BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

865 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 17725126)

  • 1. Trends versus tradition in cesarean surgery: effects on midwifery practice and cesarean mothers' future pregnancies.
    Gaskin IM
    Midwifery Today Int Midwife; 2007; (82):32-4. PubMed ID: 17725126
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A tale of 2 births.
    Remer M
    Midwifery Today Int Midwife; 2009; (91):11. PubMed ID: 19824250
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Conscious motherhood.
    Agrawal P
    Midwifery Today Int Midwife; 2006; (80):52-3. PubMed ID: 17265837
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Caesarean section for non-medical reasons at term.
    Anderson T
    Pract Midwife; 2006 Sep; 9(8):34-5. PubMed ID: 16989416
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Caesareans and authoritative knowledge.
    Fahy K
    Women Birth; 2007 Sep; 20(3):101-3. PubMed ID: 17706476
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Creating normality in a high-risk pregnancy.
    Lindsay P
    Pract Midwife; 2006 Jan; 9(1):16-9. PubMed ID: 16425679
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Rebalancing obstetric and midwifery thinking.
    Taylor M
    Pract Midwife; 2008; 11(7):24-8. PubMed ID: 18709801
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Midwives and uterine rupture: what we have to offer.
    Eggleston K
    Midwifery Today Int Midwife; 2007; (83):24-5, 65-7. PubMed ID: 17927116
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A Ugandan placement.
    Gordon S
    Pract Midwife; 2008 Feb; 11(2):29-30. PubMed ID: 18372818
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The future of obstetric technology.
    Odent M
    Midwifery Today Int Midwife; 2008; (85):20-2. PubMed ID: 18429513
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Rekindling of nurse-midwifery in Brazil: public policy and childbirth trends.
    Carr M; Riesco ML
    J Midwifery Womens Health; 2007; 52(4):406-11. PubMed ID: 17603964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Marion's message: too many or not enough cesarean sections?
    McLean MT
    Midwifery Today Int Midwife; 2007; (82):9. PubMed ID: 17725115
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Can the importance of midwives be measured in deaths?
    McCarthy R
    Pract Midwife; 2011 Jun; 14(6):38, 40-1. PubMed ID: 21739737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Uganda.
    Sparrevohn C
    Midwifery Today Int Midwife; 2007; (84):58-9, 69. PubMed ID: 18214280
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Problematizing choice in the elective cesarean debate.
    Weeks L
    Midwifery Today Int Midwife; 2005; (73):20-2. PubMed ID: 15835842
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Choose & lose: promoting cesareans and other invasive interventions.
    Wagner M
    Midwifery Today Int Midwife; 2008; (85):12-3, 62. PubMed ID: 18429509
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Report on Uganda.
    Smith M
    Midwifery Today Int Midwife; 2008; (85):50. PubMed ID: 18429524
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Midwifery & birthing: women in Peru.
    Ingar C
    Midwifery Today Int Midwife; 2008; (85):51, 67-8. PubMed ID: 18429525
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Midwifery doesn't change--with time or place.
    Hall J
    Pract Midwife; 2009 Feb; 12(2):4-5. PubMed ID: 19266762
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Birth in 2050.
    Tritten J
    Midwifery Today Int Midwife; 2010; (94):5, 64. PubMed ID: 20572604
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 44.