquid-based cytology versus conventional Papanicolaou smear in an organized screening program : a prospective randomized study.
Strander B; Andersson-Ellström A; Milsom I; Rådberg T; Ryd W
Cancer; 2007 Oct; 111(5):285-91. PubMed ID: 17724676
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Critical Analyses of the Introduction of Liquid-Based Cytology in a Public Health Service of the State of São Paulo, Brazil.
Longatto-Filho A; Levi JE; Martins TR; Cohen D; Cury L; Villa LL; Eluf-Neto J
Acta Cytol; 2015; 59(3):273-7. PubMed ID: 26279162
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Conventional Pap smear and liquid-based cytology as screening tools in low-resource settings in Latin America: experience of the Latin American screening study.
Longatto-Filho A; Maeda MY; Erzen M; Branca M; Roteli-Martins C; Naud P; Derchain SF; Hammes L; Matos J; Gontijo R; Sarian LO; Lima TP; Tatti S; Syrjänen S; Syrjänen K
Acta Cytol; 2005; 49(5):500-6. PubMed ID: 16334026
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Is a liquid-based cytology more sensitive than a conventional Pap smear?
Sigurdsson K
Cytopathology; 2013 Aug; 24(4):254-63. PubMed ID: 23331613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of conventional and liquid-based Pap smear methods in the diagnosis of precancerous cervical lesions.
Honarvar Z; Zarisfi Z; Salari Sedigh S; Masoumi Shahrbabak M
J Obstet Gynaecol; 2022 Aug; 42(6):2320-2324. PubMed ID: 35579303
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Cervical biopsy-based comparison of a new liquid-based thin-layer preparation with conventional Pap smears.
Mattosinho de Castro Ferraz Mda G; Nicolau SM; Stávale JN; Focchi J; Castelo A; Dôres GB; Mielzynska-Lohnas I; Lorincz A; Rodrigues de Lima G
Diagn Cytopathol; 2004 Apr; 30(4):220-6. PubMed ID: 15048954
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparing PAP smear cytology, aided visual inspection, screening colposcopy, cervicography and HPV testing as optional screening tools in Latin America. Study design and baseline data of the LAMS study.
Syrjänen K; Naud P; Derchain S; Roteli-Martins C; Longatto-Filho A; Tatti S; Branca M; Erzen M; Hammes LS; Matos J; Gontijo R; Sarian L; Braganca J; Arlindo FC; Maeda MY; Lörincz A; Dores GB; Costa S; Syrjänen S
Anticancer Res; 2005; 25(5):3469-80. PubMed ID: 16101165
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Pooled analysis of the performance of liquid-based cytology in population-based cervical cancer screening studies in China.
Pan QJ; Hu SY; Zhang X; Ci PW; Zhang WH; Guo HQ; Cao J; Zhao FH; Lytwyn A; Qiao YL
Cancer Cytopathol; 2013 Sep; 121(9):473-82. PubMed ID: 23907807
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. [Health technology assessment report. Use of liquid-based cytology for cervical cancer precursors screening].
Ronco G; Confortini M; Maccallini V; Naldoni C; Segnan N; Sideri M; Zappa M; Zorzi M; Calvia M; Giorgi Rossi P
Epidemiol Prev; 2012; 36(5 Suppl 2):e1-e33. PubMed ID: 23139163
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of the SurePath liquid-based Papanicolaou smear with the conventional Papanicolaou smear in a multisite direct-to-vial study.
Fremont-Smith M; Marino J; Griffin B; Spencer L; Bolick D
Cancer; 2004 Oct; 102(5):269-79. PubMed ID: 15386329
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Natural history of false-negative papanicolaou smears: a prospective study using screening colposcopy in addition to cytology.
Mannino JR
J Am Osteopath Assoc; 1998 Oct; 98(10):542-6. PubMed ID: 9821735
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Positive predictive value of liquid-based and conventional cervical Papanicolaou smears reported as malignant.
Uyar DS; Eltabbakh GH; Mount SL
Gynecol Oncol; 2003 May; 89(2):227-32. PubMed ID: 12713984
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparative study between liquid-based cytology & conventional Pap smear for cytological follow up of treated patients of cancer cervix.
Singh U; ; Qureshi S; Negi N; Singh N; Goel M; Srivastava K
Indian J Med Res; 2018 Mar; 147(3):263-267. PubMed ID: 29923515
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A comparison of liquid-based cytology and Pap smear as a screening method for cervical cancer.
Zhu J; Norman I; Elfgren K; Gaberi V; Hagmar B; Hjerpe A; Andersson S
Oncol Rep; 2007 Jul; 18(1):157-60. PubMed ID: 17549362
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Prevalence of abnormal cervical cytology by liquid based cytology in the antenatal care clinic, Thammasat University Hospital.
Khaengkhor P; Mairaing K; Suwannarurk K; Thaweekul Y; Poomtavorn Y; Pattaraarchachai J; Bhamarapravatana K
J Med Assoc Thai; 2011 Feb; 94(2):152-8. PubMed ID: 21534360
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Cervical screening with primary HPV testing or cytology in a population of women in which those aged 33 years or younger had previously been offered HPV vaccination: Results of the Compass pilot randomised trial.
Canfell K; Caruana M; Gebski V; Darlington-Brown J; Heley S; Brotherton J; Gertig D; Jennett CJ; Farnsworth A; Tan J; Wrede CD; Castle PE; Saville M
PLoS Med; 2017 Sep; 14(9):e1002388. PubMed ID: 28926579
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of Unsatisfactory Rates and Detection of Abnormal Cervical Cytology Between Conventional Papanicolaou Smear and Liquid-Based Cytology (Sure Path®).
Kituncharoen S; Tantbirojn P; Niruthisard S
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2015; 16(18):8491-4. PubMed ID: 26745107
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Liquid-based cytology: evaluation of effectiveness, cost-effectiveness, and application to present practice.
Cox JT
J Natl Compr Canc Netw; 2004 Nov; 2(6):597-611. PubMed ID: 19780303
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Direct comparison of liquid-based and conventional cytology in a South African screening trial.
Taylor S; Kuhn L; Dupree W; Denny L; De Souza M; Wright TC
Int J Cancer; 2006 Feb; 118(4):957-62. PubMed ID: 16152600
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. HPV testing with cytology triage for cervical cancer screening in routine practice.
Louvanto K; Chevarie-Davis M; Ramanakumar AV; Franco EL; Ferenczy A
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2014 May; 210(5):474.e1-7. PubMed ID: 24373948
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
